Literature DB >> 32395488

Risk factors for cardiovascular disease from a population-based screening study in Tianjin, China: a cohort study of 36,215 residents.

Yingyi Zhang1, Hongliang Cong1, Chen Man2, Yu Su3, Hongxia Sun4, Hua Yang1, Zhigang Guo5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a harmful disease that poses a serious threat to human life. By effectively controlling its risk factors, the occurrence and development of CVD can be reduced, and people's health status and quality of life can be improved.
METHODS: A total of 36,215 participants were collected from participants of the Early Screening and Comprehensive Intervention Program for High Risk Population of Cardiovascular Disease in Tianjin on July 31, 2017. We analyzed the relationship between CVD risk and personal information, personal and family medical history, biochemical index, and physical fitness index using Pearson's chi-squared test with and without Yates's correction for continuity, and Fisher's exact test. CVD risk-related factors were examined through logistic regression and decision tree analysis.
RESULTS: A personal history of hypertension and apoplexy had a contingency coefficient with CVD risk of more than 0.3. A higher risk of CVD was also found to be associated with biochemical markers of cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood sugar. Logistic regression analysis revealed 12 indicators to be influencing factors of CVD, including age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and the number of people aged >90 in the family. Hypertension, SBP, BMI, cholesterol, and blood glucose were associated with five or more other indicators.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CVD risk factors in Tianjin residents is relatively high. Family disease history and individual physical fitness indicators need to be taken into account during CVD screening and intervention, to reduce the risk of CVD. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs); family disease history; physical indicators; risk factor

Year:  2020        PMID: 32395488      PMCID: PMC7210118          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), sometimes called the “silent disease”, is an ischemic or hemorrhagic disorder of the heart and systemic tissues (1). CVD is caused by bloody lesions and, with no obvious clinical symptoms, is characterized by the secretive, progressive, and systemic manner in which it inflicts damage on the body. CVD is one of the most serious threats to human health worldwide today, especially for middle-aged and older people over the age of 50 (2-5), and its morbidity and mortality have surpassed those of cancer. By 2030, nearly 23.6 million people will die of CVD every year, with only heart disease and stroke causing more fatalities (5). In China, there are currently 290 million patients with CVD, but with the influence of population increase and aging, the number of patients with CVD is expected to increase by more than 50% by 2030 (6). In recent years, CVD has accounted for 40% of deaths in China, with about 2.6 million people dying from CVD each year (7). This has seen CVD claim its place as the top cause of death and top threat to health in China. Furthermore, the average age of onset of CVD shows a downward trend (8), with more people developing the disease at a younger age. The high incidence of CVD and its impact on quality of life have brought a heavy economic and psychological burden to society, families, and the individuals who suffer with the disease (9). CVDs include a range of conditions, such as coronary heart disease (heart attack), cerebrovascular disease (stroke), peripheral vascular disease, rheumatic heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. The majority (80%) of patients with CVD are died from heart disease and strokes. The occurrence of CVD is the result of long-term interaction between various adverse factors. Hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, and obesity are currently recognized as the five major risk factors for CVD (10-12). Related studies have shown that the above-mentioned CVD risk factors have increased in recent decades among the Chinese population, and the accumulation of multiple risk factors is more likely to increase the risk of CVD (13,14). There is evidence that shows that the prevention of risk factors and early screening and diagnosis can greatly reduce the morbidity and mortality of CVD (15). This study set out to establish a better understanding of CVD risk factors among residents of Tianjin, China, and to provide new insight into the prevention of CVD. This will enable us to effectively control the risk factors of CVD and reduce occurrence and development of the disease in the future.

Methods

Data sources

The data were collected from participants of the Early Screening and Comprehensive Intervention Program for High Risk Population of Cardiovascular Disease in Tianjin on July 31, 2017. A total of 36,215 participants were recruited including 25,494 classified as non-high risk and 10,721 classified as high risk. The criteria for assessing high-risk CVD were CVD history, hypertension, dyslipidemia, WHO risk assessment, and a risk of ≥20% in special subjects.

Data analysis

The information of each participant included personal information, personal and family medical history, biochemical indicators and physical indicators. Personal information included age (one level every five years), gender, ethnicity, household registration, marital status, education, family income, recent smoking status, and drinking status in the past year. Personal medical history took into account hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dyslipidemia, bypass surgery, or percutaneous coronary intervention. Family medical history referred to: the number of people in the participant’s family aged >90; the number of family members who had died of myocardial infarction, stroke, cancer, or sudden death; and family members who had received heart bypass surgery, stent implantation, valve replacement, radiofrequency ablation, implantation of automatic defibrillator, heart transplantation, or surgery for congenital heart disease. Biochemical indicators contain cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), blood glucose, triglyceride, proteinuria, ketone bodies, and occult blood. Physical indicators included body mass index (BMI), heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and waist circumference.

Statistical analysis

According to the data type, Pearson’s chi-squared test, with and without Yates’s continuity correction, and Fisher’s exact test were used to analyze the relationship between personal information, personal and family medical history, biochemical and physical indicators, and the relationship between CVD risk and these indicators. The correlation between the indicators was expressed using the number of column connections, and the hierarchical data of two independent samples were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore related indicators in four categories: personal information, family medical history, biochemical indicators, and physical indicators. Variables were screened using a conditional parameter estimation likelihood ratio test, with an inclusion criterion of P<0.05 and a rejection criterion of P>0.1. All analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corporation, America) and R 3.4.4 (the Institute for Statistics and Mathematics of WU, Austria). The network map was drawn using Cytoscape. Statistical significance was considered to exist when P<0.05.

Results

Personal information

There were significant differences found in age, gender, marital status, education level, household income, and smoking and drinking habits between the non-high-risk group and high-risk group (P<0.001), and all the contingency coefficients were within 0.1 [except for age (0.262)], which indicated a certain relationship between these factors and CVD (). There were no significant differences between ethnicity or household registration and CVD risk ().
Table 1

The relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and personal information

IndicatorsGroupNo. of non-high risk of CVDNo. of high risk of CVDStatisticsP valueContingency coefficientP value
AgeAge (per 5 years)25,59810,617−51.452<0.0010.262<0.001
GenderMen9,5314,53290.506<0.0010.05<0.001
Women16,0056,085
Ethnic groupHan24,51210,1373.6030.0580.010.054
Non-Han943437
Hukou statusAgriculture6,6522,7400.2240.6360.0030.627
Non-agriculture18,8707,873
Marital statusMarried23,4269,63714.168<0.0010.02<0.001
Widowed, separated, divorced, or single1,991957
Education levelPrimary school or lower4,4542,581−17.402<0.0010.095<0.001
Middle school10,6534,532
High school6,7372,492
College or above3,509993
Household income (¥/year)<10,0002,0151,040−8.33<0.0010.064<0.001
10,000–25,0006,7703,241
25,001–50,0008,3673,093
50,001–100,0006,2422,622
100,001–200,000801211
>200,0005615
Current smoking situationNo smoking19,9017,856−8.574<0.0010.051<0.001
Occasional smoking519174
Smoking most of the time13752
Smoking every day4,9442,527
Drinking in the past yearNever18,9477,435−9.715<0.0010.068<0.001
<1 time a month1,801748
2–4 times a month1,388540
2–3 times a week962411
>4 times a week2,3261,450

Personal and family medical history

With the exception of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, all other personal medical history indicators were associated with CVD risk, and had significant difference (P<0.001). Among these indicators, hypertension or stroke had a contingency coefficient with CVD risk of more than 0.3 (). For diabetes, myocardial infarction, dyslipidemia, and percutaneous coronary intervention the contingency coefficient with CVD risk reached 0.15–0.30 (). Patients whose relatives who had undergone heart transplant and valve replacement surgery were also associated with CVD risk. Of the other family-related indicators, the number of relatives aged >90 (), and relatives with myocardial infarction, stroke, and cancer, were associated with CVD risk with contingency coefficients higher than 0.15 ().
Table 2

The relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and personal disease history

IndicatorsGroupNo. of non-high risk of CVDNo. of high risk of CVDStatisticsP valueContingency coefficientP value
HypertensionNo19,4754,6033,660.366<0.0010.318<0.001
yes6,0426,011
DiabetesNo23,1938,456868.030<0.0010.155<0.001
yes2,3242,158
Myocardial infarctionNo25,51410,1001,236.898<0.0010.185<0.001
yes3514
ApoplexyNo25,5109,1513,630.856<0.0010.317<0.001
yes71,463
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseNo25,48310,5950.7820.3760.0050.301
yes3419
DyslipidemiaNo24,4689,498544.511<0.0010.123<0.001
yes1,0491,116
Bypass surgeryNo25,51610,505255.113<0.0010.085<0.001
yes1109
Percutaneous coronary interventionNo25,51410,0461,370.671<0.0010.195<0.001
yes3568
Figure 1

Density plots of high risk of CVD in all participants. Data are shown stratified by the number of family members over 90 years of age (A), the number of relatives with myocardial infarction (B), cholesterol (C), blood glucose (D), systolic blood pressure (E) and diastolic blood pressure (F). The density means estimated probability risk of CVD. The area under the curve is 1.

Table 3

The relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and disease history of relatives

IndicatorsGroupNo. of non-high risk of CVDNo. of high risk of CVDStatisticsP valueContingency coefficientP value
No. of relatives over 90 years old021,4027,647−30.822<0.0010.292<0.001
13,8971,565
211,091
Above 20246
The no. of myocardial infarction024,8299,776−22.624<0.0010.148<0.001
1631538
21226
Above 2032
The no. of apoplexy024,4219,352−27.309<0.0010.187<0.001
11,037780
24378
Above 2068
The no. of cancer023,8839,431−15.889<0.0010.155<0.001
11,571800
22278
Above 2068
The no. of sudden death025,20310,354−8.686<0.0010.06<0.001
1244182
Two or more140
The no. of heart bypass surgery025,35510,337−16.018<0.0010.089<0.001
1135209
Two or more051
The no. of stent implantation025,17410,143−18.39<0.0010.105<0.001
1314383
Two or more072
The no. of valve replacement025,43110,5621.1750.2780.0060.229
One or more5530
The no. of radiofrequency ablation025,46710,5754.5300.0330.0120.021
One or more2118
The no. of embedded automatic defibrillator025,47710,5826.1490.0130.0140.006
One or more811
The no. of heart transplant025,48510,5880.0650.0110.045
One or more24
The no. of surgery for congenital heart disease025,46210,5704.7570.0290.0120.019
One or more2420
Density plots of high risk of CVD in all participants. Data are shown stratified by the number of family members over 90 years of age (A), the number of relatives with myocardial infarction (B), cholesterol (C), blood glucose (D), systolic blood pressure (E) and diastolic blood pressure (F). The density means estimated probability risk of CVD. The area under the curve is 1.

Biochemical index and physical fitness index

All the biochemical indicators apart from ketone bodies were significantly associated with CVD risk (). The contingency coefficient of cholesterol (), LDL-C, and blood glucose () and the risk of CVD reached more than 0.2 (). The contingency coefficient between other indicators and CVD risk were low, but there were significant differences between the high-risk and non-high-risk groups (P<0.001). Among the physical indicators, the contingency coefficient of SBP and DBP and CVD risk in the high-risk and non-high-risk groups were 0.339 and 0.257, respectively, and the P value was less than 0.001 (, ). There were meaningful differences in BMI, waist, and heart rate between the high-risk and non-high-risk groups, but the contingency coefficient with CVD risk was not high ().
Table 4

The relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and biochemical index

IndicatorsGroupNo. of non-high risk of CVDNo. of high risk of CVDStatisticsP valueContingency coefficientP value
Biochemical index
   Cholesterol (mmol/L)<2.957−41.953<0.0010.222<0.001
2.9-620,5536,292
>64,9584,314
   Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)<2.111,2163,172−33.697<0.0010.219<0.001
2.1-3.111,4485,209
>3.11,1971,727
   High density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)<1.142,5181,221−7.895<0.0010.042<0.001
1.14–1.7616,3337,011
>1.766,5762,358
   Blood sugar (mmol/L)<3.98524−42.989<0.0010.227<0.001
3.9-6.121,2396,632
>6.14,1763,944
   Triglyceride<0.56703170−16.372<0.0010.086<0.001
0.56–1.75,6441,639
>1.719,0638,773
   Urine protein+956836271.551<0.0010.087<0.001
24,4699,736
   Ketone bodies+2721140.0050.943<0.0010.943
25,14710,456
   Occult blood+3,6591,6083.9880.0460.0110.046
21,7588,962
Physical fitness index
   BMI (kg/m2)<18.525945−25.796<0.0010.136<0.001
18.5–247,8742,117
24–2811,1894,739
>286,1953,712
   Heart rate (beats per minute)<601,187617−0.0210.9830.049<0.001
60–10023,9779,722
>100353275
   Systolic pressure (mmHg)<13012,2211,994−65.485<0.0010.339<0.001
130–1405,3431,297
>1407,6357,297
   Diastolic pressure (mmHg)<6044184−49.878<0.0010.257<0.001
60–9021,7216,664
>903,3553,866
   Waist (cm)<87.1513,8183,887921.849<0.0010.16<0.001
>87.1511,6996,727

Multi-factor logistic regression analysis

Our logistic regression model comprised 12 indicators with a predictive power of 78.6%. According to the results of regression analysis, the risk of CVD increased by 0.296 for every 5-year increase in age. Compared with patients with SBP >140 mmHg, the risk of CVD was only 0.344 and 0.310 in patients with SBP <130 and 130–140 mmHg, respectively. Compared with subjects with DBP >90 mmHg, subjects with DBP <60 mmHg and between 60 and 90 mmHg had only 0.268 and 0.320 risk of CVD, respectively. For every additional person in a subject’s family who was >90 years old or had suffered a stroke, the risk of CVD was 2.69 times or 2.307 times higher, respectively, than that of normal people ().
Table 5

Multi-factor Logistic regression for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk

IndicatorsBS. E.WaldP valueExp (B)
Age0.2600.008946.423<0.0011.297
Systolic pressure (mmHg)
   >1401054.645<0.001
   <130−1.0680.040719.093<0.0010.344
   130–140−1.1410.043694.265<0.0010.319
Diastolic pressure (mmHg)
   >90914.341<0.001
   <60−1.3170.15176.417<0.0010.268
   60–90−1.1400.038911.617<0.0010.320
Blood sugar (mmol/L)
   >6.1470.107<0.001
   <3.90.1240.2880.1850.6671.132
   3.9–6.1−0.7760.036461.839<0.0010.460
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)
   >3.1463.795<0.001
   <2.1−1.1750.058413.318<0.0010.309
   2.1–3.1−1.1050.053432.374<0.0010.331
Urine protein (−)−0.3820.06238.042<0.0010.682
Number of relatives over 90 years old1.1210.0271696.310<0.0013.069
Number of relatives of myocardial infarction1.1130.060341.267<0.0013.042
Number of relatives of apoplexy1.1960.046678.516<0.0013.307
Number of relatives of cancer0.8150.042377.532<0.0012.259
Number of relatives underwent heart bypass surgery1.0080.12960.934<0.0012.739
Number of relatives underwent stent implantation0.9840.091116.513<0.0012.676
Constant0.6070.08946.063<0.0011.834

Decision tree model analysis

Subjects with incomplete information were excluded, and the remaining 32,262 cases were randomly divided into two sets: 70% in the training set and 30% in the validation set. Firstly, focusing on the training set, we selected meaningful indicators (including personal information, family medical history, biochemical indicators, and physical indicators) to construct decision trees. The decision tree model had 17 nodes and 8 endpoints with a depth of 3 (). In the decision tree, the first layer was SBP, indicating it had the strongest association with the risk of CVD. Participants with SBP >140 mmHg had higher incidence of CVD. In addition, having more than 2 family members aged >90 years had the most significant impact on the risk of CVD. When the SBP >140 mmHg and there were 0 or 1 family members >90 years of age, the participants with DBP >90 mmHg had a higher risk of CVD than those with <90 mmHg. Moreover, participants who had 2 or 3 family members >90 years old were part of high-risk group (). The accuracy of the decision tree model on the training and validation sets was 77.4% and 77.3%, respectively.
Figure 2

Tree diagram generated by decision tree model.

Tree diagram generated by decision tree model.

Correlation analysis among factors

By analyzing the correlations among the various indicators, we filtered out the correlations with relative coefficient >0.2 to construct a network map. In the network, a correlation was identified between hypertension and seven indicators, including SBP, DBP, and BMI. Hypertension and SBP had the largest correlation. SBP had a correlation with six indicators, while BMI, cholesterol, and blood glucose were associated with five other indicators ().
Figure 3

Correlation network between different indicators. Different colored lines indicate different correlation. The diamond indicates that the indicator had a correlation with more than five indicators.

Correlation network between different indicators. Different colored lines indicate different correlation. The diamond indicates that the indicator had a correlation with more than five indicators.

Discussion

The characteristics of CVD risk factors differ from region to region according to variations in diet and lifestyle. A large number of studies have analyzed the risk factors for CVD in different regions of China. This study provided a unique opportunity to analyze in detail the CVD risk factors to public health in Tianjin, China. In the present research, we focused on the correlation of various factors with CVD degrees, and displayed it through a network diagram. In this network, SBP, DBP, BMI, age, diabetes, waist circumference, and hypertension were all associated with CVD risk. BMI, cholesterol, and blood glucose were associated with five other indicators. These results allow us to understand the relationship between CVD and its risk factors, especially family disease history and physical indicators, and this is conducive to the design of reasonable strategies to control the morbidity of CVD. A lot of research has been done on the risk factors for CVD. Yu et al. (16) studied CVD-related prevalence and demographic-related risk factors in Jilin Province, and pointed out that people who are elderly, or who have low-income or low-education should be targeted in the prevention of CVD. Based on the prevalence and risk factors of CVD in rural communities in Fangshan District of Beijing, He et al. (17) forecast that high-risk factors of CVD and population aging might become public health problems in developing rural areas. Xu et al. (18) found that hypertension, diabetes, overweight/obesity, dyslipidemia, and current smoking were major CVD risk factors in the Tibetan population. However, little exploration has been carried out of the characteristics of CVD risk factors in Tianjin. This study analyzed the statistical data of the Early Screening and Comprehensive Intervention Program for High Risk Population of Cardiovascular Disease, conducted by the National Cardiovascular Center in Tianjin. SBP, number of relatives over 90 years old, hypertension, and BMI were the major CVD risk factors in Tianjin residents. The predictive ability of the logistic regression model was 78.6%, indicating that this study has certain significance for guiding the prevention and intervention of CVD in Tianjin. CVD risk factors can be divided into genetic and environmental risk factors, with the latter closely related to lifestyle and of greater importance. Smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, unhealthy diet, and lack of physical activity are environmental risk factors, and eliminating or changing related behaviors can help to prevent CVD. Hypertension is the most crucial and independent risk factor for CVD (19), and is currently one of the most common diseases in China (20). Hypertension can easily cause atherosclerosis, further damage to areas including the heart, cerebrovascular system, kidneys, and aorta, and the incidence of coronary heart disease can be enhanced (20). This study found that people with SBP >140 mmHg or DBP >90 mmHg showed an increased risk of CVD. An increased systolic and DBP heighten the risk of hypertension, which may further trigger CVD. In addition, family history of CVD is a hereditary, unchangeable risk factor. Family history of CVD is a recognized risk factor, and multiple prospective studies have demonstrated consistent and independent associations between family history and CVD (21). A study has shown that family history of early coronary heart disease (CHD) is associated with a sustained increase in the risk of CHD and CVD death during long-term follow-up, resulting in a significant increase in lifetime risk assessment. A study by Ranthe et al. (22) concluded that the family history of early-onset CVD death is consistently and markedly associated with the risk of early-onset CVD, which indicates a genetic heart disease susceptibility. In our study, we demonstrated that participants who had a relative older than 90 or a stroke patient member in their family had a 2.069-fold and 2.307-fold increased risk of CVD, respectively. Additionally, SBP, DBP, the number of relatives aged over 90, and stroke patients in the family constituted the decision tree model. The accuracy of the decision tree model on the training set and test set was 77.4% and 77.3%, respectively. These four indicators in the model may be an important component of CVD screening and diagnosis. Typically, each CVD patient has multiple risk factors. With societal advancements and improved living standards, everyone has increased exposure to CVD risk factors. The accumulation of multiple CVD risk factors in the same individual poses a serious issue. Previous studies have found that the relative risks of coronary heart disease or stroke associated with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 risk factors were 1.6 or 1.4, 2.2 or 1.9, 3.1 or 2.3, and 5.0 or 4.3, respectively (23). Reported by Yang et al. (23) compared with patients without risk factors, patients with 1, 2, 3 or ≥4 risk factors had an odds ratio of 2.36, 4.24, 4.88, and 7.22 for CVD, respectively. Many studies have revealed that the occurrence of CVD is the result of long-term interactions of multiple adverse factors. Our study considered the relationship between various risk factors in the CVD prevention and screening process, which is of great significance for the prevention of CVD and the improvement of public health awareness.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study provided a scientific basis for the development of CVD prevention and control measures and strategies. By designing ongoing individualized coaching and support, better long-term clinical improvements in patients with CVD can be achieved. The article’s supplementary files as
  22 in total

Review 1.  A review of the cost of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jean-Eric Tarride; Morgan Lim; Marie DesMeules; Wei Luo; Natasha Burke; Daria O'Reilly; James Bowen; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 2.  AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION AND THE RISK OF ALL-CAUSE AND CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Xueling Xin; Yongye Sun; Shiru Li; Hui Xu; Dongfeng Zhang
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease in China: Current Perspective and Prospects for the Future.

Authors:  Chengxing Shen; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  The worldwide environment of cardiovascular disease: prevalence, diagnosis, therapy, and policy issues: a report from the American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  Lawrence J Laslett; Peter Alagona; Bernard A Clark; Joseph P Drozda; Frances Saldivar; Sean R Wilson; Chris Poe; Menolly Hart
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease: an update.

Authors:  J R Sowers; M Epstein; E D Frohlich
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men.

Authors:  P M Ridker; M Cushman; M J Stampfer; R P Tracy; C H Hennekens
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Inflammatory bowel disease and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Hao Sun; Feng Tian
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 7.804

8.  Parental cardiovascular disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults: a prospective study of parents and offspring.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Byung-Ho Nam; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy; Joanne M Murabito; Thomas J Wang; Peter W F Wilson; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience.

Authors:  Peter W F Wilson; Ralph B D'Agostino; Lisa Sullivan; Helen Parise; William B Kannel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-09

10.  Prevalence of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in a rural district of Beijing, China: a population-based survey of 58,308 residents.

Authors:  Liu He; Xun Tang; Yan Song; Na Li; Jingrong Li; Zongxin Zhang; Jianjiang Liu; Liping Yu; Haitao Xu; Jianguo Zhang; Yonghua Hu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  3 in total

1.  Late response to rosuvastatin and statin-related myalgia due to SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, ABCB11, and CYP3A5 variants in a patient with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: a case report.

Authors:  Carolina Dagli-Hernandez; Renata Caroline Costa de Freitas; Elisangela da Silva Rodrigues Marçal; Rodrigo Marques Gonçalves; Andre Arpad Faludi; Jéssica Bassani Borges; Gisele Medeiros Bastos; Bruna Los; Augusto Akira Mori; Raul Hernandes Bortolin; Glaucio Monteiro Ferreira; Victor Fernandes de Oliveira; Thiago Dominguez Crespo Hirata; Mario Hiroyuki Hirata; Rosario Dominguez Crespo Hirata
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

2.  Estimating Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Seogsong Jeong; Gyeongsil Lee; Seulggie Choi; Kyae Hyung Kim; Jooyoung Chang; Sung Min Kim; Kyuwoong Kim; Joung Sik Son; Yoosun Cho; Sang Min Park
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-17

3.  A Risk-Stratification Machine Learning Framework for the Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease Severity: Insights From the GESS Trial.

Authors:  Nikolaos Mittas; Fani Chatzopoulou; Konstantinos A Kyritsis; Christos I Papagiannopoulos; Nikoleta F Theodoroula; Andreas S Papazoglou; Efstratios Karagiannidis; Georgios Sofidis; Dimitrios V Moysidis; Nikolaos Stalikas; Anna Papa; Dimitrios Chatzidimitriou; Georgios Sianos; Lefteris Angelis; Ioannis S Vizirianakis
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.