Literature DB >> 32389918

Comprehensive analysis of DNA adducts (DNA adductome analysis) in the liver of rats treated with 1,4-dioxane.

Yukari Totsuka1, Yuya Maesako1,2, Hanako Ono3, Momoko Nagai3, Mamoru Kato3, Min Gi4, Hideki Wanibuchi4, Shoji Fukushima5,6, Kazuhiro Shiizaki2, Hitoshi Nakagama7.   

Abstract

1,4-Dioxane is a genotoxic carcinogen, and its mutagenic properties were recently observed in the liver of guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (gpt) delta transgenic rats. However, the mechanisms of its genotoxicity remain unclear. We analyzed DNA adduct formation in rat livers following 1,4-dioxane treatment. After administering 1,4-dioxane in drinking water at doses of 0, 20, 200, and 5,000 ppm, liver adduct formation was analyzed by DNA adductome analysis. Adducts in treated rat livers were dose-dependently increased compared with those in the control group. Principal component analysis-discriminant analysis (PCA-DA) clearly revealed two clusters of DNA adducts, associated with 0 ppm and low-dose (20 ppm) 1,4-dioxane-treatment versus middle- and high-dose (200, 5,000 ppm)-treated rats. After confirming the intensity of each adduct, three adducts were screened as characteristic of 1,4-dioxane treatment. Two of the three candidates contained thymine or cytidine/uracil moieties. Another candidate was identified as 8-oxo-dG based on mass fragmentation together with high-resolution accurate-mass (HRAM) mass spectrometry data. Oxidative stress responses may partly explain the mechanisms of increased mutations in the liver of gpt delta rats following 1,4-dioxane treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1,4-dioxane; DNA adduct; gpt delta rat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32389918      PMCID: PMC7248212          DOI: 10.2183/pjab.96.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci        ISSN: 0386-2208            Impact factor:   3.493


  20 in total

1.  DNA Adductome Analysis Identifies N-Nitrosopiperidine Involved in the Etiology of Esophageal Cancer in Cixian, China.

Authors:  Yukari Totsuka; Yingsong Lin; Yutong He; Kousuke Ishino; Haruna Sato; Mamoru Kato; Momoko Nagai; Asmaa Elzawahry; Yasushi Totoki; Hiromi Nakamura; Fumie Hosoda; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Tomonari Matsuda; Yoshitaka Matsushima; Guohui Song; Fanshu Meng; Dongfang Li; Junfeng Liu; Youlin Qiao; Wenqiang Wei; Manami Inoue; Shogo Kikuchi; Hitoshi Nakagama; Baoen Shan
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  AID, APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B efficiently deaminate deoxycytidines neighboring DNA damage induced by oxidation or alkylation.

Authors:  Cody P Diamond; Junbum Im; Erynn A Button; David N G Huebert; Justin J King; Faeze Borzooee; Hala S Abdouni; Lisa Bacque; Erin McCarthy; Heather Fifield; Lesley M Berghuis; Mani Larijani
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.770

3.  In vivo positive mutagenicity of 1,4-dioxane and quantitative analysis of its mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in rats.

Authors:  Min Gi; Masaki Fujioka; Anna Kakehashi; Takahiro Okuno; Kenichi Masumura; Takehiko Nohmi; Michiharu Matsumoto; Masako Omori; Hideki Wanibuchi; Shoji Fukushima
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Chromosome breakage is primarily responsible for the micronuclei induced by 1,4-dioxane in the bone marrow and liver of young CD-1 mice.

Authors:  S K Roy; A K Thilagar; D A Eastmond
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-09-05       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Carcinogenicity studies of 1,4-dioxane administered in drinking-water to rats and mice for 2 years.

Authors:  Hirokazu Kano; Yumi Umeda; Tatsuya Kasai; Toshiaki Sasaki; Michiharu Matsumoto; Kazunori Yamazaki; Kasuke Nagano; Heihachiro Arito; Shoji Fukushima
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 6.023

6.  1,4-Dioxane is not mutagenic in five in vitro assays and mouse peripheral blood micronucleus assay, but is in mouse liver micronucleus assay.

Authors:  T Morita; M Hayashi
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Re-evaluation of some organic chemicals, hydrazine and hydrogen peroxide.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  1999

8.  Lack of a dose-response relationship for carcinogenicity in the rat liver with low doses of 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline or N-nitrosodiethylamine.

Authors:  Shoji Fukushima; Hideki Wanibuchi; Keiichirou Morimura; Min Wei; Dai Nakae; Yoichi Konishi; Hiroyuki Tsuda; Nobuaki Uehara; Katsumi Imaida; Tomoyuki Shirai; Masae Tatematsu; Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Masao Hirose; Fumio Furukawa; Keiji Wakabayashi; Yukari Totsuka
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2002-10

Review 9.  A tutorial in small molecule identification via electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: The practical art of structural elucidation.

Authors:  Thomas De Vijlder; Dirk Valkenborg; Filip Lemière; Edwin P Romijn; Kris Laukens; Filip Cuyckens
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 10.946

Review 10.  What causes human cancer? Approaches from the chemistry of DNA damage.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kasai
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2016-07-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Oxidative stress and genotoxicity in 1,4-dioxane liver toxicity as evidenced in a mouse model of glutathione deficiency.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Yewei Wang; Georgia Charkoftaki; David J Orlicky; Emily Davidson; Fengjie Wan; Gary Ginsberg; David C Thompson; Vasilis Vasiliou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  New horizons of DNA adductome for exploring environmental causes of cancer.

Authors:  Yukari Totsuka; Masatoshi Watanabe; Yingsong Lin
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.518

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.