| Literature DB >> 32393145 |
Qin Hu1, Haibo Hua1, Lihong Zhou1, Xingwu Zou1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The relationship between interleukin-8 (IL8) -251A/T polymorphism and tuberculosis (TB) risk remains controversial. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was performed by retrieving relevant studies from the available literature.Entities:
Keywords: IL8; IL8 − 251A/T polymorphism; Tuberculosis; genetic variant; interleukin-8 gene; meta-analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32393145 PMCID: PMC7218964 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520917877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Figure 1.PRISMA flow chart of included and excluded studies.
Study selection and subject characteristics of included studies in meta-analysis.
| First author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Cases | Controls | Genotypes for cases | Genotypes for controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT, AT, AA | TT, AT, AA | |||||||
| Ma[ | 2003 | USA | Caucasian | 106 | 107 | 23, 55, 28 | 42, 50, 15 | 0.98 |
| Ma[ | 2003 | USA | African | 180 | 167 | 8, 59, 113 | 23, 50, 94 | 0.00 |
| Cooke[ | 2004 | Gambia | African | 363 | 320 | 287, 69, 7 | 260, 57, 3 | 0.95 |
| Yang[ | 2010 | China | Asian | 167 | 167 | 33, 86, 48 | 68, 79, 20 | 0.69 |
| Lindenau[ | 2014 | Brazil | Mixed | 38 | 58 | 11, 19, 8 | 30, 24, 4 | 0.79 |
| Ma[ | 2016 | China | Asian | 438 | 536 | 144, 219, 75 | 188, 260, 88 | 0.91 |
HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Summary ORs and 95%CI of IL8 polymorphisms and TB risk.
| Test of heterogeneity | Test of association | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subgroup | Genetic model | Effects model | OR (95%CI) | |
| Overall | AA vs TT | Random | 76.9% (0.00) | 2.86 (1.46–5.60) |
| AT vs TT | Random | 62.8% (0.02) | 1.64 (1.15–2.34) | |
| Dominant model | Random | 75.7% (0.00) | 1.88 (1.24–2.86) | |
| Recessive model | Random | 62.1% (0.02) | 1.77 (1.17–2.69) | |
| Asian | AA vs TT | Random | 93.1% (0.00) | 2.29 (0.53–9.85) |
| AT vs TT | Random | 82.3% (0.02) | 1.52 (0.76–3.04) | |
| Dominant model | Random | 90.6% (0.00) | 1.71 (0.69–4.25) | |
| Recessive model | Random | 89.2% (0.00) | 1.72 (0.62–4.74) | |
| African | AA vs TT | Fixed | 0.0% (0.05) | 3.02 (1.47–6.20) |
| AT vs TT | Random | 80.8% (0.02) | 1.79 (0.60–5.38) | |
| Dominant model | Random | 81.9% (0.02) | 1.86 (0.64–5.41) | |
| Recessive model | Fixed | 0.0% (0.53) | 1.37 (0.91–2.06) | |
| HWE | AA vs TT | Random | 73.8% (0.00) | 2.77 (1.26–6.10) |
| AT vs TT | Random | 55.4% (0.05) | 1.49 (1.07–2.07) | |
| Dominant model | Random | 52.3% (0.00) | 1.72 (1.13–2.63) | |
| Recessive model | Random | 57.5% (0.01) | 2.01 (1.14–3.55) |
OR, odds ratio; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; IL8, interleukin 8 gene; TB, tuberculosis.
Figure 2.Forest plot for meta-analysis of the association between the IL8 −251A/T polymorphism and TB risk. Data points and horizontal lines indicate ORs and 95%CI, respectively; diamonds indicate I2 values. IL8, interleukin 8 gene; TB, tuberculosis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3.Sensitivity analysis of the association between the IL8 −251A/T polymorphism and TB risk. IL8, interleukin 8 gene; TB, tuberculosis; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4.Begg’s funnel plot analysis to detect potential publication bias for IL8–251A/T polymorphism. IL8, interleukin 8 gene; TB, tuberculosis; logOR, logarithm of the odds ratio; s.e., standard error.