| Literature DB >> 32388110 |
Laura Scherer1, Jens-Christian Svenning2, Jing Huang3, Colleen L Seymour4, Brody Sandel5, Nathaniel Mueller6, Matti Kummu7, Mateete Bekunda8, Helge Bruelheide9, Zvi Hochman10, Stefan Siebert11, Oscar Rueda12, Peter M van Bodegom12.
Abstract
Various environmental challenges are rapidly threatening ecosystems and societies globally. Major interventions and a strategic approach are required to minimize harm and to avoid reaching catastrophic tipping points. Setting evidence-based priorities aids maximizing the impact of the limited resources available for environmental interventions. Focusing on protecting both food security and biodiversity, international experts prioritized major environmental challenges for intervention based on three comprehensive criteria - importance, neglect, and tractability. The top priorities differ between food security and biodiversity. For food security, the top priorities are pollinator loss, soil compaction, and nutrient depletion, and for biodiversity conservation, ocean acidification and land and sea use (especially habitat degradation) are the main concerns. While climate change might be the most pressing environmental challenge and mitigation is clearly off-track, other issues rank higher because of climate change's high attention in research. Research and policy agendas do not yet consistently cover these priorities. Thus, a shift in attention towards the high-priority environmental challenges, identified here, is needed to increase the effectiveness of global environmental protection.Keywords: Agriculture; Ecosystems; Effectiveness; Environmental protection; Global change; Prioritization
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32388110 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963