Muhammad Waqas1,2, Maxim Mokin3, Jaims Lim1,2, Kunal Vakharia1,2, Michael E Springer4, Karen M Meess4, Richard W Ducharme4, Ciprian N Ionita5, Swetadri Vasan Setlur Nagesh1,5, Liza C Gutierrez5, Kenneth V Snyder1,2, Jason M Davies1,2,4,6, Elad I Levy1,2,4,5, Adnan H Siddiqui1,2,4,5,7. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York. 3. Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. 4. Jacobs Institute, Buffalo, New York. 5. Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. 6. Department of Bioinformatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. 7. Department of Radiology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has revolutionized training, education, and device testing. Understanding the design and physical properties of 3D-printed models is important. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the design, physical properties, accuracy, and experimental outcomes of 3D-printed vascular models used in neurointervention. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature between January 1, 2000 and September 30, 2018. Public/Publisher MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Compendex, Cochrane, and Inspec databases were searched using Medical Subject Heading terms for design and physical attributes of 3D-printed models for neurointervention. Information on design and physical properties like compliance, lubricity, flow system, accuracy, and outcome measures were collected. RESULTS: A total of 23 articles were included. Nine studies described 3D-printed models for stroke intervention. Tango Plus (Stratasys) was the most common material used to develop these models. Four studies described a population-representative geometry model. All other studies reported patient-specific vascular geometry. Eight studies reported complete reconstruction of the circle of Willis, anterior, and posterior circulation. Four studies reported a model with extracranial vasculature. One prototype study reported compliance and lubricity. Reported circulation systems included manual flushing, programmable pistons, peristaltic, and pulsatile pumps. Outcomes included thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, post-thrombectomy flow restoration, surgical performance, and qualitative feedback. CONCLUSION: Variations exist in the material, design, and extent of reconstruction of vasculature of 3D-printed models. There is a need for objective characterization of 3D-printed vascular models. We propose the development of population representative 3D-printed models for skill improvement or device testing.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has revolutionized training, education, and device testing. Understanding the design and physical properties of 3D-printed models is important. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the design, physical properties, accuracy, and experimental outcomes of 3D-printed vascular models used in neurointervention. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature between January 1, 2000 and September 30, 2018. Public/Publisher MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Compendex, Cochrane, and Inspec databases were searched using Medical Subject Heading terms for design and physical attributes of 3D-printed models for neurointervention. Information on design and physical properties like compliance, lubricity, flow system, accuracy, and outcome measures were collected. RESULTS: A total of 23 articles were included. Nine studies described 3D-printed models for stroke intervention. Tango Plus (Stratasys) was the most common material used to develop these models. Four studies described a population-representative geometry model. All other studies reported patient-specific vascular geometry. Eight studies reported complete reconstruction of the circle of Willis, anterior, and posterior circulation. Four studies reported a model with extracranial vasculature. One prototype study reported compliance and lubricity. Reported circulation systems included manual flushing, programmable pistons, peristaltic, and pulsatile pumps. Outcomes included thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, post-thrombectomy flow restoration, surgical performance, and qualitative feedback. CONCLUSION: Variations exist in the material, design, and extent of reconstruction of vasculature of 3D-printed models. There is a need for objective characterization of 3D-printed vascular models. We propose the development of population representative 3D-printed models for skill improvement or device testing.
Authors: Yang Liu; Mehdi Abbasi; Jorge L Arturo Larco; Ramanathan Kadirvel; David F Kallmes; Waleed Brinjikji; Luis Savastano Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 8.572
Authors: Oriane Poupart; Riccardo Conti; Andreas Schmocker; Lucio Pancaldi; Christophe Moser; Katja M Nuss; Mahmut S Sakar; Tomas Dobrocky; Hansjörg Grützmacher; Pascal J Mosimann; Dominique P Pioletti Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2021-01-20