Melissa S Zhou1, Madeeha Nasir2, Luis C Farhat3, Minjee Kook2, Bekir B Artukoglu2, Michael H Bloch2. 1. Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: melissa.zhou@yale.edu. 2. Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB) in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). METHOD: We searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials that examined the efficacy of pharmacological agents in the treatment of ASD and measured RRB as an outcome. Our primary outcome was the standardized mean difference in rating scales of RRB. RESULTS: We identified 64 randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 3,499 participants with ASD. Antipsychotics significantly improved RRB outcomes compared to placebo (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.28, 95% CIs = 0.08-0.49), z = 2.77, p = .01) demonstrating a small effect size. Larger significant positive effects on RRB in ASD were seen in individual studies with fluvoxamine, buspirone, bumetanide, divalproex, guanfacine, and folinic acid that have not been replicated. Other frequently studied pharmacological treatments in ASD including oxytocin, omega-3 fatty acids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), and methylphenidate did not demonstrate significant benefit in reducing RRB compared to placebo (oxytocin: SMD = 0.23, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.47, z = 1.85, p = .06; omega-3 fatty acids: SMD = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.05 to 0.43, z = 1.54, p = .12; SSRI: SMD = 0.09, 95% CI = -0.21 to 0.39, z = 0.60, p = .56; methylphenidate: SMD = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.11 to 0.46, z = 1.23, p = .22). CONCLUSION: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that currently available pharmacological agents have at best only a modest benefit for the treatment of RRB in ASD, with the most evidence supporting antipsychotic medications. Additional randomized controlled trials with standardized study designs and consistent and specific assessment tools for RRB are needed to further understand how we can best help ameliorate these behaviors in individuals with ASD.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of pharmacological treatments for restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRB) in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). METHOD: We searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials that examined the efficacy of pharmacological agents in the treatment of ASD and measured RRB as an outcome. Our primary outcome was the standardized mean difference in rating scales of RRB. RESULTS: We identified 64 randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 3,499 participants with ASD. Antipsychotics significantly improved RRB outcomes compared to placebo (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.28, 95% CIs = 0.08-0.49), z = 2.77, p = .01) demonstrating a small effect size. Larger significant positive effects on RRB in ASD were seen in individual studies with fluvoxamine, buspirone, bumetanide, divalproex, guanfacine, and folinic acid that have not been replicated. Other frequently studied pharmacological treatments in ASD including oxytocin, omega-3 fatty acids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), and methylphenidate did not demonstrate significant benefit in reducing RRB compared to placebo (oxytocin: SMD = 0.23, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.47, z = 1.85, p = .06; omega-3 fatty acids: SMD = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.05 to 0.43, z = 1.54, p = .12; SSRI: SMD = 0.09, 95% CI = -0.21 to 0.39, z = 0.60, p = .56; methylphenidate: SMD = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.11 to 0.46, z = 1.23, p = .22). CONCLUSION: The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that currently available pharmacological agents have at best only a modest benefit for the treatment of RRB in ASD, with the most evidence supporting antipsychotic medications. Additional randomized controlled trials with standardized study designs and consistent and specific assessment tools for RRB are needed to further understand how we can best help ameliorate these behaviors in individuals with ASD.
Authors: Onella Athnaiel; Greeshma A Job; Roberto Ocampo; Pamela Teneqexhi; William S Messer; Michael E Ragozzino Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Spyridon Siafis; Oğulcan Çıray; Hui Wu; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Irene Bighelli; Marc Krause; Alessandro Rodolico; Anna Ceraso; Giacomo Deste; Maximilian Huhn; David Fraguas; Antonia San José Cáceres; Dimitris Mavridis; Tony Charman; Declan G Murphy; Mara Parellada; Celso Arango; Stefan Leucht Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 7.509
Authors: Adrián Rafael Murillo-de-Ozores; María Chávez-Canales; Paola de Los Heros; Gerardo Gamba; María Castañeda-Bueno Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 4.566