Literature DB >> 32392258

Genetic algorithm-based personalized models of human cardiac action potential.

Dmitrii Smirnov1, Andrey Pikunov1, Roman Syunyaev1,2,3, Ruslan Deviatiiarov4, Oleg Gusev4, Kedar Aras2, Anna Gams2, Aaron Koppel2, Igor R Efimov1,2.   

Abstract

We present a novel modification of genetic algorithm (GA) which determines personalized parameters of cardiomyocyte electrophysiology model based on set of experimental human action potential (AP) recorded at different heart rates. In order to find the steady state solution, the optimized algorithm performs simultaneous search in the parametric and slow variables spaces. We demonstrate that several GA modifications are required for effective convergence. Firstly, we used Cauchy mutation along a random direction in the parametric space. Secondly, relatively large number of elite organisms (6-10% of the population passed on to new generation) was required for effective convergence. Test runs with synthetic AP as input data indicate that algorithm error is low for high amplitude ionic currents (1.6±1.6% for IKr, 3.2±3.5% for IK1, 3.9±3.5% for INa, 8.2±6.3% for ICaL). Experimental signal-to-noise ratio above 28 dB was required for high quality GA performance. GA was validated against optical mapping recordings of human ventricular AP and mRNA expression profile of donor hearts. In particular, GA output parameters were rescaled proportionally to mRNA levels ratio between patients. We have demonstrated that mRNA-based models predict the AP waveform dependence on heart rate with high precision. The latter also provides a novel technique of model personalization that makes it possible to map gene expression profile to cardiac function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32392258      PMCID: PMC7213718          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  32 in total

1.  Hysteresis effect implicates calcium cycling as a mechanism of repolarization alternans.

Authors:  Mariah L Walker; Xiaoping Wan; Glenn E Kirsch; David S Rosenbaum
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Exploiting mathematical models to illuminate electrophysiological variability between individuals.

Authors:  Amrita X Sarkar; David J Christini; Eric A Sobie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Interactive visualization and analysis of large-scale sequencing datasets using ZENBU.

Authors:  Jessica Severin; Marina Lizio; Jayson Harshbarger; Hideya Kawaji; Carsten O Daub; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Nicolas Bertin; Alistair R R Forrest
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  The role of dynamic instability and wavelength in arrhythmia maintenance as revealed by panoramic imaging with blebbistatin vs. 2,3-butanedione monoxime.

Authors:  Qing Lou; Wenwen Li; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Delayed rectifier K currents have reduced amplitudes and altered kinetics in myocytes from infarcted canine ventricle.

Authors:  M Jiang; C Cabo; J Yao; P A Boyden; G Tseng
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Critical Volume of Human Myocardium Necessary to Maintain Ventricular Fibrillation.

Authors:  Kedar K Aras; Ndeye Rokhaya Faye; Brianna Cathey; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-11

Review 7.  "Good enough solutions" and the genetics of complex diseases.

Authors:  James N Weiss; Alain Karma; W Robb MacLellan; Mario Deng; Christoph D Rau; Colin M Rees; Jessica Wang; Nicholas Wisniewski; Eleazar Eskin; Steve Horvath; Zhilin Qu; Yibin Wang; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation.

Authors:  Davis J McCarthy; Yunshun Chen; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Cell-specific cardiac electrophysiology models.

Authors:  Willemijn Groenendaal; Francis A Ortega; Armen R Kherlopian; Andrew C Zygmunt; Trine Krogh-Madsen; David J Christini
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  MOIRAI: a compact workflow system for CAGE analysis.

Authors:  Akira Hasegawa; Carsten Daub; Piero Carninci; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Timo Lassmann
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  Correction: Genetic algorithm-based personalized models of human cardiac action potential.

Authors:  Dmitrii Smirnov; Andrey Pikunov; Roman Syunyaev; Ruslan Deviatiiarov; Oleg Gusev; Kedar Aras; Anna Gams; Aaron Koppel; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Minimally invasive system to reliably characterize ventricular electrophysiology from living donors.

Authors:  Aida Oliván-Viguera; María Pérez-Zabalza; Laura García-Mendívil; Konstantinos A Mountris; Sofía Orós-Rodrigo; Estel Ramos-Marquès; José María Vallejo-Gil; Pedro Carlos Fresneda-Roldán; Javier Fañanás-Mastral; Manuel Vázquez-Sancho; Marta Matamala-Adell; Fernando Sorribas-Berjón; Javier André Bellido-Morales; Francisco Javier Mancebón-Sierra; Alexánder Sebastián Vaca-Núñez; Carlos Ballester-Cuenca; Miguel Ángel Marigil; Cristina Pastor; Laura Ordovás; Ralf Köhler; Emiliano Diez; Esther Pueyo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Creation and application of virtual patient cohorts of heart models.

Authors:  S A Niederer; Y Aboelkassem; C D Cantwell; C Corrado; S Coveney; E M Cherry; T Delhaas; F H Fenton; A V Panfilov; P Pathmanathan; G Plank; M Riabiz; C H Roney; R W Dos Santos; L Wang
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  A Parameter Representing Missing Charge Should Be Considered when Calibrating Action Potential Models.

Authors:  Yann-Stanislas H M Barral; Joseph G Shuttleworth; Michael Clerx; Dominic G Whittaker; Ken Wang; Liudmila Polonchuk; David J Gavaghan; Gary R Mirams
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  An in silico hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocyte Model Built With Genetic Algorithm.

Authors:  Akwasi D Akwaboah; Bright Tsevi; Pascal Yamlome; Jacqueline A Treat; Maila Brucal-Hallare; Jonathan M Cordeiro; Makarand Deo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.