Literature DB >> 32389887

Serum Levels of α-Fetoprotein Increased More Than 10 Years Before Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

David M Hughes1, Sarah Berhane1, C A Emily de Groot2, Hidenori Toyoda3, Toshifumi Tada3, Takashi Kumada4, Shinji Satomura5, Naoshi Nishida6, Masatoshi Kudo6, Toru Kimura7, Yukio Osaki8, Ruwanthi Kolamunage-Dona1, Ruben Amoros9, Tom Bird10, Marta Garcίa-Fiñana1, Philip Johnson11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ultrasound (US)-based screening has been recommended for patients with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). US analysis, however, is limited in patients who are obese or have small tumors. The addition of serum level of α-fetoprotein (AFP) measurements to US analysis can increase detection of HCC. We analyzed data from patients with chronic liver disease, collected over 15 years in an HCC surveillance program, to develop a model to assess risk of HCC.
METHODS: We collected data from 3450 patients with chronic liver disease undergoing US surveillance in Japan from March 1998 through April 2014, and followed them up for a median of 8.83 years. We performed longitudinal discriminant analysis of serial AFP measurements (median number of observations/patient, 56; approximately every 3 months) to develop a model to determine the risk of HCC. We validated the model using data from 2 cohorts of patients with chronic liver disease in Japan (404 and 2754 patients) and 1 cohort in Scotland (1596 patients).
RESULTS: HCC was detected in 413 patients (median tumor diameter, 1.8 cm), during a median follow-up time of 6.60 years. In the development data set, the model identified patients who developed HCC with an area under the curve of 0.78; it correctly identified 74.3% of patients who did develop HCC, and 72.9% of patients who did not. Overall, 73.1% of patients were classified correctly. The model could be used to assign patients to a high-risk group (27.5 HCCs/1000 patient-years) vs a low-risk group (4.9 HCCs/1000 patient-years). A similar performance was observed when the model was used to assess patients with cirrhosis. Analysis of the validation cohorts produced similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a model to identify patients with chronic liver disease who are at risk for HCC based on change in serum AFP level over time. The model could be used to assign patients to high-risk vs low-risk groups, and might be used to select patients for surveillance.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Liver Cancer; Prognostic Factor; Stratification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32389887      PMCID: PMC7611145          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  19 in total

Review 1.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic liver disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Devan Kansagara; Joel Papak; Amirala S Pasha; Maya O'Neil; Michele Freeman; Rose Relevo; Ana Quiñones; Makalapua Motu'apuaka; Janice H Jou
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A Bayesian screening approach for hepatocellular carcinoma using multiple longitudinal biomarkers.

Authors:  Nabihah Tayob; Francesco Stingo; Kim-Anh Do; Anna S F Lok; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A new laboratory-based algorithm to predict development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Fasiha Kanwal; Jessica A Davila; Jennifer Kramer; Peter Richardson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using a prospectively developed and validated model based on serological biomarkers.

Authors:  Philip J Johnson; Sarah J Pirrie; Trevor F Cox; Sarah Berhane; Mabel Teng; Daniel Palmer; Janet Morse; Diana Hull; Gillian Patman; Chiaki Kagebayashi; Syed Hussain; Janine Graham; Helen Reeves; Shinji Satomura
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  GALAD Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection in Comparison with Liver Ultrasound and Proposal of GALADUS Score.

Authors:  Ju Dong Yang; Benyam D Addissie; Kristin C Mara; William S Harmsen; Jianliang Dai; Ning Zhang; Nicha Wongjarupong; Hawa M Ali; Hamdi A Ali; Fatima A Hassan; Sravanthi Lavu; Jessica L Cvinar; Nasra H Giama; Catherine D Moser; Katsuyuki Miyabe; Loretta K Allotey; Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; J Paul Theobald; Melissa M Ward; Mindie H Nguyen; Alex S Befeler; K Rajender Reddy; Myron Schwartz; Denise M Harnois; Hiroyuki Yamada; Sudhir Srivastava; Jo Ann Rinaudo; Gregory J Gores; Ziding Feng; Jorge A Marrero; Lewis R Roberts
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.090

7.  Alpha-Fetoprotein Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Leads to a Standardized Analysis of Dynamic AFP to Improve Screening Based Detection.

Authors:  Thomas G Bird; Polyxeni Dimitropoulou; Rebecca M Turner; Sara J Jenks; Pearce Cusack; Shiying Hey; Andrew Blunsum; Sarah Kelly; Catharine Sturgeon; Peter C Hayes; Sheila M Bird
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of disease stage and aetiology on survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for surveillance.

Authors:  Philip Johnson; Sarah Berhane; Chiaki Kagebayashi; Shinji Satomura; Mabel Teng; Richard Fox; Winnie Yeo; Frankie Mo; Paul Lai; Stephen L Chan; Toshifumi Tada; Hidenori Toyoda; Takashi Kumada
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  A comparison of group prediction approaches in longitudinal discriminant analysis.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.207

10.  Dynamic longitudinal discriminant analysis using multiple longitudinal markers of different types.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Arnošt Komárek; Gabriela Czanner; Marta Garcia-Fiñana
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.021

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Philip Johnson; Qing Zhou; Doan Y Dao; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 73.082

2.  The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy.

Authors:  Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana; David M Hughes
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.829

3.  Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated by systemic therapy: a systematic review and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Li Li; Xiaomi Li; Wendong Li; Jinglong Chen; Wei Li; Xiaoyan Ding; Yongchao Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk.

Authors:  Naoto Kubota; Naoto Fujiwara; Yujin Hoshida
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Tools for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance.

Authors:  Nia Adeniji; Renumathy Dhanasekaran
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2021-09-17

6.  The Combination of AFP and "Up-To-Seven" Criteria May Be a Better Strategy for Liver Transplantation in Chinese Cirrhotic HCC Patients.

Authors:  Da-Li Zhang; Dan-Ni Feng; Xi He; Xiao-Feng Zhang; Li-Xin Li; Zhi-Jie Li; Xiao-Feng Niu; Yun-Long Zhuang; Zhen-Wen Liu; Xu-Dong Gao; Hong-Bo Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  A blood-based prognostic liver secretome signature and long-term hepatocellular carcinoma risk in advanced liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Naoto Fujiwara; Masahiro Kobayashi; Austin J Fobar; Ayaka Hoshida; Cesia A Marquez; Bhuvaneswari Koneru; Gayatri Panda; Masataka Taguri; Tongqi Qian; Indu Raman; Quan-Zhen Li; Hiroki Hoshida; Hitomi Sezaki; Hiromitsu Kumada; Ryosuke Tateishi; Takeshi Yokoo; Adam C Yopp; Raymond T Chung; Bryan C Fuchs; Thomas F Baumert; Jorge A Marrero; Neehar D Parikh; Shijia Zhu; Amit G Singal; Yujin Hoshida
Journal:  Med (N Y)       Date:  2021-04-21

8.  Long-term prognosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment.

Authors:  Naoshi Nishida
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2020-09-21

9.  Knockdown of MUC16 (CA125) Enhances the Migration and Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Yao Huang; Xiaoyu Huang; Jianxing Zeng; Jun Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.