Sang Hyeon Ahn1, Eun Jung Lee2, Jong-Gyun Ha3, Chi Sang Hwang2, Joo-Heon Yoon4, Chang-Hoon Kim4, Hyung-Ju Cho5. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Daejin Medical Center, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; Department of Medicine, The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea; The Airway Mucus Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea; The Airway Mucus Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: hyungjucho@yuhs.ac.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Most patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) complain of olfactory and/or taste dysfunctions. However, olfactory and taste dysfunctions depending on the subtype of CRS, classified as eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) and non-eosinophilic CRS (NCRS), have not been clearly reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features in olfactory and taste functions according to the subtype classified as ECRS and NCRS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery and were diagnosed with CRS. The patients were divided into ECRS and NCRS groups, according to their Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) scores. We analyzed demographic characteristics, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test findings, Lund-Mackay score, and the results of previously-validated tests, including the Korean Version of Sniffin' Stick test and chemical gustatory function test. RESULTS: Patients with ECRS and NCRS had decreased olfactory and taste functions compared to the control group. In particular, the olfactory score of ECRS patients was lower than that of NCRS patients (18.1 ± 9.5 vs 23.7 ± 8.5, respectively, p <0.001). On the other hand, taste scores of ECRS patients were not statistically different compared to NCRS patients (19.1 ± 4.7 vs. 18.3 ± 4.7, respectively, p = 0.166). Olfactory score decreased with increase in JESREC score (r=-0.203, p = 0.002), but it had no correlation with taste score (r = 0.072, p = 0.276). CONCLUSION: We found a difference in olfactory function but no difference in taste function between patients in ECRS and NCRS groups. These results may provide valuable clinical features in terms of olfactory and taste functions according to the subtypes of CRS.
OBJECTIVE: Most patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) complain of olfactory and/or taste dysfunctions. However, olfactory and taste dysfunctions depending on the subtype of CRS, classified as eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) and non-eosinophilic CRS (NCRS), have not been clearly reported. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features in olfactory and taste functions according to the subtype classified as ECRS and NCRS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery and were diagnosed with CRS. The patients were divided into ECRS and NCRS groups, according to their Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) scores. We analyzed demographic characteristics, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test findings, Lund-Mackay score, and the results of previously-validated tests, including the Korean Version of Sniffin' Stick test and chemical gustatory function test. RESULTS:Patients with ECRS and NCRS had decreased olfactory and taste functions compared to the control group. In particular, the olfactory score of ECRS patients was lower than that of NCRS patients (18.1 ± 9.5 vs 23.7 ± 8.5, respectively, p <0.001). On the other hand, taste scores of ECRS patients were not statistically different compared to NCRS patients (19.1 ± 4.7 vs. 18.3 ± 4.7, respectively, p = 0.166). Olfactory score decreased with increase in JESREC score (r=-0.203, p = 0.002), but it had no correlation with taste score (r = 0.072, p = 0.276). CONCLUSION: We found a difference in olfactory function but no difference in taste function between patients in ECRS and NCRS groups. These results may provide valuable clinical features in terms of olfactory and taste functions according to the subtypes of CRS.