Qian Gao1, Huiyan Li2, Yuan Zou1, Bo Hou1, Lixiu Liu3. 1. Second Ward, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, China. 2. Department of Nursing, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, China. 3. Second Ward, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, China. lihuiyanlhyy@sina.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Patients with gastric cancer often experience postoperative problems such as dumping syndrome, abdominal cramps, and nausea, which have profound effects on their mental health and quality of life. Earlier studies have shown that comprehensive health education can dramatically improve the quality of life of cancer patients after surgery. Thus, in this study, we conducted a health education intervention program in patients who had undergone surgical treatment for gastric cancer and evaluated the effectiveness of this program in improving the postoperative quality of life, with an attempt to offer evidence for better postoperative management of gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Totally, 80 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at our center from February 2018 to February 2019 were equally divided into an observation group and control group according to the random number table method. The observation group was offered with interventions regarding health education, including disease awareness-raising, instructions on behavior and lifestyle, rehabilitation management, and mental health counseling, and the control group received the routine nursing intervention. The quality of life one month before and after surgery was assessed by using the Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-STO22. RESULTS: The baseline data and quality of life showed no significant differences between the observation group and the control group one month before surgery (both P>0.05). One month after the surgery, the scores of dysphagia, pain/discomfort, reflux symptoms, and emotional issues and overall score in the observation group decreased significantly (34.86±2.170, 38.66±3.08, 32.26±2.76, 49.55±4.20, and 54.26±7.03, respectively), which were also significantly lower than those in the control group (36.33±3.10, 44.29±3.72, 33.64±3.10, 53.56±3.25, and 60.17±7.28, respectively; all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive health education intervention program can effectively improve the quality of life in patients after gastric cancer surgery and deserves further application in clinical settings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients with gastric cancer often experience postoperative problems such as dumping syndrome, abdominal cramps, and nausea, which have profound effects on their mental health and quality of life. Earlier studies have shown that comprehensive health education can dramatically improve the quality of life of cancerpatients after surgery. Thus, in this study, we conducted a health education intervention program in patients who had undergone surgical treatment for gastric cancer and evaluated the effectiveness of this program in improving the postoperative quality of life, with an attempt to offer evidence for better postoperative management of gastric cancerpatients. METHODS: Totally, 80 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at our center from February 2018 to February 2019 were equally divided into an observation group and control group according to the random number table method. The observation group was offered with interventions regarding health education, including disease awareness-raising, instructions on behavior and lifestyle, rehabilitation management, and mental health counseling, and the control group received the routine nursing intervention. The quality of life one month before and after surgery was assessed by using the Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-STO22. RESULTS: The baseline data and quality of life showed no significant differences between the observation group and the control group one month before surgery (both P>0.05). One month after the surgery, the scores of dysphagia, pain/discomfort, reflux symptoms, and emotional issues and overall score in the observation group decreased significantly (34.86±2.170, 38.66±3.08, 32.26±2.76, 49.55±4.20, and 54.26±7.03, respectively), which were also significantly lower than those in the control group (36.33±3.10, 44.29±3.72, 33.64±3.10, 53.56±3.25, and 60.17±7.28, respectively; all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive health education intervention program can effectively improve the quality of life in patients after gastric cancer surgery and deserves further application in clinical settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gastric cancer; factors; health education; intervention