Literature DB >> 32396179

Effect of Surgery vs Functional Bracing on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures: The FISH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lasse Rämö1, Bakir O Sumrein2, Vesa Lepola2, Tuomas Lähdeoja1, Jonas Ranstam3, Mika Paavola1, Teppo Järvinen1, Simo Taimela1.   

Abstract

Importance: Humeral shaft fractures traditionally have been treated nonsurgically, but there has been a steady increase in the rate of surgery over the past 2 decades without high-quality evidence to justify the trend. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment with open reduction and internal plate fixation to nonsurgical treatment with functional bracing in the treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 2 university hospital trauma centers in Finland, enrollment between November 2012 and January 2018 with a final follow-up of January 2019. A total of 82 adult patients with closed, unilateral, displaced humeral shaft fracture met criteria for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had cognitive disabilities preventing them from following the protocol or had multimorbidity or multiple trauma. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to surgical treatment with open reduction and internal plate fixation (n = 38) or to nonsurgical treatment with functional bracing (n = 44). Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 12 months (range, 0 to 100 points, 0 denotes no disability and 100 extreme disability; minimal clinically important difference, 10 points).
Results: Among 82 patients who were randomized (mean age, 48.9 years; 38 women [46%]; 44 men [54%]), 78 (95%) completed the trial. Thirteen (30%) of the patients assigned to functional bracing underwent surgery during the 12-month follow-up period to promote healing of the fracture. At 12 months, the mean DASH score was 8.9 (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6) in the surgery group and 12.0 (95% CI, 7.7 to 16.4) in the bracing group (between-group difference, -3.1 points; 95% CI, -9.6 to 3.3; P = .34). Eleven patients (25%) allocated to functional bracing developed fracture nonunion. Three patients (8%) allocated to surgery developed a temporary radial nerve palsy. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with closed humeral shaft fracture, internal fixation surgery, compared with nonoperative functional bracing, did not significantly improve functional outcomes at 12 months. However, the substantial amount of treatment crossover from nonoperative to surgical treatment should be considered when interpreting the trial results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01719887.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32396179      PMCID: PMC7218498          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.3182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  25 in total

1.  Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  J A K Toivanen; J Nieminen; H-J Laine; S E Honkonen; M J Järvinen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus.

Authors:  A Sarmiento; P B Kinman; E G Galvin; R H Schmitt; J G Phillips
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Humeral shaft fractures: results of operative and non-operative treatment.

Authors:  Edward Westrick; Benjamin Hamilton; Paul Toogood; Bradford Henley; Reza Firoozabadi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  G Tytherleigh-Strong; N Walls; M M McQueen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-03

5.  Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis.

Authors:  A Sarmiento; J B Zagorski; G A Zych; L L Latta; C A Capps
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Modern Results of Functional Bracing of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Rafael Serrano; Hassan R Mir; Henry C Sagi; Daniel S Horwitz; Amrut Borade; John E Tidwell; John P Ketz; Brian J Kistler; Jonathan H Quade; Michael J Beebe; Brigham K Au; Roy W Sanders; Anjan R Shah
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management.

Authors:  Bradley S Schoch; Eric M Padegimas; Mitchell Maltenfort; James Krieg; Surena Namdari
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-08

8.  Surgical interventions to treat humerus shaft fractures: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jia-Guo Zhao; Jia Wang; Xiao-Hui Meng; Xian-Tie Zeng; Shi-Lian Kan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation.

Authors:  Qiukui Hao; Tahira Devji; Dena Zeraatkar; Yuting Wang; Anila Qasim; Reed A C Siemieniuk; Per Olav Vandvik; Tuomas Lähdeoja; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Thomas Agoritsas; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A prospective randomised controlled trial of operative versus non-operative management of fractures of the humeral diaphysis: the HUmeral Shaft Fracture FIXation (HU-FIX) Study protocol.

Authors:  William M Oliver; Thomas H Carter; Catriona Graham; Timothy O White; Nicholas D Clement; Andrew D Duckworth; Samuel G Molyneux
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  11 in total

1.  Comment on "A comparative study of 6-week and 12-week Radiographic Union Scores for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) as a predictor of humeral shaft non-union".

Authors:  William M Oliver; Nicholas D Clement; Andrew D Duckworth
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  In response to the Letter-to-the-Editor by William Oliver, Nicholas Clement and Andrew Duckworth.

Authors:  Borna Guevel; Peter Domos
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2022-02-03

3.  On Patient Safety: Shoulder "Impingement"-Telling a SAD Story About Public Trust.

Authors:  Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  The management of displaced humeral shaft fractures - A survey of UK shoulder and elbow surgeons.

Authors:  Abdul Ahad; Aziz Haque; Alison Armstrong; Amit Modi; Radhakant Pandey; Harvinder Pal Singh
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)-a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dennis Karimi; Stig Brorson; Kaare S Midtgaard; Tore Fjalestad; Aksel Paulsen; Per Olerud; Carl Ekholm; Olof Wolf; Bjarke Viberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  Outcomes With Surgery vs Functional Bracing for Patients With Closed, Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures and the Need for Secondary Surgery: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the FISH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lasse Rämö; Mika Paavola; Bakir O Sumrein; Vesa Lepola; Tuomas Lähdeoja; Jonas Ranstam; Teppo L N Järvinen; Simo Taimela
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Pediatric Humeral Shaft Fractures Under Ultrasonographic Guidance: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jun Li; Jun Wu; Yuan Zhang; Pan Gou; Xiang Li; Mingyan Shi; Man Zhang; Peikang Wang; Xing Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Return to work and sport after a humeral shaft fracture.

Authors:  William M Oliver; Samuel G Molyneux; Timothy O White; Nick D Clement; Andrew D Duckworth
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-03

9.  Functional and clinical outcome after operative versus nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture (HUMMER): results of a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dennis Den Hartog; Saskia H Van Bergen; Kiran C Mahabier; Michael H J Verhofstad; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Surgery versus non-operative treatment for ER-stress unstable Weber-B unimalleolar fractures: a study protocol for a prospective randomized non-inferiority (Super-Fin) trial.

Authors:  Tero Kortekangas; Ristomatti Lehtola; Hannu-Ville Leskelä; Simo Taimela; Pasi Ohtonen; Olli Savola; Teppo Järvinen; Harri Pakarinen
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2021-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.