Literature DB >> 32390367

Clinical Features and Outcomes of 98 Patients Hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Daegu, South Korea: A Brief Descriptive Study.

Kyung Soo Hong1, Kwan Ho Lee1, Jin Hong Chung1, Kyeong Cheol Shin1, Eun Young Choi1, Hyun Jung Jin1, Jong Geol Jang1, Wonhwa Lee2, June Hong Ahn3.   

Abstract

Although some information on the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and a few selected cases has been reported, data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized therewith in South Korea are lacking. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of 98 consecutive hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at Yeungnam University Medical Center in Daegu, South Korea. Sixty patients were women (61.2%), and the mean age was 55.4±17.1 years. Thirteen patients (13.3%) were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). The mean interval from symptom onset to hospitalization was 7.7±4.5 days. Patients who received ICU care were significantly older and were more likely to have diabetes mellitus. The National Early Warning Score on the day of admission was significantly higher in patients requiring ICU care. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (13/13 patients; 100%), septic shock (9/13; 69.2%), acute cardiac injury (9/13; 69.2%), and acute kidney injury (8/13; 61.5%) were more common in patients who received ICU care. All patients received antibiotic therapy, and most (97/98 patients; 99.0%) received antiviral therapy (lopinavir/ritonavir). Hydroxychloroquine was used in 79 patients (80.6%), and glucocorticoid therapy was used in 18 patients (18.4%). In complete blood counts, lymphopenia was the most common finding (40/98 patients; 40.8%). Levels of all proinflammatory cytokines were significantly higher in ICU patients. As of March 29, 2020, the mortality rate was 5.1%. Here, we report the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of SARS-CoV-2 patients in South Korea up to March 29, 2020. © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Coronavirus; Korea; SARS-CoV-2; clinical characteristics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32390367      PMCID: PMC7214108          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.5.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


In December 2019, a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic causing pneumonia began in Wuhan, China. By March 29, 2020, 9583 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had been diagnosed in South Korea. Although several Chinese studies have described the clinical characteristics of COVID-19,123 there are no such studies for Korea. As patient-, disease-, physician-, and healthcare systemrelated factors can be associated with mortality from COVID-19, we sought to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 patients admitted to Yeungnam University Medical Center in Daegu, South Korea up to March 29, 2020, as well as laboratory findings. This study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yeungnam University Hospital (YUH IRB 2020-03-057). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective study design. The final date of follow-up was March 29, 2020. Patient electronic medical records were reviewed. Clinical data included age, sex, exposure history, comorbidities, symptoms, vital signs, radiologic findings, complications, treatment, clinical outcomes, and laboratory findings. Blood samples of some suspected cases were collected for proinflammatory cytokine analysis. The concentrations of cytokines in COVID-19 were determined using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is an early warning score facilitating the early detection of and responses to patient deterioration.4 NEWS encompasses seven physiological parameters: pulse oximetry, oxygen, pulse, systolic blood pressure, respiration rate, temperature, and central nervous system status. Each parameter is assigned a score of 0 to 3 points. The score reflects the extent to which the parameter differs from the standard. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was defined according to the Berlin definition.5 Septic shock was defined according to the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3).6 Acute cardiac injury was defined as a serum troponin I level above the 99th percentile upper reference limit or new abnormal electrocardiography and echocardiography findings.2 Acute kidney injury was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Guidelines (KDIGO) for acute kidney injury.7 The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), a severity of disease classification system,8 is widely used as an index of illness severity and as a predictor of outcomes.9 APACHE II score is based on age, previous health status, and the initial values of 12 physiological measurements. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale is a scoring system deigned to evaluate complications in critically ill patients.10 The SOFA scale assigns a score of 0 to 4 to each of six parameters related to organ function (respiration, coagulation, liver, cardiovascular, central nervous system, and renal). Continuous variables are expressed as means±standard deviations (SDs) and were compared using Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the chisquared test or Fisher's exact test. In all analyses, a two-tailed p value<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Table 1 shows the baseline clinical characteristics and radiological findings of patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study included 98 patients with SARS-CoV-2, 13 (13.3%) of whom were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Sixty patients were women (61.2%) and their mean age was 55.4±17.1 years, similar to recently released national epidemiological data for Korea.11 The mean interval from symptom onset to hospitalization was 7.7 days. Similar to the national epidemiological data,11 the largest group in our study with a history of exposure was the Shincheonji religious group, which comprised 47 patients (48.0%). In our study, the proportion of patients over 50 years of age was 70.4%, compared to 44% in China. The large proportion of women over 50 years of age in our research is thought to be related to the outbreak in the Shincheonji religious group whose followers comprise a female majority.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics and Radiological Findings of Patients Admitted to Yeungnam University Medical Center with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

CharacteristicsAll patients (n=98)ICU (n=13)Non-ICU (n=85)p value
Age (yr)55.4±17.163.2±10.154.2±17.70.014
 21–4929 (29.6)1 (7.7)28 (32.9)0.054
 50–6440 (40.8)6 (46.2)34 (40.0)
 ≥6529 (29.6)6 (46.2)23 (27.1)
Sex0.558
 Male38 (38.8)6 (46.2)32 (37.6)
 Female60 (61.2)7 (53.8)53 (62.4)
Interval from symptom onset to hospital admission (day)7.7±4.54.7±3.18.2±4.60.009
Exposure history
Shincheonji follower47 (48.0)2 (15.4)45 (52.9)0.012
Comorbidities38 (38.8)5 (38.5)33 (38.8)0.980
 Cardiovascular disease11 (11.2)0 (0)11 (12.9)0.350
 Cerebrovascular disease2 (2.0)0 (0))2 (2.4)1.000
 Chronic lung disease3 (3.1)0 (0)3 (3.5)1.000
 Dementia3 (3.1)0 (0)3 (3.5)1.000
 Diabetes mellitus9 (9.2)3 (23.1)6 (7.1)0.096
 Hypertension30 (30.6)5 (38.5)25 (29.4)0.529
 Liver disease1 (1.0)0 (0)1 (1.2)1.000
 Malignancy4 (4.1)1 (7.7)3 (3.5)0.439
 Parkinson’s disease1 (1.0)1 (7.7)0 (0)0.133
Symptoms on admission
 Fever62 (63.3)8 (61.5)54 (63.5)1.000
 Cough58 (59.2)6 (46.2)52 (61.2)0.305
 Sputum39 (39.8)2 (15.4)37 (43.5)0.054
 Myalgia37 (37.8)3 (23.1)34 (40.0)0.359
 Dyspnea32 (32.7)8 (61.5)24 (28.2)0.026
Vital signs on admission
 Body temperature, ℃37.3±0.737.5±0.937.3±0.70.321
 Heart rate, beats/min84.7±16.183.5±20.484.9±15.50.321
 Respiratory rate22.3±9.530.0±18.621.2±6.70.115
 Systolic BP, mm Hg127.9±18.4135.5±20.3126.7±18.00.109
 Diastolic BP, mm Hg80.2±12.484.4±11.679.6±12.50.199
 Mean arterial BP, mm Hg96.1±12.9101.4±14.184.4±11.60.111
NEWS2.6±3.07.8±2.91.8±2.2<0.001
 Respiratory rate0.4±0.81.3±1.30.2±0.60.011
 Peripheral oxygen saturation0.7±1.12.5±1.00.4±0.8<0.001
 Supplemental oxygen0.5±0.91.8±0.60.3±0.7<0.001
 Body temperature0.1±0.30.1±0.30.1±0.40.530
 Systolic BP0.5±0.90.9±1.10.4±0.80.039
 Heart rate0.3±0.60.8±1.00.3±0.40.055
 Level of consciousness0.1±0.50.2±0.80.1±0.50.509
Radiological findings0.657
 Chest X-ray only34 (34.7)6 (46.2)28 (32.9)
 Chest X-ray and CT64 (65.3)7 (53.8)57 (67.1)
 Unilateral pneumonia14 (14.3)1 (7.7)13 (15.3)
 Bilateral pneumonia34 (34.7)8 (61.5)26 (30.6)
 Multiple ground-glass opacity42 (42.9)4 (30.8)38 (44.7)

BP, blood pressure; CT, computed tomography; ICU, intensive care unit; NEWS, National Early Warning Score; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Data are presented as a mean±SD or number (percentage).

More than one comorbidity was present in 38 patients (38.8%), of whom 30 (30.6%) had hypertension; this was the most prevalent comorbidity. A recent study in China revealed that patients who required ICU care were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease than patients who did not receive ICU care.2 In our study, diabetes mellitus tended to be more common in ICU patients (23.1% vs. 7.1%, p=0.096). It was difficult to detect meaningful differences in comorbidities between patients treated in the ICU and those who were not due to the relatively small number of patients. On admission, about 60% of the patients had a fever and cough, and one-third had sputum, myalgia, and dyspnea. Interestingly, vital signs recorded on the day of admission did not differ between patients who did and did not require ICU care. NEWS values on the day of admission was significantly higher in patients requiring ICU care (7.8±2.9 vs. 1.8±2.2, p<0.001). Of the NEWS parameters, body temperature, heart rate, and level of consciousness were not associated with ICU care. The Royal College of Physicians recommend the use of NEWS to identify patients at risk of cardiac arrest, unanticipated ICU admission, or death. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves of NEWS for predicting unanticipated ICU admission was 0.857 ([95% confidence interval (CI), 0.847–0.868] in a previous study.4 Our study demonstrated that NEWS was more useful than initial vital signs in predicting ICU admission in patients with COVID-19. Table 2 shows the complications, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of the patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. As previously reported in a Chinese study,2 our patients who required ICU care had many complications, such as multiple organ failure. ARDS (18/98 patients; 18.4%), septic shock (9/98; 9.2%), acute cardiac injury (11/98; 11.2%), and acute kidney injury (9/98; 9.2%) were more frequent in our study than in other Chinese studies.12312 It is estimated that the severity of disease in the COVID-19 patients enrolled in this study was higher than that of the patients in Chinese studies. The greater disease severity may account for higher rates of use of invasive mechanical ventilation (11.2%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4.1%), and continuous renal replacement therapy (3.1%) than reported in the aforementioned Chinese studies.
Table 2

Complications, Treatment, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

All patients (n=98)ICU (n=13)Non-ICU (n=85)p value
Complications
 ARDS18 (18.4)13 (100)5 (5.9)<0.001
 Septic shock9 (9.2)9 (69.2)0 (0)<0.001
 Acute cardiac injury11 (11.2)9 (69.2)2 (2.4)<0.001
 Acute kidney injury9 (9.2)8 (61.5)1 (1.2)<0.001
Treatment
 Oxygen37 (37.8)12 (92.3)25 (29.4)<0.001
 HFNC12 (12.2)7 (53.8)5 (5.9)<0.001
 IMV11 (11.2)11 (84.6)0 (0)<0.001
 CRRT3 (3.1)3 (23.1)0 (0)0.002
 ECMO4 (4.1)4 (30.8)0 (0)<0.001
 Antibiotics98 (100)13 (100)85 (100)
 Lopinavir/ritonavir97 (99.0)13 (100)84 (98.8)1.000
 Hydroxychloroquine79 (80.6)13 (100)66 (77.6)0.067
 Glucocorticoid18 (18.4)10 (76.9)8 (9.4)<0.001
Clinical outcomes0.004
 Remains in hospital57 (58.2)7 (53.8)50 (58.8)
 Discharged30 (30.6)1 (7.7)29 (34.1)
 Died5 (5.1)4 (30.8)1 (1.2)
 Transferred6 (6.1)1 (7.7)5 (5.9)

ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HFNC, high-flow nasal cannula; ICU, intensive care unit; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Data are presented as a number (percentage).

All patients received antibiotic therapy, and most (99.0%) received antiviral therapy (lopinavir/ritonavir). Hydroxychloroquine was used in 79 (80.6%) patients. Glucocorticoid therapy was used in 18 patients (18.4%); this therapy was used more frequently in patients who required ICU care (76.9% vs. 9.4%, p<0.001). According to a study involving 1099 patients in 552 hospitals,3 18.6% received systemic glucocorticoids, and 44.5% of patients with severe COVID-19 received systemic glucocorticoids. In our study, 18.4% of all patients received systemic glucocorticoids, and 76.9% of patients in the ICU received systemic glucocorticoids. Because “severity” was not clearly defined in the Chinese study, it is difficult to compare findings. However, the high rate of use of glucocorticoids in our study can be explained by the fact that 84% of our ICU patients received invasive mechanical ventilation versus just 35.7% of the severe COVID-19 patients in the Chinese study. Wu, et al.13 reported that treatment with methylprednisolone decreased the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20–0.72) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who developed ARDS. The use of glucocorticoids for COVID-19 is beneficial in certain groups of patients, although further investigation is needed to identify the subgroups that can benefit the most. As of March 29, 30 patients (30.6%) had been discharged, and 5 (5.1%) had died. Six patients (one ICU and five general ward patients) were transferred to other tertiary care hospitals because our medical resources were exhausted. All of the other patients are still in the hospital. Because our hospital is a tertiary care university hospital, with many patients requiring intensive care, the fatality rate is likely higher than the overall mortality rate in Korea. However, the fatality rate in our study was much lower than rates reported in three single-center studies of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China.1212 Since there will be additional deaths among patients who remain in the hospital, the final fatality rate is expected to increase. Table 3 shows the laboratory findings of the patients on admission to hospital. In the complete blood counts, lymphopenia (40.8%) was the most common finding, followed by anemia (24.5%), neutrophilia (20.4%), and thrombocytopenia (13.3%). In blood chemistry analyses, increased lactate dehydrogenase (50.5%) was common.
Table 3

Laboratory Findings of Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Admission to Hospital

All patients (n=98)ICU (n=13)Non-ICU (n=85)p value
Complete blood count
 White blood cell count, ×109/L6.5±3.48.9±3.36.1±3.20.005
  Increased9 (9.2)4 (30.8)5 (5.9)0.003
  Decreased18 (18.4)0 (0)18 (21.2)
 Neutrophil count, ×109/L4.6±3.47.7±3.34.1±3.2<0.001
  Increased20 (20.4)9 (69.2)11 (12.9)<0.001
 Lymphocyte count, ×109/L1.4±0.70.8±0.31.5±0.7<0.001
  Decreased40 (40.8)11 (84.6)29 (34.1)0.001
 Hemoglobin, g/dL13.0±1.613.5±1.713.0±1.60.253
  Decreased24 (24.5)3 (23.1)21 (24.7)1.000
Platelets, ×109/L237.3±104.9186.7±64.9245.0±107.90.061
  Increased4 (4.1)0 (0)4 (4.7)0.188
  Decreased13 (13.3)3 (23.1)10 (11.8)
Blood chemistry
 Albumin, g/dL3.7±0.53.0±0.33.9±0.5<0.001
  Decreased33 (34.4)12 (92.3)21 (25.3)<0.001
 Alanine aminotransferase, IU/L33.9±42.158.8±93.630.1±26.30.294
  Increased19 (19.4)3 (23.1)16 (18.8)0.712
 Aspartate aminotransferase, IU/L45.9±47.2100.3±97.037.5±26.60.038
  Increased42 (42.9)11 (84.6)31 (36.5)0.001
 Total bilirubin, mg/dL0.9±0.41.1±0.60.8±0.40.071
  Increased16 (16.3)4 (30.8)12 (14.1)0.218
 Blood urea nitrogen, mg/dL15.3±9.520.0±11.414.6±9.00.057
  Increased12 (12.2)4 (30.8)8 (9.4)0.051
 Creatinine, mg/dL0.9±0.51.0±0.30.8±0.50.467
  Increased29 (29.6)6 (46.2)23 (27.1)0.196
 Creatinine phosphokinase, IU/L105.4±153.9131.9±122.0100.7±159.10.504
  Increased11 (12.6)2 (15.4)9 (12.2)0.667
 Lactate dehydrogenase, IU/L648.0±350.71272.6±542.1555.5±184.0<0.001
  Increased47 (50.5)12 (100)35 (43.2)<0.001
Infection biomarkers
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL6.0±8.417.7±9.54.2±6.7<0.001
  Increased61 (67.8)12 (100)49 (62.8)0.008
 Procalcitonin, ng/mL0.5±2.82.7±7.00.2±1.30.248
  Increased6 (6.2)4 (33.3)2 (2.4)0.002

ICU, intensive care unit; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Data are presented as a mean±SD or number (percentage).

Among infection-related biomarkers, C-reactive protein was elevated in 61 (67.8%) patients, while procalcitonin was increased only in 6 (6.2%). Fig. 1 shows the concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the SARS-CoV-2-infected patients [n=40 (ICU, n=10)]. Levels of all proinflammatory cytokines were significantly higher in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients in our study. Previous studies have demonstrated that increases in proinflammatory cytokine levels are associated with more severe disease in Middle East respiratory syndrome and severe acute respiratory syndrome patients. In patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome in South Korea, IL-6 and CXCL-10 levels were significantly higher in the severe disease group than in the mild group.14 In severe acute respiratory syndrome patients, the levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, and IFN-γ were elevated.15 To prevent organ damage from cytokine release syndrome, it is imperative to develop a drug that targets these cytokines.
Fig. 1

Concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in the plasma of SARS-CoV-2 patients. Plasma levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α in SARS-CoV-2-infected non-ICU (n=30) and ICU (n=10) patients. Data are presented as a mean±standard error of the mean. *p<0.001 vs. non-ICU (one-way ANOVA). IL, interleukin; ICU, intensive care unit; IFN, interferon; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

The severity of respiratory illness and results of arterial blood gas analyses of 13 ICU patients on the day of ICU admission were also measured. The mean interval from hospital admission to ICU admission was 1.2±1.5 days. On the day of ICU admission, the mean APACHE II score was 19.6±7.1, and the mean SOFA score was 7.4±3.2. The mean pH, lactate level, mean partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, and mean partial pressure of carbon dioxide were 7.4±0.1, 1.7±0.8 mmol/L, 174.5±44.9, and 39.8±9.5, respectively. A limitation of this study was that it was conducted at a single medical center and included a small number of patients. However, this study identified many predictors of the likely requirement for ICU care. We also found that proinflammatory cytokine levels were higher in patients with severe disease. A second limitation was the fact that this study did not include the patients' final clinical outcomes. Further analysis will be needed when the COVID-19 pandemic ends and final outcome data are available. This is the first study to describe the clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 in South Korea. In this single-center descriptive study of 98 patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 in Daegu, South Korea, 13.3% of the patients received ICU care. As of March 29, 2020, the mortality rate was 5.1%.
  15 in total

1.  Accuracy and reliability of APACHE II scoring in two intensive care units Problems and pitfalls in the use of APACHE II and suggestions for improvement.

Authors:  K H Polderman; A R Girbes; L G Thijs; R J Strack van Schijndel
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death.

Authors:  Gary B Smith; David R Prytherch; Paul Meredith; Paul E Schmidt; Peter I Featherstone
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaomin Wu; Xiaoyan Chen; Yanping Cai; Jia'an Xia; Xing Zhou; Sha Xu; Hanping Huang; Li Zhang; Xia Zhou; Chunling Du; Yuye Zhang; Juan Song; Sijiao Wang; Yencheng Chao; Zeyong Yang; Jie Xu; Xin Zhou; Dechang Chen; Weining Xiong; Lei Xu; Feng Zhou; Jinjun Jiang; Chunxue Bai; Junhua Zheng; Yuanlin Song
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Plasma inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  C K Wong; C W K Lam; A K L Wu; W K Ip; N L S Lee; I H S Chan; L C W Lit; D S C Hui; M H M Chan; S S C Chung; J J Y Sung
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Report on the Epidemiological Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in the Republic of Korea from January 19 to March 2, 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  58 in total

1.  The Comparison of Sarcopenia Diagnostic Criteria using AWGS 2019 with the Other Five Criteria in West China.

Authors:  Xiaolei Liu; Lisha Hou; Wanyu Zhao; Xin Xia; Fengjuan Hu; Gongchang Zhang; Qiukui Hao; Lixing Zhou; Yixin Liu; Meiling Ge; Yan Zhang; Jirong Yue; Birong Dong
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.140

2.  Mental and neurological disorders and risk of COVID-19 susceptibility, illness severity and mortality: A systematic review, meta-analysis and call for action.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Shu-Yu Ni; Wei Yan; Qing-Dong Lu; Yi-Miao Zhao; Ying-Ying Xu; Huan Mei; Le Shi; Kai Yuan; Ying Han; Jia-Hui Deng; Yan-Kun Sun; Shi-Qiu Meng; Zheng-Dong Jiang; Na Zeng; Jian-Yu Que; Yong-Bo Zheng; Bei-Ni Yang; Yi-Miao Gong; Arun V Ravindran; Thomas Kosten; Yun Kwok Wing; Xiang-Dong Tang; Jun-Liang Yuan; Ping Wu; Jie Shi; Yan-Ping Bao; Lin Lu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-09-08

3.  Specific cytokines in the inflammatory cytokine storm of patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome and extrapulmonary multiple-organ dysfunction.

Authors:  Jiajia Wang; Xinjing Yang; Yongsheng Li; Jian-An Huang; Junhong Jiang; Nan Su
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.099

4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of regional risk factors for critical outcomes of COVID-19 during early phase of the pandemic.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Kim; Hyeontaek Hwang; Hyunsook Hong; Jae-Joon Yim; Jinwoo Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Rheumatological complications of Covid 19.

Authors:  Hannah Zacharias; Shirish Dubey; Gouri Koduri; David D'Cruz
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 9.754

6.  Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome?

Authors:  Stephan Katzenschlager; Alexandra J Zimmer; Claudius Gottschalk; Jürgen Grafeneder; Stephani Schmitz; Sara Kraker; Marlene Ganslmeier; Amelie Muth; Alexander Seitel; Lena Maier-Hein; Andrea Benedetti; Jan Larmann; Markus A Weigand; Sean McGrath; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Comparison of the cardiovascular presentations, complications and outcomes following different coronaviruses' infection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammad Mostafa Ansari Ramandi; Hossein Yarmohammadi; Somayeh Beikmohammadi; Behzad Hassan Hosseiny Fahimi; Farbod Hatami; Hossein Beydokhti; Hooman Bakhshandeh; Nasim Naderi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2021-04-24

8.  Outcomes for Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shelief Y Robbins-Juarez; Long Qian; Kristen L King; Jacob S Stevens; S Ali Husain; Jai Radhakrishnan; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-06-25

9.  Prognostic Factors for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Daegu, Korea.

Authors:  Jong Geol Jang; Jian Hur; Eun Young Choi; Kyung Soo Hong; Wonhwa Lee; June Hong Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 - a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome?

Authors:  Stephan Katzenschlager; Alexandra J Zimmer; Claudius Gottschalk; Juergen Grafeneder; Alexander Seitel; Lena Maier-Hein; Andrea Benedetti; Jan Larmann; Markus A Weigand; Sean McGrath; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.