Literature DB >> 32389838

Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on chronic drug-resistant pain patients treated using brain stimulation approaches.

Angela Brocalero-Camacho1, Yolanda A Pérez-Borrego1, Vanesa Soto-León1, María Jesús Rodriguez-Matas2, Guglielmo Foffani3, Antonio Oliviero4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Lockdown; Motor cortex; Pain; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32389838      PMCID: PMC7206438          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


× No keyword cloud information.
Chronic pain often shows insufficient response to pharmacological treatments. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) of the motor cortex has been proposed as an alternative therapeutic approach [1,2]. This therapeutic intervention requires repeated NIBS sessions once-daily for 1 or 2 weeks followed by a maintenance protocol [2], [3], [4]. In our hospital, we usually apply ten NIBS daily sessions (two weeks, Monday to Friday); we will refer to this period as induction phase. After the induction phase, responsive subjects enter into the maintenance phase. Maintenance phase consists of one NIBS session every two weeks (for some patients this interval is shortened to 7–10 days). We used both repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In our lab, pain relief is similarly obtained with the two techniques. Currently, approx. 90% of our patients are receiving tDCS. A very small number of patients receiving tDCS are treated at home. In these cases, the caregiver is trained to apply the tDCS and we follow the patients remotely. Mid of March 2020, 74 patients were included in the maintenance phase of tDCS treatment at the Hospital and 7 patients were in the same phase but at home. Due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, we were not allowed to receive the patients at the Hospital to minimize the risk of contagion. Here, we present and analyse the effects of one-month lockdown on these patients and the estimated cost of starting again in the next future. We telephonically interviewed both the patients that habitually received tDCS at the Hospital (so that were forced to discontinue the treatment) and the patients that were receiving tDCS at home before the lockdown (they did not discontinue the treatment). During the phone interview, we asked to quantify the pain they have on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, so we have the possibility to compare it with the pain rating of the last tDCS session they received (we use to collect this info at every hospital visit or at home NIBS session). We observed pain worsening of patients that discontinued the treatment (N = 74; female = 49; mean age 52.3 ± 12.0; NRS: last evaluation before lockdown 5.0 ± 2.4 and after 6.7 ± 1.7, paired t-test, p < 0.0001), but not of patients that did not (N = 7; female = 4; mean age 42.3 ± 13.5; NRS: before lockdown 5.6 ± 2.6 and after 5.6 ± 2.4, paired t-test, p = 0.992). These data suggest that the subjects who discontinued the maintenance sessions are loosing the pain relief effects, probably with effects on their quality of life. Moreover, these effects do not depend on the lockdown per se since the other group is maintaining the analgesic effects. Probably, most of the patients that discontinued the treatment will require a new induction phase. As reported before, the induction period consists of 10 sessions, so estimating that approx. 90% of patients will require a new induction, when we will be allowed to restart we will have to programme about 650 tDCS sessions, which are approx. 520 more than the planned sessions (the planned sessions were 2 per month). This will cost approx. €52.000 (considering €100 per tDCS session). Approximately 80% of patients we attend live at less than 50 Km from the Hospital so they use to travel from their homes to the Hospital even during the induction periods (average cost of each journey estimated €20 for a total of about €8000), but a 20% of our patients during the induction periods are hospitalized. Thus, we have to add the hospitalization cost of at least ten patients for ten days that is approx. €60000 (our daily rate is €600). For tDCS treatment, the total added cost due to the COVID-19 lockdown in our Hospital will be of approx. €120000 (costs assumed by the national health system and insurances plus the costs assumed by the patients). This means that one month lockdown increases our annual cost for NIBS treatment about 50%, considering that in one year, 74 patients usually received an average of 25 maintenance sessions for a total of 1850 sessions and €222000 cumulative costs (NIBS sessions: €185000 and travel expenses: €37000). In conclusion, the COVID-19 lockdown, at least in our Hospital, has a clear negative clinical impact on chronic drug-resistant pain patients treated with NIBS, and implies a substantial extra cost for public health system, insurances and patients.

Declaration of competing interest

AO and GF co-founded Neurek SL and GF co-founded Newronika Srl.
  4 in total

Review 1.  The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to relieve pain.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Andrea Antal; Rechdi Ahdab; Daniel Ciampi de Andrade; Felipe Fregni; Eman M Khedr; Michael Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 2.  Pain.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Andrea Antal; Samar S Ayache; David H Benninger; Jérôme Brunelin; Filippo Cogiamanian; Maria Cotelli; Dirk De Ridder; Roberta Ferrucci; Berthold Langguth; Paola Marangolo; Veit Mylius; Michael A Nitsche; Frank Padberg; Ulrich Palm; Emmanuel Poulet; Alberto Priori; Simone Rossi; Martin Schecklmann; Sven Vanneste; Ulf Ziemann; Luis Garcia-Larrea; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018).

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; André Aleman; Chris Baeken; David H Benninger; Jérôme Brunelin; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Saša R Filipović; Christian Grefkes; Alkomiet Hasan; Friedhelm C Hummel; Satu K Jääskeläinen; Berthold Langguth; Letizia Leocani; Alain Londero; Raffaele Nardone; Jean-Paul Nguyen; Thomas Nyffeler; Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Antonio Oliviero; Frank Padberg; Ulrich Palm; Walter Paulus; Emmanuel Poulet; Angelo Quartarone; Fady Rachid; Irena Rektorová; Simone Rossi; Hanna Sahlsten; Martin Schecklmann; David Szekely; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.708

  4 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Methods and strategies of tDCS for the treatment of pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Aurore Thibaut; Beatriz Costa; Isadora Ferreira; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on chronic pain in Spain: a scoping review.

Authors:  María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña; Alberto González-Villar; Yolanda Triñanes
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-02-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.