Literature DB >> 32390242

Variability in retinoblastoma genome stability is driven by age and not heritability.

Ashley Polski1,2, Liya Xu1,3, Rishvanth K Prabakar4, Xiaowu Gai5, Jonathan W Kim1,2, Rachana Shah6, Rima Jubran6, Peter Kuhn3,7,8,9, David Cobrinik1,2,7,10,11, James Hicks3,7, Jesse L Berry1,2.   

Abstract

Retinoblastoma (RB) is a childhood intraocular cancer initiated by biallelic inactivation of the RB tumor suppressor gene (RB1-/- ). RB can be hereditary (germline RB1 pathogenic allele is present) or non-hereditary. Somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) contribute to subsequent tumorigenesis. Previous studies of only enucleated RB eyes have reported associations between heritability status and the prevalence of SCNAs. Herein, we use an aqueous humor (AH) liquid biopsy to investigate RB genomic profiles in the context of germline RB1 status, age, and International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC) clinical grouping for both enucleated and salvaged eyes. Between 2014 and 2019, AH was sampled from a total of 54 eyes of 50 patients. Germline RB1 status was determined from clinical blood testing, and cell-free DNA from AH was analyzed for SCNAs. Of the 50 patients, 23 (46.0%; 27 eyes) had hereditary RB, and 27 (54.0%, 27 eyes) had non-hereditary RB. Median age at diagnosis was comparable between hereditary (13 ± 10 months) and non-hereditary (13 ± 8 months) eyes (P = 0.818). There was no significant difference in the prevalence or number of SCNAs based on (1) hereditary status (P > 0.56) or (2) IIRC grouping (P > 0.47). There was, however, a significant correlation between patient age at diagnosis, and (1) number of total SCNAs (r[52] = 0.672, P < 0.00001) and (2) number of highly-recurrent RB SCNAs (r[52] = 0.616, P < 0.00001). This evidence does not support the theory that specific molecular or genomic subtypes exist between hereditary and non-hereditary RB; rather, the prevalence of genomic alterations in RB eyes is strongly related to patient age at diagnosis.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aqueous humor; hereditary; liquid biopsy; retinoblastoma; somatic copy number alterations

Year:  2020        PMID: 32390242      PMCID: PMC7441809          DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  27 in total

1.  Profiling safety of intravitreal injections for retinoblastoma using an anti-reflux procedure and sterilisation of the needle track.

Authors:  Francis L Munier; Sameh Soliman; Alexandre P Moulin; Marie-Claire Gaillard; Aubin Balmer; Maja Beck-Popovic
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Raksha Rao; Santosh G Honavar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Age at diagnosis of isolated unilateral retinoblastoma does not distinguish patients with and without a constitutional RB1 gene mutation but is influenced by a parent-of-origin effect.

Authors:  A Schüler; S Weber; M Neuhäuser; C Jurklies; T Lehnert; H Heimann; G Rudolph; K-H Jöckel; N Bornfeld; D R Lohmann
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Lack of correlation between age at diagnosis and RB1 mutations for unilateral retinoblastoma: the importance of genetic testing.

Authors:  Jesse L Berry; Laura Lewis; Emily Zolfaghari; Sarah Green; Bao Han A Le; Thomas C Lee; A Linn Murphree; Jonathan W Kim; Rima Jubran
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.803

5.  Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells.

Authors:  Timour Baslan; Jude Kendall; Linda Rodgers; Hilary Cox; Mike Riggs; Asya Stepansky; Jennifer Troge; Kandasamy Ravi; Diane Esposito; B Lakshmi; Michael Wigler; Nicholas Navin; James Hicks
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Detection of mosaic RB1 mutations in families with retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Diane Rushlow; Beata Piovesan; Katherine Zhang; Nadia L Prigoda-Lee; Mellone N Marchong; Robin D Clark; Brenda L Gallie
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected intraocular tumors. The 1992 Urwick Lecture.

Authors:  J A Shields; C L Shields; H Ehya; R C Eagle; P De Potter
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Comparative genomic hybridisation divides retinoblastomas into a high and a low level chromosomal instability group.

Authors:  J E van der Wal; M A J A Hermsen; H J P Gille; N Y N Schouten-Van Meeteren; A C Moll; S M Imhof; G A Meijer; J P A Baak; P van der Valk
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  High resolution SNP array profiling identifies variability in retinoblastoma genome stability.

Authors:  Berber M Mol; Maarten P G Massink; Annemarie H van der Hout; Charlotte J Dommering; Johannes M A Zaman; Machteld I Bosscha; Wijnanda A Kors; Hanne E Meijers-Heijboer; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Hein te Riele; Annette C Moll; Jacqueline Cloos; Josephine C Dorsman
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Loss of photoreceptorness and gain of genomic alterations in retinoblastoma reveal tumor progression.

Authors:  Irsan E Kooi; Berber M Mol; Annette C Moll; Paul van der Valk; Marcus C de Jong; Pim de Graaf; Saskia E van Mil; Antoinette Y N Schouten-van Meeteren; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Gertjan L Kaspers; Hein Te Riele; Jacqueline Cloos; Josephine C Dorsman
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 8.143

View more
  6 in total

1.  An immature, dedifferentiated, and lineage-deconstrained cone precursor origin of N-Myc-initiated retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Hardeep P Singh; Dominic W H Shayler; G Esteban Fernandez; Matthew E Thornton; Cheryl Mae Craft; Brendan H Grubbs; David Cobrinik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Recurrent Somatic Chromosomal Abnormalities in Relapsed Extraocular Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Rosario Aschero; Jasmine H Francis; Daiana Ganiewich; Soledad Gomez-Gonzalez; Claudia Sampor; Santiago Zugbi; Daniela Ottaviani; Lauriane Lemelle; Marcela Mena; Ursula Winter; Genoveva Correa Llano; Gabriela Lamas; Fabiana Lubieniecki; Irene Szijan; Jaume Mora; Osvaldo Podhajcer; François Doz; François Radvanyi; David H Abramson; Andrea S Llera; Paula S Schaiquevich; Cinzia Lavarino; Guillermo L Chantada
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Genome maintenance in retinoblastoma: Implications for therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Chunsik Lee; Jong Kyong Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.111

4.  Comprehensive Somatic Copy Number Analysis Using Aqueous Humor Liquid Biopsy for Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Mary E Kim; Ashley Polski; Liya Xu; Rishvanth K Prabakar; Chen-Ching Peng; Mark W Reid; Rachana Shah; Peter Kuhn; David Cobrinik; James Hicks; Jesse L Berry
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Clinical, Genomic, and Pharmacological Study of MYCN-Amplified RB1 Wild-Type Metastatic Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Santiago Zugbi; Daiana Ganiewich; Arpita Bhattacharyya; Rosario Aschero; Daniela Ottaviani; Claudia Sampor; Eduardo G Cafferata; Marcela Mena; Mariana Sgroi; Ursula Winter; Gabriela Lamas; Mariona Suñol; Manuel Daroqui; Edgardo Baialardo; Beatriz Salas; Anirban Das; Adriana Fandiño; Jasmine H Francis; Fabiana Lubieniecki; Cinzia Lavarino; Ralph Garippa; Osvaldo L Podhajcer; David H Abramson; François Radvanyi; Guillermo Chantada; Andrea S Llera; Paula Schaiquevich
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  The Impact of Cell-Free DNA Analysis on the Management of Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Amy Gerrish; Helen Jenkinson; Trevor Cole
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.