| Literature DB >> 32393279 |
Francesca Ingravallo1, Luca Vignatelli2, Uberto Pagotto1, Stefano Vandi3,4, Monica Moresco3,4, Anastasia Mangiaruga1, Claudia Oriolo1, Corrado Zenesini3, Fabio Pizza3,4, Giuseppe Plazzi3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Narcolepsy is a rare chronic sleep disorder that typically begins in youth. Excessive daytime sleepiness is the main disabling symptom, but the disease is often associated with severe endocrine-metabolic and psychosocial issues, worsened by a long diagnostic delay, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The scarcity of reference Sleep Centres forces the patient and family to travel for seeking medical consultations, increasing the economic and psychosocial burden of the disease. Growing evidence suggests that Telemedicine may facilitate patient access to sleep consultations and its non-inferiority in terms of patient satisfaction, adherence to treatment, and symptom improvement for sleep disorders. However, Telemedicine clinical and economic benefits for patients with narcolepsy are still unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Care; Diagnosis; Management; Narcolepsy; Quality of life; Sleep disorders; Sleepiness; Telemedicine; Televisit
Year: 2020 PMID: 32393279 PMCID: PMC7212602 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-01762-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Fig. 1Flowchart of the randomized controlled trial
Primary and secondary outcomes, measures and timepoints
| Outcomes | Measures | Timepoints (months) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | ||
| EDS | ESS (adults) [ ESS-CHAD [ | 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 incident patients 0, 6, 12 prevalent patients |
| Secondary | ||
| Other symptoms | Cataplexy diary, NSS [ CDI2 [ Global Impression Scale [ | 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 incident patients 0, 6, 12 prevalent patients |
| Compliance to treatment | Clinical consultation | 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 incident patients 0, 6, 12 prevalent patients |
| Weight | Standard weight scale provided to each patient | 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 incident patients 0, 6, 12 prevalent patients |
| Lipidic/glycaemic control* | Laboratory tests | 0, 12 |
| Caloric intake | Food diary | 0, 12 [0, 3, 6, 9, 12 patients with metabolic problems] |
| Physical activity | Short-IPAQ [ | 0, 12 [0, 3, 6, 9, 12 patients with metabolic problems] |
| Satisfaction index | CoTenar (patients and caregiver)** | 6, 12 |
| Quality of life | SF-36 (adults) [ PedsQL [ | 0, 6, 12 |
| Number (%) of full dropouts | At the time of censorship | |
| Number (%) of partial dropouts (patients changing procedure) | At the time of arm change | |
| Adverse drug reactions | Clinical consultation | 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 incident patients 0, 6, 12 prevalent patients |
| Costs and accidents | Interview (patients and caregivers) | 0, 6, 12 |
| Other feasibility indexes | Failure system report (physicians and patients) | After each TV |
*Glucose, insulin, HbA1c, triglycerides, total, LDL and HDL cholesterol, TSH, glycaemia, insulin, glycated haemoglobin, HDL, triglycerides, total, LDL, uricemia, TSH, FT4, FT3, complete blood count, AST, ALT, gamma-GT, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine. ** Adapted from CoSM-S [41]