Literature DB >> 32396675

Personal protective equipment induced facial dermatoses in healthcare workers managing Coronavirus disease 2019.

M Singh1, M Pawar2, A Bothra3, A Maheshwari4, V Dubey5, A Tiwari6, A Kelati7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32396675      PMCID: PMC7272982          DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   9.228


× No keyword cloud information.
Editor, During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, frontline healthcare workers (HCW) are working tirelessly for long hours to provide patient care. Although COVID is not dermatotropic, prolonged contact with personal protective equipment (PPE, i.e. goggles, face‐shield/visor, N 95 respirator, double‐layered gloves, coverall/gowns, head cover and shoe cover) may cause various dermatoses. Several dermatoses have been reported due to PPE, such as pressure injury, contact dermatitis, pressure urticaria and exacerbation of pre‐existing skin diseases, including seborrheic dermatitis and acne. , We report a preliminary data of HCW who experienced facial dermatoses due to the use of PPE. From 24 March 2020 to 16 April 2020, we came across with 43 patients comprising physicians, nurses and paramedical staff who involved (directly/indirectly) in managing patients of COVID‐19. We used telemedicine to consult these patients. Their history, clinical findings including onset, duration, location, clinical features and other associated symptoms of dermatoses and type of PPE used were recorded. However, patch could not be performed. Final diagnosis was based on history, clinical findings and pattern of dermatoses and symptoms. The most commonly noted dermatoses were irritant contact dermatitis (ICD; 39.5%) followed by friction dermatitis (25.5%). Goggles were the most common culprit agent among all PPE causing any one of the dermatoses (51.92%), followed by N95 masks (30.77%) and face shields (17.31%). Nasal bridge (63%) was the commonest anatomical site affected due to dermatoses followed by cheeks and chin (26%). However, there was a considerable overlap of different dermatoses with affliction of multiple sites. The most common symptom experienced by patients was pruritus (67.44%), while erythema (53.49%) was the most common sign observed. Interestingly, we observed two distinct dermatoses, i.e. whole face erythema (suffusion; 21%) attributed to doffing after a long shift and lip lick dermatitis due to constant licking of lips, because of feeling of intense thirst due to restricted fluid intake after donning PPE. The duration of wearing the goggles and mask, excessive sweating and ill‐fitting masks, all were associated with increased sensation of irritation. Most of these dermatoses responded well to topical moisturizer, calamine lotion and oral antihistamines. Overall, 21% patients suffered from work absenteeism due to one of the dermatoses (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical features and other data of health care workers suffered from dermatoses

VariablesNumber (n)Percentage (%)
Number of patients43
Mean age32.78 ± 14.51
Sex (Male: Female)1.39
Average duration PPE worn per day (hours):8.76 ± 2.31
Average time after which rotation/doffing done (hours):4.08 ± 1.01
Healthcare role:
i. Doctors3172.09
ii. Nurses920.93
iii. Miscellaneous like ward assistants/cleaners/transport teams36.98
Type of dermatoses:
i. Irritant contact dermatitis1739.53
ii. Allergic dermatitis036.98
iii. Pressure/friction marks/rhagades1125.58
iv. Sweat dermatitis0716.28
v. Facial acne0511.63
vi. Lip lick dermatitis0409.30
Site:
i. Forehead0920.93
ii. Eyelids/canthus (goggle dermatitis)1227.91
iii. Nasal bridge (goggle and mask dermatitis/pressure dermatosis)2762.79
iv. Temple (Visor/mask straps)0920.93
v. Medial concha of ear (N95 respirator straps)0716.28
vi. Cheeks and chin1125.58
vii. Lips/angle of mouth0409.30
Symptoms:
i. Itching2967.44
ii. Rash/redness2148.84
iii. Burning1125.58
iv. Smarting0818.60
v. Skin tightness/dryness1637.21
Signs:
i. Erythema2353.49
ii. Vesicles0920.93
iii. Scaling1944.19
iv. Urticaria0204.65
v. Papules0716.28
vi. Pustules0409.30
vii. Pressure indentations and bruising2046.51
viii. Excessive lacrimation0818.60
ix. Rhinorrhoea0613.95
x. Skin discontinuity (Erosions/fissuring/excoriation)3172.09
Systemic features:
i. Nausea0511.63
ii. Headaches2762.79
iii. Sneezing0409.30
iv. Feeling of intense heat3786.05
v. Claustrophobia/agitation with PPE suit3172.09
vi. Facial rubeosis/suffusion0920.93
Allergic predisposition0716.28
Treatment given:
i. Spontaneous resolution with frequent breaks alone0818.60
ii. Topical calamine with aloe vera extracts1023.26
iii. Topical tacrolimus0920.93
iv. Topical low to mid potency steroids0409.30
v. Oat colloidal meal based moisturizer2455.81
vi. Petroleum jelly0409.30
vii. Systemic antihistamines1534.88
Patients requiring rescue steroids0409.30
Work absenteeism0920.93
Clinical features and other data of health care workers suffered from dermatoses Personal protective equipment‐induced dermatoses occur mainly due to the occlusion and hyper‐hydration effect of PPE and friction leading breach in the epidermal integrity. Recently, in China, authors noted a very high prevalence, i.e. 97% of skin damages in first‐line HCW fighting COVID‐19. Yin Z in his study found N‐95 mask‐induced pressure sore on the nasal bridge in HCW managing COVID‐19 patients. Skin barrier may create a portal of entry for COVID‐19, as angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2, the cell receptor for Severe acute respiratory distress‐related Coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), is abundantly present in blood vessels of the skin and the basal layer of the epidermis. As cases of COVID‐19 are on rise with exponential phase, we fear that the dermatoses‐induced skin breach and irritation, and frequent touching of face due to latter, may increase the exposure and entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the healthcare workers. Air‐conditioning, proper fitting masks, use of better material (latex straps to be avoided) in the goggles and frequent rotation and regular breaks with removal of the mask and wiping of skin to remove sweat, may help in alleviation of dermatoses in HCW. Adequate hydration is useful to avoid dehydration‐induced dermatoses and dry skin. Moisturizers or emollients are needed to restore the integrity of skin barrier and should be applied at least 30 min before wearing mask, to prevent the damage to mask. Staff is advised not to smoke if they have applied emollient containing white soft paraffin, as it is flammable. Low potency topical steroid or tacrolimus is required in some cases if above measures fail.
  5 in total

1.  Covid-19: countermeasure for N95 mask-induced pressure sore.

Authors:  Z Q Yin
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  COVID-19 pandemic and the skin: what should dermatologists know?

Authors:  Razvigor Darlenski; Nikolai Tsankov
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.541

3.  Skin reactions to non-glove personal protective equipment: an emerging issue in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  M Gheisari; F Araghi; H Moravvej; M Tabary; S Dadkhahfar
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 9.228

4.  Skin damage among health care workers managing coronavirus disease-2019.

Authors:  Jiajia Lan; Zexing Song; Xiaoping Miao; Hang Li; Yan Li; Liyun Dong; Jing Yang; Xiangjie An; Yamin Zhang; Liu Yang; Nuoya Zhou; Liu Yang; Jun Li; JingJiang Cao; Jianxiu Wang; Juan Tao
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis.

Authors:  I Hamming; W Timens; M L C Bulthuis; A T Lely; G J Navis; H van Goor
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.996

  5 in total
  36 in total

1.  Skin Exposures, Hand Eczema and Facial Skin Disease in Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Nils Hamnerius; Ann Pontén; Ola Bergendorff; Magnus Bruze; Jonas Björk; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 2.  The Work Environment during Coronavirus Epidemics and Pandemics: A Systematic Review of Studies Using Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Designs.

Authors:  Anna Nyberg; Kristiina Rajaleid; Ingrid Demmelmaier
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  COVID-19 and dermatological personal protective equipment considerations.

Authors:  Travis S Dowdle; Mallory Thompson; Mahmud Alkul; Jeannie M Nguyen; Ashley L E Sturgeon
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  The lived experiences of frontline nurses during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Qatar: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ralph C Villar; Abdulqadir J Nashwan; Rejo G Mathew; Ahmed S Mohamed; Sathish Munirathinam; Ahmad A Abujaber; Mahmood M Al-Jabry; Mujahed Shraim
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 5.  COVID-19: What are the challenges for NHS surgery?

Authors:  Natasha L Wielogórska; Chidi C Ekwobi
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Retroauricular dermatitis with vehement use of ear loop face masks during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  A Bothra; S Das; M Singh; M Pawar; A Maheswari
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 9.228

7.  Iatrogenic dermatitis in times of COVID-19: a pandemic within a pandemic.

Authors:  R Bhatia; T Sindhuja; S Bhatia; T Dev; A Gupta; M Bajpai; S Gupta
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 9.228

Review 8.  Rapid Review of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 Viability, Susceptibility to Treatment, and the Disinfection and Reuse of PPE, Particularly Filtering Facepiece Respirators.

Authors:  José G B Derraik; William A Anderson; Elizabeth A Connelly; Yvonne C Anderson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Skin Damage Induced by Enhanced Protective Measures in Frontline Doctors During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Web-Based Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Mahimanjan Saha; Indrashis Podder; Anupam Das
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Facial dermatoses in the general population due to wearing of personal protective masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: first observations after lockdown.

Authors:  S Giacalone; A Minuti; C B Spigariolo; E Passoni; G Nazzaro
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.