N J Onufrak1, N M Smith2, M J Satlin3, J B Bulitta4, X Tan5, P N Holden2, R L Nation6, J Li7, A Forrest8, B T Tsuji2, Z P Bulman9. 1. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Inc., Schenectady, NY, USA. Electronic address: nikolas.onufrak@gmail.com. 2. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Drug Delivery Disposition & Dynamics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 7. Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 8. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 9. Department of Pharmacy Practice, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: bulman@uic.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Optimal combination therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is unknown. The present study sought to characterize the pharmacodynamics (PD) of polymyxin B (PMB), meropenem (MEM) and rifampin (RIF) alone and in combination using a hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) coupled with mechanism-based modelling (MBM). METHODS: A 10-day HFIM was utilized to simulate human pharmacokinetics (PK) of various PMB, MEM and RIF dosing regimens against a clinical KPC-Kp isolate, with total and resistant subpopulations quantified to capture PD response. A MBM was developed to characterize bacterial subpopulations and synergy between agents. Simulations using the MBM and published population PK models were employed to forecast the bacterial time course and the extent of its variability in infected patients for three-drug regimens. RESULTS: In the HFIM, a PMB single-dose ('burst') regimen of 5.53 mg/kg combined with MEM 8 g using a 3-hr prolonged infusion every 8 hr and RIF 600 mg every 24 hr resulted in bacterial counts below the quantitative limit within 24 hr and remained undetectable throughout the 10-day experiment. The final MBM consisted of two bacterial subpopulations of differing PMB and MEM joint susceptibility and the ability to form a non-replicating, tolerant subpopulation. Synergistic interactions between PMB, MEM and RIF were well quantified, with the MBM providing adequate capture of the observed data. DISCUSSION: An in vitro-in silico approach answers questions related to PD optimization as well as overall feasibility of combination therapy against KPC-Kp, offering crucial insights in the absence of clinical trials.
OBJECTIVES: Optimal combination therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is unknown. The present study sought to characterize the pharmacodynamics (PD) of polymyxin B (PMB), meropenem (MEM) and rifampin (RIF) alone and in combination using a hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) coupled with mechanism-based modelling (MBM). METHODS: A 10-day HFIM was utilized to simulate human pharmacokinetics (PK) of various PMB, MEM and RIF dosing regimens against a clinical KPC-Kp isolate, with total and resistant subpopulations quantified to capture PD response. A MBM was developed to characterize bacterial subpopulations and synergy between agents. Simulations using the MBM and published population PK models were employed to forecast the bacterial time course and the extent of its variability in infectedpatients for three-drug regimens. RESULTS: In the HFIM, a PMB single-dose ('burst') regimen of 5.53 mg/kg combined with MEM 8 g using a 3-hr prolonged infusion every 8 hr and RIF 600 mg every 24 hr resulted in bacterial counts below the quantitative limit within 24 hr and remained undetectable throughout the 10-day experiment. The final MBM consisted of two bacterial subpopulations of differing PMB and MEM joint susceptibility and the ability to form a non-replicating, tolerant subpopulation. Synergistic interactions between PMB, MEM and RIF were well quantified, with the MBM providing adequate capture of the observed data. DISCUSSION: An in vitro-in silico approach answers questions related to PD optimization as well as overall feasibility of combination therapy against KPC-Kp, offering crucial insights in the absence of clinical trials.
Authors: Justin R Lenhard; Jürgen B Bulitta; Terry D Connell; Natalie King-Lyons; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Soon-Ee Cheah; Visanu Thamlikitkul; Beom Soo Shin; Gauri Rao; Patricia N Holden; Thomas J Walsh; Alan Forrest; Roger L Nation; Jian Li; Brian T Tsuji Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Jürgen B Bulitta; Neang S Ly; Jenny C Yang; Alan Forrest; William J Jusko; Brian T Tsuji Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-10-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jorge A Ramos-Castañeda; Alberto Ruano-Ravina; Raquel Barbosa-Lorenzo; Jaime E Paillier-Gonzalez; Javier C Saldaña-Campos; Diego F Salinas; Elkin V Lemos-Luengas Journal: J Infect Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Brian T Tsuji; Jason M Pogue; Alexandre P Zavascki; Mical Paul; George L Daikos; Alan Forrest; Daniele R Giacobbe; Claudio Viscoli; Helen Giamarellou; Ilias Karaiskos; Donald Kaye; Johan W Mouton; Vincent H Tam; Visanu Thamlikitkul; Richard G Wunderink; Jian Li; Roger L Nation; Keith S Kaye Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Elin M Svensson; Robin J Svensson; Lindsey H M Te Brake; Martin J Boeree; Norbert Heinrich; Sarah Konsten; Gavin Churchyard; Rodney Dawson; Andreas H Diacon; Gibson S Kibiki; Lilian T Minja; Nyanda E Ntingiya; Ian Sanne; Stephen H Gillespie; Michael Hoelscher; Patrick P J Phillips; Ulrika S H Simonsson; Rob Aarnoutse Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Nicholas M Smith; Katie Rose Boissonneault; Liang Chen; Vidmantas Petraitis; Ruta Petraitiene; Xun Tao; Jieqiang Zhou; Yinzhi Lang; Povilas Kavaliauskas; Zackery P Bulman; Patricia N Holden; Raymond Cha; Jürgen B Bulitta; Barry N Kreiswirth; Thomas J Walsh; Brian T Tsuji Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: G L Drusano; Michael N Neely; Sarah Kim; Walter M Yamada; Stephan Schmidt; Brandon Duncanson; Jocelyn Nole; Nino Mtchedlidze; Charles A Peloquin; Arnold Louie Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Hajira Bilal; Jessica R Tait; Yinzhi Lang; Jieqiang Zhou; Phillip J Bergen; Anton Y Peleg; Jürgen B Bulitta; Antonio Oliver; Roger L Nation; Cornelia B Landersdorfer Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Estefany Garcia; John K Diep; Rajnikant Sharma; Patrick O Hanafin; Cely S Abboud; Keith S Kaye; Jian Li; Tony Velkov; Gauri G Rao Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Courtney L Luterbach; Hongqiang Qiu; Patrick O Hanafin; Rajnikant Sharma; Joseph Piscitelli; Feng-Chang Lin; Jenni Ilomaki; Eric Cober; Robert A Salata; Robert C Kalayjian; Richard R Watkins; Yohei Doi; Keith S Kaye; Roger L Nation; Robert A Bonomo; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; David van Duin; Gauri G Rao Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Yanqin Huang; Karol Sokolowski; Amisha Rana; Nidhi Singh; Jiping Wang; Ke Chen; Yinzhi Lang; Jieqiang Zhou; Neera Kadiyala; Fiorella Krapp; Egon A Ozer; Alan R Hauser; Jian Li; Jürgen B Bulitta; Zackery P Bulman Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 5.191