Literature DB >> 32391192

The ambiguous role of FPR1 in immunity and inflammation.

Erika Vacchelli1,2,3, Julie Le Naour1,2,3,4, Guido Kroemer1,2,3,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32391192      PMCID: PMC7199809          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1760061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


× No keyword cloud information.
Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are pattern recognition receptors (PPRs) that are involved in multiple pathological processes. These G protein-coupled receptors expressed by immune cells transduce chemotactic signals to trigger cell adhesion, migration, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as tissue repair and angiogenesis.[1] Among the three FPRs known in humans (FPR1, FPR2 and FPR3), most studies have focused on FPR1.[2] Their main ligands, N-formylated peptides, are either produced by invading bacteria or released from degrading mitochondrial proteins contained in dying host cells.[1] Although FPRs are expressed in various immune cells[1,3] among which neutrophils, macrophages, natural killer and dendritic cells, studies on FPR1 functions mostly focus on neutrophils, which often are the leukocytes to migrate toward the site of inflammation.[2] FPR1 has an ambivalent role in pathogenic processes (Figure 1). In some diseases, FPR1 has a positive effect. In the context of infection by Escherichia coli[4] and Listeria monocytogenes,[5] a genetic FPR1 deficiency (genotype: Fpr1) compromises pathogen elimination in mice, therefore, increasing mortality. Indeed, in the context of bacterial infection, FPRs induce trafficking of phagocytes to the site of microbial invasion and increase the phagocytic destruction of the pathogens.[6] In cancers developing on Fpr1 mice, the recruitment and positioning of dendritic cells into the tumor bed (and not that of neutrophils as in many other scenarios) is reduced in response to chemotherapy, thereby compromising the antitumor immune response required for chemotherapy to be efficient.[7,8] FPR1 has several endogenous ligands including Annexin A1 (ANXA1), cathepsin G (CTSG), family with sequence similarity 19 (chemokine (C-C motif)-like) member A4 (FAM19A4) and N-formylated peptides contained in mitochondria. In vivo experiments revealed that only the deletion of the gene coding for Annexin A1 (ANXA1) compromised the capacity of dying cancer cells to induce anticancer immune responses.[7] Thus, the cancer immunosurveillance-relevant ligand of FPR1 appears to be ANXA1.
Figure 1.

Positive and negative roles of FPR1 in disease pathogenesis.

Abbreviations: DC, dendritic cell; FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein.

Positive and negative roles of FPR1 in disease pathogenesis. Abbreviations: DC, dendritic cell; FPR1, formyl peptide receptor 1; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein. In sharp contrast, in many other diseases, FPR1 has negative effects, meaning that its neutralization might be considered as a therapeutic intervention. For example, Fpr1 mice are protected against infection by Yersinia pestis, in line with the discovery that FPR1 acts as the receptor for this pathogen, which is the causative agent of human plague.[9] Moreover, Fpr1 mice subjected to ischemia-reperfusion damage to the heart present reduced inflammation, cardiomyocyte apoptosis and ventricular remodeling, accompanied by the inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway.[10] Similarly, FPR1 plays a negative role in celiac disease, a highly prevalent autoimmune disorder that can be attenuated but not cured by a gluten-free diet. Indeed, FPR1 promotes the proinflammatory migration of neutrophils into the gut following exposure to gliadin (the pathogenic component of gluten).[11] Acute endotoxin-induce lung injury is also attenuated in Fpr1 mice commensurate with reduced local neutrophil recruitment.[12] Similarly, Fpr1 mice are protected from cigarette smoking-induced lung emphysema, coupled to a drastic reduction in the migration of neutrophils and macrophages to the lung after smoke exposure.[13] Indeed, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exhibiting an increased expression of FPR1 on peripheral neutrophils and in bronchoalveolar fluids.[13] Finally, Fpr1 mice do not develop pulmonary fibrosis in response to intratracheal bleomycin challenge and failed to recruit neutrophils to the damaged lungs.[2] Adoptive transfer experiments allowed to conclude that the cell type that has to express FPR1 to cause bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis is neutrophils, underscoring the importance of this leukocyte subpopulation for disease pathogenesis.[2] Of note, more than 200 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been described for FPR1, and this heterogeneity could influence the functional (positive or negative) role of the gene in various diseases. In some cases, such as aggressive periodontitis[14] or exudative age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy[15] a functional defect of the gene constitutes a potential risk factor. In the context of cancer, the loss-of-function variation rs867228 (G346A affecting the intracellular C-terminus of FPR1) is associated with reduced survival in breast and colorectal cancer patients treated by immunogenic chemotherapy.[7] FPR1 rs5030880 (R190 W affecting the extracellular loop 2 of FPR1) may constitute plague resistance allele. Indeed, monocytes from individuals bearing this polymorphism exhibit a reduced migration toward formylated peptides or Y. pestis.[9] Given the ambiguity of FPR1 in the pathogenesis of disease (Figure 1), from a teleological point of view, it might be important to maintain a heterogeneity in the population that then would constitute an equilibrated mix of individuals some of which, for example, are resistant against some infectious agents (Y. pestis and endotoxin-induced lung damage in the case of a loss-of-function allele) at the cost of being more susceptible to other pathogens (E. coli and L. monocytogenes, for the loss-of-function allele) and vice versa. Indeed, rs5030880 occurs in ~12% of Caucasians as well as in ~9% of Africans and Afro-Americans and in ~18% of Asians. Similarly, a sizable fraction of the population (~30% of Caucasians) harbors the loss-of-function allele of rs867228. As an aside, such functionally relevant polymorphisms may impact anticancer immunosurveillance requiring functional dendritic cells[7] as well as chronic inflammation mediated by FPR1 expressing macrophages[3] and neutrophils.[2] It will be important to determine the impact of genetic polymorphisms affecting FPRs and other PRRs in more detail, in a systematic fashion, to understand their importance in the initiation and resolution of inflammatory and immune responses.
FPR1formyl peptide receptor 1
SNPsingle nucleotide polymorphism.
  15 in total

1.  Chemotherapy-induced antitumor immunity requires formyl peptide receptor 1.

Authors:  Erika Vacchelli; Yuting Ma; Elisa E Baracco; Antonella Sistigu; David P Enot; Federico Pietrocola; Heng Yang; Sandy Adjemian; Kariman Chaba; Michaela Semeraro; Michele Signore; Adele De Ninno; Valeria Lucarini; Francesca Peschiaroli; Luca Businaro; Annamaria Gerardino; Gwenola Manic; Thomas Ulas; Patrick Günther; Joachim L Schultze; Oliver Kepp; Gautier Stoll; Céline Lefebvre; Claire Mulot; Francesca Castoldi; Sylvie Rusakiewicz; Sylvain Ladoire; Lionel Apetoh; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Monica Lucattelli; Cécile Delarasse; Valérie Boige; Michel Ducreux; Suzette Delaloge; Christophe Borg; Fabrice André; Giovanna Schiavoni; Ilio Vitale; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Fabrizio Mattei; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Formyl peptide receptors at the interface of inflammation, angiogenesis and tumor growth.

Authors:  Nella Prevete; Federica Liotti; Gianni Marone; Rosa Marina Melillo; Amato de Paulis
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 7.658

3.  FPR1 gene silencing suppresses cardiomyocyte apoptosis and ventricular remodeling in rats with ischemia/reperfusion injury through the inhibition of MAPK signaling pathway.

Authors:  Qing-Ling Zhou; Fei Teng; Yong-Shan Zhang; Qiang Sun; Yan-Xia Cao; Guo-Wei Meng
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  A Critical Role of Formyl Peptide Receptors in Host Defense against Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Meihua Zhang; Ji-Liang Gao; Keqiang Chen; Teizo Yoshimura; Weiwei Liang; Wanghua Gong; Xiaoqing Li; Jiaqiang Huang; David H McDermott; Philip M Murphy; Xietong Wang; Ji Ming Wang
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Neutrophil formylpeptide receptor single nucleotide polymorphism 348T>C in aggressive periodontitis.

Authors:  Pooja Maney; Pinar Emecen; John S Mills; John D Walters
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  FPR1 interacts with CFH, HTRA1 and smoking in exudative age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

Authors:  X Y Liang; L J Chen; T K Ng; J Tuo; J-L Gao; P O S Tam; T Y Y Lai; C-C Chan; C P Pang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  FPR-1 is an important regulator of neutrophil recruitment and a tissue-specific driver of pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Jack Leslie; Ben Jm Millar; Alicia Del Carpio Pons; Rachel A Burgoyne; Joseph D Frost; Ben S Barksby; Saimir Luli; Jon Scott; A John Simpson; Jack Gauldie; Lynne A Murray; Donna K Finch; Alan M Carruthers; John Ferguson; Matthew A Sleeman; David Rider; Rachel Howarth; Christopher Fox; Fiona Oakley; Andrew J Fisher; Derek A Mann; Lee A Borthwick
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-02-27

8.  Formylpeptide receptors are critical for rapid neutrophil mobilization in host defense against Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Mingyong Liu; Keqiang Chen; Teizo Yoshimura; Ying Liu; Wanghua Gong; Aimin Wang; Ji-Liang Gao; Philip M Murphy; Ji Ming Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Regulation of the formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) gene in primary human macrophages.

Authors:  Claudio Gemperle; Mattia Schmid; Magdalena Herova; Jacqueline Marti-Jaun; Sophia J A Wuest; Christa Loretz; Martin Hersberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Ilio Vitale; Sarah Warren; Sandy Adjemian; Patrizia Agostinis; Aitziber Buqué Martinez; Timothy A Chan; George Coukos; Sandra Demaria; Eric Deutsch; Dobrin Draganov; Richard L Edelson; Silvia C Formenti; Jitka Fucikova; Lucia Gabriele; Udo S Gaipl; Sofia R Gameiro; Abhishek D Garg; Encouse Golden; Jian Han; Kevin J Harrington; Akseli Hemminki; James W Hodge; Dewan Md Sakib Hossain; Tim Illidge; Michael Karin; Howard L Kaufman; Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer; Juan Jose Lasarte; Sherene Loi; Michael T Lotze; Gwenola Manic; Taha Merghoub; Alan A Melcher; Karen L Mossman; Felipe Prosper; Øystein Rekdal; Maria Rescigno; Chiara Riganti; Antonella Sistigu; Mark J Smyth; Radek Spisek; John Stagg; Bryan E Strauss; Daolin Tang; Kazuki Tatsuno; Stefaan W van Gool; Peter Vandenabeele; Takahiro Yamazaki; Dmitriy Zamarin; Laurence Zitvogel; Alessandra Cesano; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 13.751

View more
  10 in total

1.  Combined screening analysis of aberrantly methylated-differentially expressed genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jisen Cao; Ruiqiang Zhang; Ye Zhang; Yijun Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-02

2.  An independent predictor of poor prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer: rs867228 in formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1).

Authors:  Shu-Fen Chiang; Kevin Chih-Yang Huang; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Tsung-Wei Chen; Tao-Wei Ke; K S Clifford Chao
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 3.  Role of Mitochondria-Derived Danger Signals Released After Injury in Systemic Inflammation and Sepsis.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Itagaki; Ingred Riça; Barbora Konecna; Hyo In Kim; Jinbong Park; Elzbieta Kaczmarek; Carl J Hauser
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 7.468

4.  A major genetic accelerator of cancer diagnosis: rs867228 in FPR1.

Authors:  Zsofia Sztupinszki; Julie Le Naour; Erika Vacchelli; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Suzette Delaloge; Zoltan Szallasi; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  No impact of cancer and plague-relevant FPR1 polymorphisms on COVID-19.

Authors:  Adriana Petrazzuolo; Julie Le Naour; Erika Vacchelli; Pascale Gaussem; Syrine Ellouze; Georges Jourdi; Eric Solary; Michaela Fontenay; David M Smadja; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  Identification of Immune Subtypes of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Integrative Genome-Scale Analysis.

Authors:  Liyuan Yin; Wen Zhang; Dan Pu; Xiaoqian Zhai; Yiyun Lin; Qiang Wu; Tangel Chang; Jia Hu; Yan Li; Qinghua Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Role of Mitochondrial Nucleic Acid Sensing Pathways in Health and Patho-Physiology.

Authors:  Arpita Chowdhury; Steffen Witte; Abhishek Aich
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Integrated Bioinformatics-Based Analysis of Hub Genes and the Mechanism of Immune Infiltration Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yanze Wu; Ting Jiang; Jinghai Hua; Zhiping Xiong; Hui Chen; Lei Li; Jingtian Peng; Wenjun Xiong
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-06

9.  Bioinformatics analysis of potential pathogenesis and risk genes of immunoinflammation-promoted renal injury in severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Zhimin Chen; Caiming Chen; Fengbin Chen; Ruilong Lan; Guo Lin; Yanfang Xu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 10.  The immune system as a driver of mitochondrial disease pathogenesis: a review of evidence.

Authors:  Allison Hanaford; Simon C Johnson
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.303

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.