Literature DB >> 32388122

Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and physical characterization of cilnidipine loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for oral delivery optimized using the principles of design of experiments.

Rimpy Diwan1, Punna Rao Ravi2, Nikita Shantaram Pathare1, Vidushi Aggarwal1.   

Abstract

Cilnidipine (CND), an anti-hypertensive drug, is known to have low oral bioavailability due to its poor aqueous solubility, low dissolution rate and high gut wall metabolism. In the present study, CND loaded compritol based nanoparticles (CND-CMP-NPs) were prepared by emulsification-solvent evaporation method applying the concepts of design of experiments. Critical factors affecting particle size and loading efficiency (LE%) were assessed by hybrid design approach, comprising of Mini Run Resolution IV design followed by Box-Behnken design. Particle size, PDI, zeta potential and LE% of optimized formulations of CND-CMP-NPs were 207.1 ± 2.9 nm, 0.27 ± 0.1, -22.2 ± 1.9 mV and 15.9 ± 1.3% respectively. No significant changes were observed in physical stability of NPs when stored at 25 °C/60% RH over a period of three months. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that Fabs of CND-CMP-NPs (0.66) was significantly higher than the free CND (0.27). The Cmax and AUC0-∞ of CND-CMP-NPs (572.4 ± 25.3 ng/mL and 5588.6 ± 229.5 ng/mL × h) were significantly higher (Pcal < 0.0001) as compared to free CND (363.6 ± 23.5 ng/mL and 2316.1 ± 163.6 ng/mL × h). MRT of CND-CMP-NPs (9.8 ± 0.9 h) was significantly higher (Pcal < 0.0001) as compared to free CND (5.7 ± 0.5 h). Pharmacodynamic studies showed a maximum of 38% decrease in systolic blood pressure with more than 20% drop in systolic blood pressure sustained for a total duration of 64 h in the case of CND-CMP-NPs as compared to free CND. CND-CMP-NPs not only provide higher and sustained plasma levels of CND but also higher and sustained antihypertensive therapy as compared to free CND.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cilnidipine; Mini Run Resolution IV design; PKPD modeling; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Solid lipid nanoparticles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32388122     DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces        ISSN: 0927-7765            Impact factor:   5.268


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nanocrystals for Improving Oral Bioavailability of Drugs: Intestinal Transport Mechanisms and Influencing Factors.

Authors:  Zonghua Tian; Yaping Mai; Tingting Meng; Shijie Ma; Guojing Gou; Jianhong Yang
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 2.  Current approaches in lipid-based nanocarriers for oral drug delivery.

Authors:  María Plaza-Oliver; Manuel Jesús Santander-Ortega; María Victoria Lozano
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 3.  Targeting the Gut Mucosal Immune System Using Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Jacob McCright; Ann Ramirez; Mayowa Amosu; Arnav Sinha; Amanda Bogseth; Katharina Maisel
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  Nano-hydroxyapatite improves intestinal absorption of acetazolamide (BCS Class IV drug)-but how?

Authors:  Kenichi Kaneko; Ryosuke Miyasaka; Roslyn Hayman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery: Pharmacological and Biopharmaceutical Aspects.

Authors:  Sebastián Scioli Montoto; Giuliana Muraca; María Esperanza Ruiz
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.