Literature DB >> 32389563

Urgent development of an anaesthesiology-based intensive care unit for critical COVID-19 infected patients.

Hakim Harkouk1, Chantal Jacob2, Dominique Fletcher3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32389563      PMCID: PMC7196536          DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med        ISSN: 2352-5568            Impact factor:   4.132


× No keyword cloud information.
The global COVID-19 pandemic requires anaesthesiologists to adapt themselves to this unprecedented situation [1]. Beyond this first adaptation, the major influx of patients imposes to rapidly manage critical patients outside the usual intensive care structures, in addition to required care of surgical patients. In France, the first cases are diagnosed on January 24th, 2020. On March 14th, all unessential institutions are shut down. Since March 17th at noon, the population is confined at home with strict rules. On April 1st, 6,017 patients are hospitalised in intensive care units while national maximal admissions are estimated to be 5,000 patients. We shortly describe the use of professional skills and existing structures in a French anaesthesia department to deal with this COVID-19 crisis. French anaesthesiologists have 5 years of training with mixed skills in anaesthesia (3 years) and resuscitation (2 years). Our 390 beds University Hospital is part of the Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, the first hospitals group in Ile-de-France, a region that is severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our structures include 10 operating theatres and 14 beds of recovery room (RR), performing an average of 10,000 scheduled or urgent surgical interventions a year in trauma, visceral and vascular surgeries. The medical team includes 14 anaesthesia consultants and 8 residents; the paramedic team includes 25 nurse anaesthetists and 13 RR nurses. The intensive care unit (ICU), managed by intensivists, has a capacity of 12 resuscitation beds and 14 continuous care beds. A regulatory team headed by an anaesthesiologist with the help of surgeons, usually meeting once a week, decides a new organisation evaluating rapidly both management of critical negative and positive COVID-19 patients and surgical activity; chronological details are listed in Table 1 . Surgeons were committed to find all alternative solutions to transfer scheduled surgeries outside our hospital (dermatological and visceral cancer surgery, semi-urgent vascular). Anaesthesiologists lead with surgeons the development of these new organisations. On March 26th, the RR and 6 operating theatres nearby were organised to create with the anaesthesia and operating theatre staff (anaesthesiologists, nurse anaesthetists as nurses, operating theatre nurses as nursing assistants) an ICU receiving patients ventilated with anaesthesia [Perseus© (Drägger)] and resuscitation (Mindray© S300) ventilators.
Table 1

Chronological details on management of critical negative and positive COVID-19 patients and surgical activity.

DateSituation in anaesthesiaOperating theatreIntensive care unit (ICU)Comments
24/01/2020Fourteen beds in recovery room (RR)Twelve operating theatresTwelve resuscitation beds and 14 continuous care bedsTwo independent operating theatres separated with respectively 6 (vascular, visceral, plastic, and ophthalmologic) and 4 operating theatres (orthopedic, dermatological). Endoscopic activity on two rooms on a separated level
17/03/2020Fourteen beds in recovery roomReduction of surgical activity on 4 operating theatres (emergency and oncological surgery)Eighteen resuscitation beds and 8 continuous care bedsTransfer to the ICU of 3 anesthesiologists, 4 RR nurses and 6 ventilators; partial transfer of nurse anesthetist in the RR
20/03/2020Management of COVID-19 negative patients in RR shifted in 10 continuous care bedsSurgery maintained in two isolated operating theatres combining negative and positive COVID-19 patients.Creation of a dedicated RR of two beds in a room previously used for regional anaesthesiaTwenty two resuscitation beds and 4 continuous care bedsEndoscopy activity was restricted to haemorrhagic emergencies and cancer diagnosis
22/03/2020Management of positive COVID-19 patients in RR shifted in 10 continuous care bedsSurgery maintained in the same organisationTwenty six resuscitation beds including 3 reserved for negative COVID-19 patients
24/03/2020Management of COVID-19 positive patients in RR and 6 operating theatres to 4 continuous care beds and 6 resuscitation beds (HFO and NIPPV)Surgery maintained in the same organisationSame organisation

COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019; HFO: High-flow oxygenation; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; NIPPV: Non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation; RR: Recovery room.

Chronological details on management of critical negative and positive COVID-19 patients and surgical activity. COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019; HFO: High-flow oxygenation; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; NIPPV: Non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation; RR: Recovery room. The manpower includes 40 anaesthetist nurses and RR nurses and 10 anaesthesiologists (2 anaesthesiologists present 24 hours a day). All these professionals work in 12-hour shifts, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. This radical reorganisation within 2 weeks of an operating theatre and a RR relies on the professional, structural and material resources of an anaesthesia department to create an ICU with 10 beds dedicated to critical COVID-19 infected patients while maintaining the management of selected scheduled and emergency surgery. Problems to overcome are numerous, covering both patient care, professional protection and urgency of management; here, we only discuss three of them: the isolation of COVID or non-COVID patients by restructuring the circulation areas, using the advantages of an operating theatre (clean and contaminated circuit, closed operating theatre under negative pressure) and identifying two separate care teams selected both on professional skills and risk of viral exposition (age over 60 years old and/or comorbidities). All successive decisions were validated with hospital hygiene team; making the best of existing structures for patient care and professional protection: the RR allows easy centralised monitoring of patients but exposes to aerosolised virus, especially with high oxygen flow and requires enhanced protection for nursing professionals (FFP2 mask changed every 8 hours, dressing and take-off procedures, gown) but also an adaptation of the RR [1], [2]. Negative pressure was installed on day 2 after admission of first critical patients and RR was equipped with 3 air extractors Plasmair© (Dalkia) which allow treating 7500 m3 of air per hour (i.e. 10 volumes per hour for a 750 m3 RR) [3]; the medical and paramedical anaesthesia teams had to upgrade rapidly their skills to be able to use high and very high oxygen flow therapy, ventilation of the patient with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome and to be kept informed of additional therapeutic solutions specific to these patients in collaboration with intensivists. The target physician/patient ratio was set to 1/5 (2 anaesthesiologist 24 hours a day) and 1/2 for nurses in the acute phase and 1/2.5 in the steady phase. After 10 days of functioning as ICU for critical COVID-19 infected patients, 20 patients were admitted with 7 patients with mechanical ventilation. Patients start to be discharged from ICU and hospital (respectively 12 and 3) and 1 patient is deceased. We report our experience with mobilisation of an anaesthesia team and use of existing structures for urgent creation of an ICU managing critical COVID-19 patients in a pandemic which exceeds the usual resources of resuscitation structures.

Funding statement

Support was provided solely from institutional and/or departmental sources.

Disclosure of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
  3 in total

1.  Supplemental treatment of air in airborne infection isolation rooms using high-throughput in-room air decontamination units.

Authors:  Vance Bergeron; Annie Chalfine; Benoît Misset; Vincent Moules; Nicolas Laudinet; Jean Carlet; Bruno Lina
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Trenton Bushmaker; Dylan H Morris; Myndi G Holbrook; Amandine Gamble; Brandi N Williamson; Azaibi Tamin; Jennifer L Harcourt; Natalie J Thornburg; Susan I Gerber; James O Lloyd-Smith; Emmie de Wit; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  COVID-19 Infection: Implications for Perioperative and Critical Care Physicians.

Authors:  John R Greenland; Marilyn D Michelow; Linlin Wang; Martin J London
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.892

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Qualitative analysis of the organisational response of a university hospital during the first wave of the COVID-19 crisis.

Authors:  Hakim Harkouk; Patrick Castel; Lucile Hervouët; Dominique Fletcher
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-06

2.  The use of post-anaesthesia care units as a supply of ICU beds while maintaining scheduled surgery: A cross-sectional web-based feasibility survey in France.

Authors:  Thomas Clavier; Vincent Bruckert; Paul Abraham; Mathieu Capdevila; Arthur James
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 9.375

3.  Collaboration Structures in COVID-19 Critical Care: Retrospective Network Analysis Study.

Authors:  Chao Yan; Xinmeng Zhang; Cheng Gao; Erin Wilfong; Jonathan Casey; Daniel France; Yang Gong; Mayur Patel; Bradley Malin; You Chen
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-03-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.