Literature DB >> 32387405

Cranioplasty: A Comprehensive Review of the History, Materials, Surgical Aspects, and Complications.

Ali Alkhaibary1, Ahoud Alharbi2, Nada Alnefaie2, Ahmed Aloraidi3, Sami Khairy3.   

Abstract

Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure performed to reconstruct cranial defects. The materials used to replace bone defects have evolved throughout history. Cranioplasty materials can be broadly divided into biological and synthetic materials. Biological materials can be further subdivided into autologous grafts, allografts, and xenografts. Allografts (bony materials and cartilage from cadavers) and xenografts (bony materials from animals) are out of favor for use in cranioplasty because of their high rates of infection, resorption, and rejection. In autologous cranioplasty, either the cranial bone itself or bones from other parts of the body of the patient are used. Synthetic bone grafts have reduced the operation time and led to better cosmetic results because of the advancement of computer-based customization and three-dimensional printing. Aluminum was the first synthetic bone graft material used, but it was found to irritate neural tissue, induce seizures, and dissolve over time. Acrylic, in the form of methyl methacrylate, is the most widely used material in cranioplasty. Hydroxyapatite is a natural component of bone and is believed to enhance bone repair, resulting in decreased tissue reactions and promoting good osteointegration. Polyetheretherketones are light and nonconductive and do not interfere with imaging modalities. The complication rates of cranioplasty are high, and surgical site infection is the most common complication. The effect of cranioplasty timing on cognitive function remains debatable. However, the timing of cranioplasty is independent of neurologic outcomes. In this article, the history, materials, complications, and evolution of current practices used in cranioplasty are comprehensively reviewed.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranioplasty; History; Materials; Review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32387405     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  15 in total

1.  [Application of two-stage operation on free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap transplantation and skull contour reconstruction in treatment of head titanium mesh exposure with soft tissue infection].

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yudi Han; Lei Cui; Jun Shu; Lingli Guo; Ran Tao; Yonghong Lei; Yan Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 2.  Paradigm Shift in Materials for Skull Reconstruction Facilitated by Science and Technological Integration.

Authors:  Arushi Beri; Sweta G Pisulkar; Akansha V Bansod; Chinmayee Dahihandekar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-03

3.  Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Dominik Wesp; Harald Krenzlin; Dragan Jankovic; Malte Ottenhausen; Max Jägersberg; Florian Ringel; Naureen Keric
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Editorial: Decompressive Craniectomy and Cranioplasty - Challenges and Chances.

Authors:  Ciaran Scott Hill; Christian Henker; Julius Höhne
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Different materials of cranioplasty for patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wanchun Yang; Junhong Li; Tengfei Li; Mingrong Zuo; Yufan Xiang; Xingwang Zhou; Jun Zheng; Hao Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Ultrasounds induce blood-brain barrier opening across a sonolucent polyolefin plate in an in vitro isolated brain preparation.

Authors:  Laura Librizzi; Laura Uva; Luca Raspagliesi; Matteo Gionso; Maria Cristina Regondi; Giovanni Durando; Francesco DiMeco; Marco de Curtis; Francesco Prada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Three-dimensional deep learning to automatically generate cranial implant geometry.

Authors:  Chieh-Tsai Wu; Yao-Hung Yang; Yau-Zen Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of the Fitting Accuracy of CAD/CAM-Manufactured Patient-Specific Implants for the Reconstruction of Cranial Defects-A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Henriette L Moellmann; Vanessa N Mehr; Nadia Karnatz; Max Wilkat; Erik Riedel; Majeed Rana
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Ahmed Aloraidi; Ali Alkhaibary; Ahoud Alharbi; Nada Alnefaie; Abeer Alaglan; Abdulaziz AlQarni; Turki Elarjani; Ala Arab; Jamal M Abdullah; Abdulaziz Oqalaa Almubarak; Munzir Abbas; Ibtesam Khairy; Wedad H Almadani; Mohammed Alowhaibi; Abdulaziz Alarifi; Sami Khairy; Ahmed Alkhani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-07

Review 10.  Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Overview.

Authors:  Peng-Ran Liu; Lin Lu; Jia-Yao Zhang; Tong-Tong Huo; Song-Xiang Liu; Zhe-Wei Ye
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.