Taylor Fleming1, Alexandra B Collins2, Geoff Bardwell3, Al Fowler4, Jade Boyd3, Will Small2, Ryan McNeil5. 1. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, 270-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. 2. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. 3. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada. 4. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada. 5. British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 367 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 10001, United States; Program in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 367 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 10001, United States. Electronic address: ryan.mcneil@yale.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Housing is a critical determinant of HIV-related outcomes among people living with HIV (PLHIV) who use drugs, including on HIV treatment adherence. Research shows that sense of home may have important implications for mitigating harms associated with low-income housing environments among PLHIV who use drugs, but how this shapes treatment is poorly understood. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 PLHIV who use drugs recruited from an ongoing prospective cohort in Vancouver, Canada. Recruitment was targeted towards individuals living in single room occupancy housing who had previously reported low treatment adherence. Interviews were co-led with a peer research assistant, and focused on housing conditions, drug use patterns, and HIV management. Interviews were transcribed, analyzed thematically, and interpreted by drawing on concepts of home and place-making. RESULTS: The ability to exert control over housing environments contributed to participants' perceptions of home by fostering feelings of safety and allowing for creation of personalized space. Participants readily identified the importance of housing stability and quality in maintaining health (e.g. food storage, pest-free), including HIV care. However, informed by social-structural mechanisms that undermined agency, negative experiences of home adversely impacted treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that sense of home may enable ability to manage HIV care, and is promoted through feelings of security within, and control over, housing environments. Supports in navigating competitive housing markets are needed to address the role that home plays in HIV treatment adherence.
INTRODUCTION: Housing is a critical determinant of HIV-related outcomes among people living with HIV (PLHIV) who use drugs, including on HIV treatment adherence. Research shows that sense of home may have important implications for mitigating harms associated with low-income housing environments among PLHIV who use drugs, but how this shapes treatment is poorly understood. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 PLHIV who use drugs recruited from an ongoing prospective cohort in Vancouver, Canada. Recruitment was targeted towards individuals living in single room occupancy housing who had previously reported low treatment adherence. Interviews were co-led with a peer research assistant, and focused on housing conditions, drug use patterns, and HIV management. Interviews were transcribed, analyzed thematically, and interpreted by drawing on concepts of home and place-making. RESULTS: The ability to exert control over housing environments contributed to participants' perceptions of home by fostering feelings of safety and allowing for creation of personalized space. Participants readily identified the importance of housing stability and quality in maintaining health (e.g. food storage, pest-free), including HIV care. However, informed by social-structural mechanisms that undermined agency, negative experiences of home adversely impacted treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that sense of home may enable ability to manage HIV care, and is promoted through feelings of security within, and control over, housing environments. Supports in navigating competitive housing markets are needed to address the role that home plays in HIV treatment adherence.
Authors: M-J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; David R Bangsberg; Jane Buxton; Surita Parashar; Silvia Guillemi; Julio Montaner; Evan Wood Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Benjamin Maas; Nadia Fairbairn; Thomas Kerr; Kathy Li; Julio S G Montaner; Evan Wood Journal: Health Place Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Julie Bruneau; Mark Daniel; Michal Abrahamowicz; Geng Zang; François Lamothe; Jean Vincelette Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Angela A Aidala; Michael G Wilson; Virginia Shubert; David Gogolishvili; Jason Globerman; Sergio Rueda; Anne K Bozack; Maria Caban; Sean B Rourke Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrea Krüsi; Jill Chettiar; Amelia Ridgway; Janice Abbott; Steffanie A Strathdee; Kate Shannon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.308