Literature DB >> 32394242

Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in very elderly patients aged 85 years and older.

Kazuyoshi Takagi1, Koichi Arinaga2, Tohru Takaseya2, Hiroyuki Otsuka2, Takahiro Shojima2, Yusuke Shintani2, Yasuyuki Zaima2, Kosuke Saku2, Atsunobu Oryoji2, Shinichi Hiromatsu2.   

Abstract

Degenerative aortic stenosis is the most common structural heart valve disease affecting the aging population. Catheter-based heart valve interventions are less invasive and very useful for very elderly patients. However, we often consider open heart surgery for these patients because of anatomical reasons and co-existing cardiac diseases, i.e., severe coronary artery disease. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of very elderly patients aged ≥ 85 years undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Twenty-nine very elderly patients aged ≥ 85 years who underwent AVR with CABG (n = 11, Group AC) or isolated AVR (n = 18, Group A) were examined. The overall mean age of the patients was 87.2 ± 2.6 (range 85-94) years. The estimated operative mortality rate, calculated using the Japan score, EuroSCORE II, and STS risk score, was 5.72%-10.88% in Group AC and 5.63%-8.30% in Group A. Aortic cross-clamp time (126.5 ± 29.0 vs. 96.9 ± 29.2 min, p = 0.016) was significantly longer in Group AC than in Group A. Although the major morbidity rate was higher in Group AC than in Group A (36% vs. 6%, p = 0.0336), the length of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay was comparable between both groups. There was no 30-day and hospital mortality in both groups. Eleven patients died during follow-up (senility, 5; cerebrovascular events, 2; renal failure, 1; unknown, 3). There were no significant differences in survival rates during follow-up (log-rank p value = 0.1051). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year survival rates were 91%, 80%, 69%, 69% and 69%, respectively, in Group AC and 94%, 94%, 94%, 94% and 88%, respectively, in Group A. In conclusion, AVR with or without CABG could be safely performed in carefully selected very elderly patients with acceptable early- and long-term results. AVR with CABG in very elderly patients aged ≥ 85 offers similar results to isolated AVR in terms of 30-day mortality, hospital mortality, and long-term survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting; Outcome; Very elderly patients

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32394242     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-020-01620-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  3 in total

1.  Coronary artery bypass grafting added to surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.

Authors:  Luigi Spadafora; Marco Bernardi; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Giacomo Frati
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

2.  The early and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting added to aortic valve replacement compared to isolated aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano D'Alessandro; Domenico Tuttolomondo; Gurmeet Singh; Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Claudia Pattuzzi; Alan Gallingani; Francesco Maestri; Francesco Nicolini; Francesco Formica
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 1.814

3.  The impact of coronary artery bypass grafting added to aortic valve replacement on long-term outcomes in octogenarian patients: a reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan Gallingani; Stefano D'Alessandro; Gurmeet Singh; Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Mevlüt Çelik; Evelina Ceccato; Francesco Nicolini; Francesco Formica
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.