Literature DB >> 32386762

Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with thoracotomy in bronchial sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer.

Dong Xie1, Jiajun Deng1, Diego Gonzalez-Rivas2, Yuming Zhu1, Lei Jiang1, Gening Jiang1, Chang Chen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the adequacy of bronchial sleeve lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in perioperative outcomes and its oncological efficacy by comparing with thoracotomy in a balanced population.
METHODS: A total of 363 patients who received bronchial sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer from January 2013 to December 2017 were included and placed in the thoracotomy (n = 251) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (n = 112) groups. Statistical analyses were performed to compare patients' demographics, perioperative outcomes, and survival between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: A total of 116 thoracotomy cases were matched with 72 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases by propensity score. Compared with thoracotomy, patients in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group after matching had less intraoperative blood loss (P < .01) and length of postoperative hospital stay (P < .01), duration of chest tube drainage (P < .01), and intensive care unit stay (P = .03) despite comparable operative time, complication rate, and 30- to 90-day mortality rate. The overall survival and recurrence-free survival were similar in patients who received sleeve lobectomy by thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (log-rank, P = .24 and .20, respectively) at 3 years. Although advanced TNM stage was independently associated with worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival in multivariable analysis, older age was only predictive for worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07; P = .02). Body mass index was also found be a predictive factor (overall survival: hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99, P = .03; recurrence-free survival: hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.99, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection and continued experience, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery appears to be safe in the short-term perioperative period and does not appear to comprise oncologic outcomes in performing sleeve lobectomy.
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lung cancer; sleeve lobectomy; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32386762     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy sleeve lobectomy.

Authors:  Yifan Zhong; Yang Wang; Xuefei Hu; Gege Wang; Yunlang She; Jiajun Deng; Lei Zhang; Qiao Peng; Yuming Zhu; Gening Jiang; Minglei Yang; Dong Xie; Chang Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted bronchial single sleeve lobectomy for 104 consecutive patients with centrally located non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ao Liu; Yandong Zhao; Tong Qiu; Yunpeng Xuan; Yi Qin; Xiao Sun; Rongjian Xu; Wenxing Du; Zhe Wu; Giulia Veronesi; Dario Amore; Wenjie Jiao
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-05

3.  A meta-analysis of minimally invasive surgery versus thoracotomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhengjun Li; Mozhu Xia; Chang Liu; Tao Wang; Yi Ren; Yongyu Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Bronchial Sleeve Resection with Complete Pulmonary Preservation: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Jiangnan Duan; Haomin Cai; Wei Huang; Lin Lin; Liang Wu; Jiang Fan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Trend of lung cancer surgery, hospital selection, and survival between 2005 and 2016 in South Korea.

Authors:  Dohun Kim; Gil-Won Kang; Hoyeon Jang; Jun Yeun Cho; Bumhee Yang; Hee Chul Yang; Jinwook Hwang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  The learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy in a high-volume pulmonary center.

Authors:  Jiajun Deng; Lei Jiang; Shenghui Li; Lei Zhang; Yifan Zhong; Dong Xie; Chang Chen
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-07-20

7.  Minimally invasive carinal reconstruction-is less really more?

Authors:  Anna Elisabeth Frick; Konrad Hoetzenecker
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11

8.  Goal-directed therapy based on rScO2 monitoring in elderly patients with one-lung ventilation: a randomized trial on perioperative inflammation and postoperative delirium.

Authors:  Jing-Yu Wang; Ming Li; Pei Wang; Ping Fang
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.728

9.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes among non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy, EGFR-TKI, and chemotherapy alone: a real-world evidence study.

Authors:  Deping Zhao; Long Xu; Junqi Wu; Yunlang She; Hang Su; Likun Hou; Haoran E; Lei Zhang; Francesco Grossi; Melanie P Subramanian; Anthony W Kim; Yuming Zhu; Chang Chen
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.