Literature DB >> 32389061

Dose and setting of rehabilitation received after stroke in Queensland, Australia: a prospective cohort study.

Rohan S Grimley1,2,3, Ingrid Cm Rosbergen3,4,5, Louise Gustafsson5,6, Eleanor Horton7, Theresa Green8,9, Greg Cadigan3, Suzanne Kuys10, Nadine E Andrew2,11, Dominique A Cadilhac2,12.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe patterns and dose of rehabilitation received following stroke and to investigate their relationship with outcomes.
DESIGN: This was a prospective observational cohort study.
SETTING: A total of seven public hospitals and all subsequent rehabilitation services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study.
SUBJECTS: Participants were consecutive patients surviving acute stroke between July 2016 and January 2017.
METHODS: We tracked rehabilitation for six months following stroke and obtained 90- to 180-day outcomes from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. MEASURES: Dose of rehabilitation - time in therapy by physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology; modified Rankin Scale (mRS)- premorbid, acute care discharge and 90- to 180-day follow-up.
RESULTS: We recruited 504 patients, of whom 337 (median age = 73 years, 41% female) received 643 episodes of rehabilitation in 83 different services. Initial rehabilitation was predominantly inpatient (260/337, 77%) versus community-based (77/337, 21%). Therapy time was greater within inpatient services (median = 29 hours) compared to community-based (6 hours) or transition care (16 hours). Median (Quartile 1, Quartile 3) six-month cumulative therapy time was 73 hours (40, 130) when rehabilitation commenced in stroke units and continued in inpatient rehabilitation units; 43 hours (23, 78) when commenced in inpatient rehabilitation units; and 5 hours (2, 9) with only community rehabilitation. In 317 of 504 (63%) with follow-up data, improvement in mRS was most likely with inpatient rehabilitation (OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.7-7.7), lower with community rehabilitation (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.7-3.8) compared to no rehabilitation, after adjustment for baseline factors.
CONCLUSION: Amount of therapy varied widely between rehabilitation pathways. Amount of therapy and chance of improvement in function were highest with inpatient rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebrovascular disease/stroke; health services research; outcomes; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32389061     DOI: 10.1177/0269215520916899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  2 in total

1.  A register-based study comparing planned rehabilitation following acute stroke in 2011 and 2017.

Authors:  Malin C Nylén; Hanna C Persson; Tamar Abzhandadze; Katharina S Sunnerhagen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Quantifying the amount of physical rehabilitation received by individuals living with neurological conditions in the community: a scoping review.

Authors:  Tyler M Saumur; Sarah Gregor; Yijun Xiong; Janelle Unger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.