Literature DB >> 32390719

Influences of Lateral Jump Smash Actions in Different Situations on the Lower Extremity Load of Badminton Players.

Chia-Ling Hung1, Min-Hao Hung2, Chi-Yao Chang2, Hsin-Huan Wang2, Chin-Shan Ho2, Kuo-Chuan Lin3.   

Abstract

Badminton atypical actions and hitting movements often occur during the game; therefore, many special footwork methods have been developed to facilitate the rapid movements required to hit the shuttlecock, including quick turning and jumping and quick directional change movements. Studies have shown that the majority of badminton sport injuries occur in the lower extremity joints of athletes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of hitting motion and unanticipated hitting direction on landing mechanics after backhand lateral jump smashing and landing to analyze joint stiffness and torque changes in three lower extremity joints. Recruited sixteen badminton athletes.The capture frequency of the Vicon Motion System (300Hz), Kistler force platform (1500Hz) and Vicon Nexus Version 1.8.5 software were used simultaneously to capture the kinematic and kinetic parameter of backhand side lateral jump smash footwork. The swing actions were divided into two situations, shadow (footwork and racket swinging practice without targets) and hitting (footwork and stroke shuttlecock) actions, whereas the directions were divided into directional and non-directional. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA with the LSD correction was used to compare the differences among the four conditions. The significance level was set to a = 0.05. Results shown that, at the peak of torque, the ankle plantar flexion of the non-directional shadow (p < 0.05) were greater than that of directional shadow (p < 0.05); meantime, ankle torque change of non-directional shadow (p < 0.05) and directional hitting (p < 0.05) was lower than that of non-directional hitting, but the non-directional hitting was larger compared to non-directional shadow (p < 0.05) at the maximum vertical GRF. The hip extension at peak of torque of directional hitting were larger than that of non-directional shadow (p < 0.05). The shadow actions hip flexion angle was larger than that of directional hitting at initial contact, but the non-directional hitting hip abduction was has the significant difference among all the conditioning. The hip flexion angle of non-directional shadow was larger than that of directional hitting (p < 0.05), the hip abduction angle of the non-directional hitting was greater than that of non-directional shadow (p < 0.05) at the peak VGRF. Elite badminton players execute different training movements; the joint stiffness was in the same state. In the hitting actions has greater ankle and hip joint torque than shadow actions. The badminton player was change joint range of motion to adjust lower limbs stiffness. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lower extremity joint stiffness; footwork training; internal joint torque; jump landing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32390719      PMCID: PMC7196745     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  33 in total

1.  Visual characteristics of clay target shooters.

Authors:  B Abernethy; R J Neal
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.319

2.  Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton.

Authors:  D Cabello Manrique; J J González-Badillo
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  A biomechanical analysis of common lunge tasks in badminton.

Authors:  Gregor Kuntze; Neil Mansfield; William Sellers
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Sex differences in lower extremity biomechanics during single leg landings.

Authors:  Randy J Schmitz; Anthony S Kulas; David H Perrin; Bryan L Riemann; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Lower limb coordination and stiffness during landing from volleyball block jumps.

Authors:  Gerwyn Hughes; James Watkins
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.674

6.  An investigation of lower extremity energy dissipation strategies during single-leg and double-leg landing based on sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics.

Authors:  Chen Hua Yeow; Peter Vee Sin Lee; James Cho Hong Goh
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  The effects of 2 landing techniques on knee kinematics, kinetics, and performance during stop-jump and side-cutting tasks.

Authors:  Boyi Dai; William E Garrett; Michael T Gross; Darin A Padua; Robin M Queen; Bing Yu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Contribution of knee flexor and extensor strength on sex-specific energy absorption and torsional joint stiffness during drop jumping.

Authors:  Randy J Schmitz; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Increased knee valgus alignment and moment during single-leg landing after overhead stroke as a potential risk factor of anterior cruciate ligament injury in badminton.

Authors:  Yuka Kimura; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Yuji Yamamoto; Yoshimitsu Hayashi; Shuichi Sato
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  A Prospective Epidemiological Study of Injuries in Japanese National Tournament-Level Badminton Players From Junior High School to University.

Authors:  Eiji Miyake; Mitsunobu Yatsunami; Jun Kurabayashi; Koji Teruya; Yasuhiro Sekine; Tatsuaki Endo; Ryuichiro Nishida; Nao Takano; Seiko Sato; Han Jae Kyung
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2016-03-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Adjusted Landing Technique Reduces the Load on the Achilles Tendon in Badminton Players.

Authors:  Niels Christian Kaldau; Niels Jensby Nedergaard; Per Hölmich; Jesper Bencke
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.