Sophie Juul1, Niklas Nielsen2, Peter Bentzer2, Areti Angeliki Veroniki3,4, Lehana Thabane5, Adam Linder2, Sarah Klingenberg6, Christian Gluud6, Janus Christian Jakobsen6,7. 1. Copenhagen Trial Unit - Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. sophie.juul@ctu.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia & Intensive care, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 3. Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece. 4. Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 6. Copenhagen Trial Unit - Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. 7. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is a rapidly spreading virus infection that has quickly caused extensive burden to individual, families, countries, and the globe. No intervention has yet been proven effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Some randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of different drugs have been published, and more are currently underway. There is an urgent need for a living, dynamic systematic review that continuously evaluates the beneficial and harmful effects of all available interventions for COVID-19. METHODS/ DESIGN: We will conduct a living systematic review based on searches of major medical databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and clinical trial registries from their inception onwards to identify relevant randomized clinical trials. We will update the literature search once a week to continuously assess if new evidence is available. Two review authors will independently extract data and perform risk of bias assessment. We will include randomized clinical trials comparing any intervention for the treatment of COVID-19 (e.g., pharmacological interventions, fluid therapy, invasive or noninvasive ventilation, or similar interventions) with any comparator (e.g., an "active" comparator, standard care, placebo, no intervention, or "active placebo") for participants in all age groups with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be admission to intensive care, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, quality of life, and non-serious adverse events. The living systematic review will include aggregate data meta-analyses, Trial Sequential Analyses, network meta-analysis, and individual patient data meta-analyses. Risk of bias will be assessed with domains, an eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). DISCUSSION: COVID-19 has become a pandemic with substantial mortality. A living systematic review evaluating the beneficial and harmful effects of pharmacological and other interventions is urgently needed. This review will continuously inform best practice in treatment and clinical research of this highly prevalent disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020178787.
BACKGROUND:COVID-19 is a rapidly spreading virus infection that has quickly caused extensive burden to individual, families, countries, and the globe. No intervention has yet been proven effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Some randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of different drugs have been published, and more are currently underway. There is an urgent need for a living, dynamic systematic review that continuously evaluates the beneficial and harmful effects of all available interventions for COVID-19. METHODS/ DESIGN: We will conduct a living systematic review based on searches of major medical databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and clinical trial registries from their inception onwards to identify relevant randomized clinical trials. We will update the literature search once a week to continuously assess if new evidence is available. Two review authors will independently extract data and perform risk of bias assessment. We will include randomized clinical trials comparing any intervention for the treatment of COVID-19 (e.g., pharmacological interventions, fluid therapy, invasive or noninvasive ventilation, or similar interventions) with any comparator (e.g., an "active" comparator, standard care, placebo, no intervention, or "active placebo") for participants in all age groups with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be admission to intensive care, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, quality of life, and non-serious adverse events. The living systematic review will include aggregate data meta-analyses, Trial Sequential Analyses, network meta-analysis, and individual patient data meta-analyses. Risk of bias will be assessed with domains, an eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). DISCUSSION: COVID-19 has become a pandemic with substantial mortality. A living systematic review evaluating the beneficial and harmful effects of pharmacological and other interventions is urgently needed. This review will continuously inform best practice in treatment and clinical research of this highly prevalent disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020178787.
Authors: Simon Turner; Natalia Botero-Tovar; Maria Alejandra Herrera; Juan Pablo Borda Kuhlmann; Francisco Ortiz; Jean Carlo Ramírez; Luisa Fernanda Maldonado Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Lyle Armstrong; Joseph Collin; Islam Mostafa; Rachel Queen; Francisco C Figueiredo; Majlinda Lako Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Giuseppe Cardillo; Giuseppe Vito Viggiano; Vincenzo Russo; Sara Mangiacapra; Antonella Cavalli; Giampiero Castaldo; Federica Agrusta; Annamaria Bellizzi; Maria Amitrano; Mariateresa Iannuzzo; Clara Sacco; Corrado Lodigiani; Andrea Fontanella; Pierpaolo Di Micco Journal: J Blood Med Date: 2021-02-11
Authors: Sophie Juul; Emil Eik Nielsen; Joshua Feinberg; Faiza Siddiqui; Caroline Kamp Jørgensen; Emily Barot; Johan Holgersson; Niklas Nielsen; Peter Bentzer; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Lehana Thabane; Fanlong Bu; Sarah Klingenberg; Christian Gluud; Janus Christian Jakobsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Reed Ac Siemieniuk; Jessica J Bartoszko; Dena Zeraatkar; Elena Kum; Anila Qasim; Juan Pablo Díaz Martinez; Ariel Izcovich; Francois Lamontagne; Mi Ah Han; Arnav Agarwal; Thomas Agoritsas; Maria Azab; Gonzalo Bravo; Derek K Chu; Rachel Couban; Tahira Devji; Zaira Escamilla; Farid Foroutan; Ya Gao; Long Ge; Maryam Ghadimi; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Kimia Honarmand; Liangying Hou; Quazi Ibrahim; Assem Khamis; Bonnie Lam; Christian Mansilla; Mark Loeb; Anna Miroshnychenko; Maura Marcucci; Shelley L McLeod; Sharhzad Motaghi; Srinivas Murthy; Reem A Mustafa; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Gabriel Rada; Yamna Rizwan; Pakeezah Saadat; Charlotte Switzer; Lehana Thabane; George Tomlinson; Per O Vandvik; Robin Wm Vernooij; Andrés Viteri-García; Ying Wang; Liang Yao; Yunli Zhao; Gordon H Guyatt; Romina Brignardello-Petersen Journal: BMJ Date: 2020-07-30