Zehao Jin1, Ye Chen2, Xiaochun Weng1, Anwu Huang1, Shuang Lin1, Haiying Li1,3. 1. Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China. 3. Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether proinflammatory cytokines have an effect on myocardial cells (MCs) and hepatocytes during myocardial ischemia to induce cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein H (CREBH) cleavage, activate the acute phase response in the liver, and cause a superimposed injury in MCs. METHODS: In this study, a hepatocyte-MC transwell co-culture system was used to investigate the relationship between myocardial hypoxia/reperfusion injury and CREBH cleavage. MCs and hepatocytes of neonatal rats were obtained from the ventricles and livers of Sprague-Dawley rats, respectively. MCs were inoculated into the lower chamber of transwell chambers for 12 hours under hypoxia. Levels of the endoplasmic reticulum stress protein glucose-regulated protein 78 in MCs, CREBH in hepatocytes, inflammatory factor (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6) levels, and cell viability were evaluated. The effect of CREBH knockdown was also studied using a CREBH-specific short hairpin RNA (Ad-CREBHi). RESULTS: We found that proinflammatory cytokines affect MCs and hepatocytes during myocardial ischemia to induce CREBH cleavage, activate the acute phase response in the liver, and cause superimposed injury in MCs. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of CREBH aggravates myocardial injury during myocardial ischemia.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether proinflammatory cytokines have an effect on myocardial cells (MCs) and hepatocytes during myocardial ischemia to induce cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein H (CREBH) cleavage, activate the acute phase response in the liver, and cause a superimposed injury in MCs. METHODS: In this study, a hepatocyte-MC transwell co-culture system was used to investigate the relationship between myocardial hypoxia/reperfusion injury and CREBH cleavage. MCs and hepatocytes of neonatal rats were obtained from the ventricles and livers of Sprague-Dawley rats, respectively. MCs were inoculated into the lower chamber of transwell chambers for 12 hours under hypoxia. Levels of the endoplasmic reticulum stress protein glucose-regulated protein 78 in MCs, CREBH in hepatocytes, inflammatory factor (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6) levels, and cell viability were evaluated. The effect of CREBH knockdown was also studied using a CREBH-specific short hairpin RNA (Ad-CREBHi). RESULTS: We found that proinflammatory cytokines affect MCs and hepatocytes during myocardial ischemia to induce CREBH cleavage, activate the acute phase response in the liver, and cause superimposed injury in MCs. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of CREBH aggravates myocardial injury during myocardial ischemia.
Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a pathological phenomenon of
myocardial injury caused by recovery of blood flow after an episode of myocardial infarction.[1] Myocardial I/Rinjury increases myocardial structural injury, leading to
myocardial cell (MC) death, and has a negative effect on the patient’s prognosis.
Myocardial I/R injury mainly involves calcium overload, abundance of oxygen
radicals, and occurrence of vascular endothelial dysfunction, constituting the
so-called classic myocardial I/R injury.[2] The systemic inflammatory response is an important mechanism of myocardial
I/R injury and levels of inflammatory factors, are significantly increased in
patients with myocardial infarction.[3] Moreover, these inflammatory factors not only indicate an inflammatory
response, but also directly play a role in myocardial injury.[4] In contrast, some cytotoxic anti-inflammatory drugs, such as
cyclophosphamide, can reduce systemic and local myocardial inflammatory responses.[5] additionally, the endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-mediated acute phase
response (APR) can induce inflammatory responses and aggravate myocardial injury.[6] However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence regarding whether
myocardial local inflammation is involved in development of the APR.ERS is induced by oxidative stress, calcium overload, nutrient deprivation, viral
infection, and hypoxia.[7,8]
Classical ERS is caused by unfolded or misfolded protein accumulation, which is
induced by the above-mentioned factors.[8] The unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling cascade is activated by the
three main UPR sensors of protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase,
inositol-requiring enzyme 1α, and activating transcription factor (ATF) 6.[9,10] However, recent evidence has
indicated that cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein H (CREBH) contains a
transcription factor and belongs to the CREB/ATF family, which mediates the
intrahepatic APR in vivo.[6]C-reactive protein (CRP) is a part of the nonspecific APR protein that regulates
expression of APR genes.[11] CREBH cleavage is induced by lipopolysaccharide and proinflammatory cytokines
during APR activation and CRP expression in the liver. High serum CRP levels are
important for assessing the risk of myocardial infarction and may play a role in
promoting atherosclerosis during APR. Furthermore, in severe acute coronary syndrome
(ACS), accumulation of inflammatory cells is observed because of formation and
progression of intracoronary plaques until their rupture.[12,13] Therefore, the APR in patients
with ACS is significantly related to ischemic myocardial injury.CREBH is highly expressed in the liver. I/R injury due to CREBH cleavage in the liver
might induce ERS-mediated inflammation in MCs, leading to activation of a systemic
stress reaction and release of proinflammatory cytokines. Additionally, CREBH
cleavage might activate expression of APR genes, induce a systemic inflammatory
response, and eventually aggravate myocardial injury. Recent studies have shown that
ERS-mediated APR can induce inflammatory responses, and their coupling may lead to
development of myocardial injury. The main aim of our study was to determine whether
proinflammatory cytokines have an effect on MCs and hepatocytes during myocardial
ischemia to induce CREBH cleavage, activate the APR in the liver, and cause
superimposed injury in MCs. A hepatocyte–MC transwell co-culture system for
determining whether CREBH has a proinflammatory effect in co-culture was used in our
investigation to test the assumptions made above.
Materials and methods
Isolation and primary culture of MCs and hepatocytes from neonatal
rats
One-day-old neonatal Sprague–Dawley rats were provided by the Zhejiang Laboratory
Animal Center. Routine methods were used to culture the MCs at a concentration
of 1 × 106 cells/mL in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 µM 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine.
After 36 hours of incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2, the medium was
changed to DMEM without 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine, and incubation of the cells
continued under the same conditions. The culture medium was changed every 3 days.[14]Liver cells from neonatal Sprague–Dawley rats were isolated via cold trypsin
digestion of a tissue sample combined with multi-step, low-speed centrifugation.
Thereafter, cells were cultured on a plate in HepatoZYME-SFM (Hangzhou,
Zhejiang, China) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 9.6 mg/mL prednisolone, 0.16
U/mL insulin, 0.014 mg/mL glucagon, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 U/mL
streptomycin at 37°C in an incubator containing 5% CO2.[15] Cell yield and viability were measured with trypan blue exclusion. The
medium was changed every 24 hours. Every procedure was approved by the Animal
Care and Use Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical
University.
Hypoxia/reperfusion of MCs
To simulate the hypoxia/reperfusion (H/R) process, 5-day cultured MCs were
transferred into an anaerobic chamber and cultured at 37°C for 2 hours. Hypoxia
was then stopped, and the cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal
bovine serum at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 2 hours.[16] ERS-positive control cultures were set up using tunicamycin (Tm, 5
μg/mL).MCs were treated with H/R (2 hours each) and the importance of ERS in myocardial
injury was examined by investigating the effect of Tm. ERS protein levels
(antibodies: glucose-regulated protein [GRP] 78, 11587-1-AP; Proteintech,
Chicago, IL, USA and CREBH, ab111938; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), inflammatory
factor levels (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], ab46070; Abcam and interleukin-6
[IL-6], ab222503; Abcam), and cell viability were assessed.
Recombinant adenovirus and transfection
For endogenous knockdown of CREBH expression in MC cells, we applied a
recombinant adenovirus system. Adenovirus for the unspecific (Ad-USi)
control and CREBH RNAi (Ad-CREBHi) were obtained from Shanghai Jima
Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Recombinant
adenoviruses were amplified in MCs and were purified with the Adeno-X Virus
Maxi Purification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The virus titer was
determined using the Adeno-X Rapid Titer kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA,
USA). Forty-eight hours after infection with AD-USi or Ad-CREBHi, total RNA
was isolated using Tri Reagent (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions.
Transwell co-culture
In the co-culture system, the cells were in medium without any contact. A 24-well
permeable support (Corning, New York, NY, USA; well size: 0.4 µm; Figure 1) was used. The
following six cell groups were established in the experiment: Three of these
groups included MCs without hepatocytes as follows: (1) MCs were cultured in the
lower chamber and medium alone was placed in the upper chamber (MCs group); (2)
MCs alone were cultured in the lower compartment and were subjected to H/R
(MCs + H/R group); and (3) MCs alone were cultured in the lower compartment with
Tm (5 μg/mL) (MCs + Tm group). The other three groups included MCs plus
co-culture with hepatocytes as follows: (1) MCs were cultured in the lower
compartment and hepatocytes were cultured in the upper compartment (L/M group);
(2) MCs were seeded in the lower compartment and subjected to hypoxia in an
anaerobic chamber for 12 hours, and normal liver cells were added to the upper
compartment followed by reoxygenation for 12 hours (L/M + H/R group); and (3)
MCs were cultured in the lower chamber with Tm (5 μg/mL) for 12 hours (L/M + Tm
group). Thereafter, the medium was changed to DMEM without Tm in the L/M + Tm
group, and normal hepatocytes were added to the upper chamber and re-oxygenated
for 12 hours to simulate H/R.
Figure 1.
Illustration of the co-culture system.
Illustration of the co-culture system.
Assessment of MC proliferation
The beating frequencies of cultured MCs were determined after treatment. The Cell
Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; C0037; Beyotime) was used to evaluate proliferation of
MCs as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The CCK-8 test, which is a
colorimetric assay, is indirectly used as a cell viability indicator via
measurement of cell metabolic activity.[17] After treatment, the upper chamber was removed, and 50 µL of CCK-8
solution was added to each well of the lower chamber. After incubation at 37°C
for 1 hour, the absorbance (optical density [OD]) for each well was measured at
450 nm on a microplate reader. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The
viability of cells was calculated using the following formula:
Western blot analyses
After washing the cells twice with phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were
lysed and separated in cell lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100,
150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.5 μg/mL leupeptin, 1%
Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride). Protein
was then quantified using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay. The lysates were
incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Thereafter, they were centrifuged at
10,000 × g at 4°C for 5 minutes. An equivalent amount of
protein (20 μg) was added to a 10% gel using sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to a
polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. After blocking with Tris-buffered saline
containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 5% milk (TBST), each membrane was cultured with
their primary antibodies. Protein in MCs was incubated with primary antibodies
against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (dilution of 1:1000,
10494-1-AP; Proteintech) and GRP78 (dilution of 1:1000, 11587-1-AP;
Proteintech). Protein in hepatocytes was incubated with primary antibodies
against GAPDH (dilution of 1:1000) and CREB (dilution of 1:1000; ab111938;
Abcam). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C. After washing with TBST
three times, the membranes were incubated for 1 hour with secondary antibodies
(dilution of 1:5000) at room temperature. Western Bright ECL (Nanjing
Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) was used to detect the corresponding
immunoreactive protein bands on the membranes using the Gluing Imaging System
(Shanghai Shanfu Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The bands
were analyzed using Image Lab 4.1 software (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA).
Detection of TNF-α and IL-6 levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay
TNF-α and IL-6 levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays
(Shanghai Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Blanks and
standard dilutions were added to the blank wells of the assay plate, and
different concentrations of standards (100 µL/well) were added to the other
corresponding wells. The reaction wells were sealed with sealing tape and
incubated at 36°C for 90 minutes. The biotinylated antibody working solution was
prepared 20 minutes in advance. The plates were washed five times. Biotinylated
antibody dilution solution was then added to the blank wells, and the remaining
wells biotinylated antibody working solution added (100 µL/well). The reaction
wells were sealed with fresh sealing tape and incubated at 36°C for 60 minutes.
The plates were washed again for five times. Enzyme conjugate dilution solution
was added to blank wells, and the remaining wells had enzyme conjugate working
solution added (100 µL/well). The reaction wells were sealed with fresh sealing
tape and incubated at 36°C for 30 minutes in the dark. The plates were washed
for five times. Chromogenic substrate (TMB) was added (100 µL/well) and the
plates were incubated in the dark at 36°C. Stop solution was finally added and
the OD450 value was measured (within 3 minutes) immediately after mixing.
Isolation of RNA and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
According to the manufacturer’s instructions, total RNA was isolated from
cultured MCs and hepatocytes using TRIzol reagent. To quantify gene
transcription, the Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to generate cDNA. Forward and reverse
primers of specific genes and the SYBR Green qPCR kit (Roche, Basel,
Switzerland) were used to detect cDNA on the 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The following cycling conditions were
adopted: 94°C for 1 minute, 35 cycles of denaturing for 30 seconds at 94°C,
annealing for 2 minutes at 60°C, and extension for 1 minute at 72°C. Expression
levels mRNA in different samples were normalized against GAPDH and analyzed
using 7500 system SDS software (Applied Biosystems). Relative mRNA levels were
evaluated using the 2–ΔΔCt method.[18] The primer sequences for GRP78 were as follows: forward primer,
ACTCCAGGTTAACTC and reverse primer, GCATCCTGCATCCTT.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Experimental data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All of the
experiments were repeated at least three times. Variance analysis was used for
statistical analysis and Scheffe’s test was used for multiple comparisons.
P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Results
Analyses of GRP78 and CREBH protein expression using western blotting
ERS-positive control cultures were established using Tm. GRP78 levels were
significantly higher in the MCs + H/R group and the MCs + Tm group (positive
control group) than in the MCs group (untreated control group) (both
P < 0.05, Figure 2a, b). Therefore, H/R appeared to
have induced ERS in MCs, and co-culture with hepatocytes enhanced expression
levels of GRP78 and CREBH (Figure 2c, d). This result indicated that CREBH cleavage in the
liver might induce ERS-mediated inflammation in MCs.
Figure 2.
GRP78 and CREBH protein expression using western blotting. a: Western
blotting results of GRP78 protein expression levels. b: Statistical
analyses of results shown panel “a”. c: Results of western blotting of
CREBH protein expression levels. d: Statistical analyses of results
shown in panel “c”. e: Results of western blotting analyses of knockdown
of CREBH protein levels in the hepatocytes using adenoviruses encoding
CREBH-specific shRNA (Ad-CREBHi). f: Statistical analyses of results
shown in panel “e”. Note: *P < 0.05 vs the MCs
group, #P < 0.05 vs the L/M + Tm group,
$P < 0.05, $$P < 0.01 vs
CREBH-N.
Tm: tunicamycin, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, MCS: myocardial cells, L/M:
lower compartment and hepatocytes, Ad-USi: adenovirus for the
unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNA.i
GRP78 and CREBH protein expression using western blotting. a: Western
blotting results of GRP78 protein expression levels. b: Statistical
analyses of results shown panel “a”. c: Results of western blotting of
CREBH protein expression levels. d: Statistical analyses of results
shown in panel “c”. e: Results of western blotting analyses of knockdown
of CREBH protein levels in the hepatocytes using adenoviruses encoding
CREBH-specific shRNA (Ad-CREBHi). f: Statistical analyses of results
shown in panel “e”. Note: *P < 0.05 vs the MCs
group, #P < 0.05 vs the L/M + Tm group,
$P < 0.05, $$P < 0.01 vs
CREBH-N.Tm: tunicamycin, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, MCS: myocardial cells, L/M:
lower compartment and hepatocytes, Ad-USi: adenovirus for the
unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNA.iThe CREBH gene was silenced using adenoviruses encoding CREBH-specific shRNA
(Ad-CREBHi) in H/R-induced ERS-mediated inflammation to study the effect of
knockdown of CREBH on hepatocytes. Another set of hepatocytes was also
transfected with an unspecific shRNA (Ad-USi) as a control. After co-culture
with H/R-treated MCs, western blotting showed that Ad-CREBHi treatment
significantly reduced CREBH protein levels in hepatocytes, as well GRP78 protein
levels in MCs (P < 0.05, Figure 2e, f).
Analyses of GRP78 and CREBH genes using reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction
Relative expression levels of GRP78 mRNA in the MCs + H/R and MCs + Tm groups
were significantly higher than those in the MCs group (all
P < 0.05). Furthermore, relative GRP78 mRNA expression
levels in the L/M + H/R group were significantly higher than those in the
MCs + H/R group (P < 0.05). However, there was no
significant difference in GRP78 mRNA levels between the L/M + H/R and L/M + TM
groups (Figure 3a, b).
CREBH mRNA expression levels in the L/M + H/R and L/M + Tm groups were
significantly higher than those in the MCs group (both
P < 0.05). Moreover, GRP78 and CREBH mRNA expression levels
were decreased using Ad-CREBHi, but not using Ad-USi (Figure 3c, d).
Figure 3.
Relative GRP78 and CREBH mRNA expression levels using RT-PCR. a: RT-PCR
results of GRP78 in the MCs + H/R, MCs + Tm, L/M + H/R, L/M + Tm, and
untreated control groups. b: Relative GPR78 mRNA expression levels in
the L/M, L/M + H/R, and L/M + Tm groups. c: RT-PCR results of GPR78,
CREBH-FL, and CREBH-N using Ad-CREBHi and Ad-USi. d: Relative CREBH mRNA
expression levels CREBH-FL and CREBH-N with Ad-CREBHi and Ad-USi. Note
*P < 0.05 vs the control group.
Tm: tunicamycin, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, MCS: myocardial cells, L/M:
lower compartment and hepatocytes, Ad-USi: adenovirus for the
unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNAi.
Relative GRP78 and CREBH mRNA expression levels using RT-PCR. a: RT-PCR
results of GRP78 in the MCs + H/R, MCs + Tm, L/M + H/R, L/M + Tm, and
untreated control groups. b: Relative GPR78 mRNA expression levels in
the L/M, L/M + H/R, and L/M + Tm groups. c: RT-PCR results of GPR78,
CREBH-FL, and CREBH-N using Ad-CREBHi and Ad-USi. d: Relative CREBH mRNA
expression levels CREBH-FL and CREBH-N with Ad-CREBHi and Ad-USi. Note
*P < 0.05 vs the control group.Tm: tunicamycin, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, MCS: myocardial cells, L/M:
lower compartment and hepatocytes, Ad-USi: adenovirus for the
unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNAi.
Effect of MC–hepatocyte co-culture on the viability of MCs
The results of the CCK-8 test showed that after H/R treatment, the viability of
MCs in the MCs + H/R group was significantly lower than that in the MCs group
(P < 0.05). Further, the viability of MCs was even lower
in the L/M + H/R group than in the MCs + H/R group
(P < 0.05). Nevertheless, treatment with Ad-CREBHi improved
the viability of cells (Figure
4a, b).
Figure 4.
CCK-8 test of the viability of MCs. a: Viability of MCs in the MCs + H/R,
MCs + Tm, L/M + H/R, L/M + Tm, and untreated control groups. b:
Viability of MCs with Ad-CREBHi and Ad-USi. Note:
*P < 0.05 vs the control group.
Tm: tunicamycin, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, MCS: myocardial cells, L/M:
lower compartment and hepatocytes, Ad-USi: adenovirus for the
unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNAi.
CCK-8 test of the viability of MCs. a: Viability of MCs in the MCs + H/R,
MCs + Tm, L/M + H/R, L/M + Tm, and untreated control groups. b:
Viability of MCs with Ad-CREBHi and Ad-USi. Note:
*P < 0.05 vs the control group.Tm: tunicamycin, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, MCS: myocardial cells, L/M:
lower compartment and hepatocytes, Ad-USi: adenovirus for the
unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNAi.TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the MCs + H/R group were significantly higher than those
in the MCs group (both P < 0.05), which suggested that
inflammatory factor levels increased with an increase in the extent of
myocardial injury. As expected, secretion of TNF-α (Figure 5a) and IL-6 (Figure 5b) was significantly upregulated
by co-culture of hepatocytes and MCs in the L/M + H/R group compared with that
in the MCs + H/R group (all P < 0.05). Moreover,
administration of Ad-CREBHi normalized TNF-α and IL-6 levels.
Figure 5.
Detection of TNF-α and IL-6 levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay. a: Detection of IL-6 levels. b: Detection of TNF-α levels. Note
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs the
MCs group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01
vs Ad-CREBHi or Ad-USi.
MCs: myocardial cells, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, Ad-USi: adenovirus for
the unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNAi, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α,
IL-6: interleukin-6.
Detection of TNF-α and IL-6 levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay. a: Detection of IL-6 levels. b: Detection of TNF-α levels. Note
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs the
MCs group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01
vs Ad-CREBHi or Ad-USi.MCs: myocardial cells, H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, Ad-USi: adenovirus for
the unspecific, Ad-CREBHi: adenovirus for cyclic AMP-responsive
element-binding protein H (CREBH) RNAi, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α,
IL-6: interleukin-6.
Effect of H/R treatment in co-cultured hepatocytes
To determine whether increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines promote CREBH
expression, which may be required to activate the APR and cause ERS in
hepatocytes, we performed reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR) analysis of co-cultured hepatocytes that were challenged with H/R.
After 12 hours of H/R stimulation of MCs, mRNA expression levels of the
endoplasmic reticulum chaperones GRP78 and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) were
significantly higher in hepatocytes compared with the MCs group (controls) (all
P < 0.05) (Figure 6b). Furthermore, CRP and CREBH
mRNA levels were elevated in hepatocytes after H/R stimulation compared with
controls (all P < 0.05). This result was confirmed using
western blot analysis. We then studied single-cultured hepatocytes that were
stimulated by IL-6 (60 ng/mL) or TNF-α (20 ng/mL). RT-PCR and western blotting
results of GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH in hepatocytes are shown in Figure 6a, c, and d–f. In
single-cultured hepatocytes, there was a significant elevation in the level of
these four proteins compared with controls (all P < 0.05).
These data provide evidence that proinflammatory cytokines in MCs can cause an
UPR and APR activation in hepatocytes, as well as H/R-induced ERS.
Figure 6.
Effect of H/R treatment in co-cultured hepatocytes. a: Results of reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction for GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH
mRNA expression in hepatocytes stimulated by IL-6 (60 ng/mL) or TNF-α
(20 ng/mL). b: Results of reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction for GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH mRNA expression in hepatocytes
after 12 hours of H/R stimulation in MCs. c: Western blotting results of
GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH protein expression in hepatocytes. d: Fold
activity of GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH protein expression in
hepatocytes.
H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, CRP: C-reactive protein, CREBH: cyclic
AMP-responsive element-binding protein H, TNF-α: tumor necrosis
factor-α, CHOP: C/EBP homologous protein
Effect of H/R treatment in co-cultured hepatocytes. a: Results of reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction for GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH
mRNA expression in hepatocytes stimulated by IL-6 (60 ng/mL) or TNF-α
(20 ng/mL). b: Results of reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction for GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH mRNA expression in hepatocytes
after 12 hours of H/R stimulation in MCs. c: Western blotting results of
GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH protein expression in hepatocytes. d: Fold
activity of GRP78, CHOP, CRP, and CREBH protein expression in
hepatocytes.H/R: hypoxia/reperfusion, CRP: C-reactive protein, CREBH: cyclic
AMP-responsive element-binding protein H, TNF-α: tumor necrosis
factor-α, CHOP: C/EBP homologous protein
Discussion
Atherosclerosis is known as a chronic low-grade inflammatory disease.[19] Inflammation is generally believed to play a critical role in the
pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.[20,21] Inflammation is considered to
be the cause of proatherogenic changes in lipoprotein, including elevated
very-low-density lipoprotein and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.[22] In the process of infection and inflammation, metabolic changes are caused by
a complex systemic reaction called the APR. The APR leads to restoration of
homeostasis and changes in the concentrations of specific plasma proteins, including
CRP and serum P component of amyloid protein. We have previously studied the
mechanism of injury caused by ERS-mediated inflammation in MCs after H/R. We found a
role of nuclear factor-κB in the relationship between ERS and inflammation during
myocardial I/R.[23,24] The relationship between myocardial I/R injury and the systemic
inflammatory response was also shown by an elevation in plasma CRP and TNF-α levels
after myocardial I/R injury.[5] Recent research suggests that CRP levels are not only an important indicator
of the risk of myocardial infarction, but they also directly promote inflammation[25] related to myocardial I/R injury. This increases the myocardial infarct area
and it can be mitigated with use of immunosuppressants, such as cyclophosphamide,
methotrexate, and sulfasalazine. Moreover, inflammation is caused by different
proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6.[26] IL-6 levels are elevated in patients with ACS,[27] which might be attributable to secretion by the ischemic/reperfused myocardium.[28] Other cytokines may be released by monocytes.[29] Because of significantly increased serum levels of TNF-α or other cytokines,
hepatocytes can respond to release of inflammatory cytokines and regulate
transcription of the CRP gene, aggravating the systemic inflammatory response (Figure 5). Kaufman et al.
found that CREBH was activated by ERS and released an N-terminal fragment from
site-1 and site-2 proteinases. The N-terminal fragment can transfer to the nucleus
to upregulate CRP expression.[6] However, there is lack of evidence regarding a direct association between
liver-specific expression of CREBH and H/R-induced myocardial inflammation during
the APR.The hepatocyte-specific bZIP transcription factor CREBH can be cleaved by ERS,
providing important signals that are necessary for the APR.[30] In the absence of ERS, CREBH remains in an inactive state as a 75-kDa
full-length protein in the membrane fraction. CREBH is activated by the Golgi local
proteinases site-1 and site-2 proteinases to release a 50-kDa N-terminal fragment.
This fragment can migrate into the nucleus and induce transcription of APR genes,
such as CRP and serum P component of amyloid protein. This provides a connection
between ERS and the acute inflammatory response.[6,31,32] In our study, the role of
ERS-mediated inflammation in MCs was studied during H/R. Our findings suggested that
ERS contributed to myocardial I/R injury and increased the levels of various
proinflammatory cytokines. Our experiments on the effect of CREBH cleavage on
co-cultured MCs suggested that myocardial injury was more severe in co-culture of
MCs and hepatocytes compared with cultured MCs alone, as shown by lower cell
viability and higher proinflammatory cytokine levels. Proinflammatory cytokines
might have an effect on MCs and hepatocytes, resulting in an increase of injury in
MCs (Figure 4). Furthermore,
western blotting and RT-PCR analyses indicated that CREBH cleavage may attenuate
myocardial injury by activating the transcription of specific APR genes in
hepatocytes under ERS. In contrast, inhibition of CREBH decreased myocardial injury
and proinflammatory cytokine levels. These findings are consistent with previous
reports, which suggested that CREBH exerts a proinflammatory effect that induces
hepatocytes to increase proinflammatory cytokine levels in supernatant.[6,31,33] This further confirms the
importance of CREBH as a crucial link between ERS and the APR in
vivo.Although CREBH belongs to the CREB/ATF family, it plays a different role in ERS owing
to its different modes of stimulation, tissue distribution, and response
element-binding protein.[34] Therefore, CREBH cleavage cannot affect the typical UPR for expression of ER
chaperone genes, but it can induce the APR by regulating specifically expressed
genes in the liver.[35,36] Previous reports have suggested that promoting functional
recovery of the endoplasmic reticulum might exert therapeutic effects as follows.
Salubrinal, which is a phosphatase inhibitor, can protect cells from ERS-induced
apoptosis by selectively inhibiting the dephosphorylation of eukaryotic translation
initiation factor 2 subunit α, thus inhibiting protein synthesis and accumulation in
the endoplasmic reticulum.[37] Additionally, vaticanol B, which is a chemical chaperone of resveratrol
tetramer, inhibits the UPR and inflammatory response by stabilizing misfolded
proteins, facilitating protein folding, and reducing the protein folding
load.[38,39] However, the molecular mechanism underlying the role of CREBH
in modulation of APR genes requires further investigation. In summary, our study
suggests that CREBH exerts proinflammatory effects on the hepatocyte–MC transwell
co-culture system and results in aggravation of myocardial injury through the APR,
which is activated by cleavage of CREBH (Figures 2 and 3).There is increasing evidence that atherosclerosis is a systemic disease because serum
high-sensitive troponin T levels are increased in many patients with an APR.[28] This suggests that myocardial injury occurs via the APR because many proteins
that are synthesized during this process increase the risk of atherosclerosis.
Moreover, CREBH plays a major role in the relationship of myocardial I/R injury and
the APR (Figure 6). Rational
targeting may modulate the cleavage of CREBH or suppress the APR and reduce
myocardial I/R injury in patients with ACS.
Authors: Y Omori; J Imai ; M Watanabe; T Komatsu; Y Suzuki; K Kataoka; S Watanabe; A Tanigami; S Sugano Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2001-05-15 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Michael Boyce; Kevin F Bryant; Céline Jousse; Kai Long; Heather P Harding; Donalyn Scheuner; Randal J Kaufman; Dawei Ma; Donald M Coen; David Ron; Junying Yuan Journal: Science Date: 2005-02-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; Tim Crowe; William J Sasiela; John Tsai; John Orazem; Raymond D Magorien; Charles O'Shaughnessy; Peter Ganz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-01-06 Impact factor: 91.245