Literature DB >> 3238642

Influence of breathing pattern on lung deposition and bronchodilator response to nebulised salbutamol in patients with stable asthma.

B M Zainudin1, S E Tolfree, M Short, S G Spiro.   

Abstract

The influence of breathing pattern on lung deposition and bronchodilator response to nebulised salbutamol is uncertain. Three different breathing patterns were assessed in eight patients with chronic stable asthma. Salbutamol solution (2.5 mg in 4 ml) mixed with technetium-99m labelled human serum albumin was nebulised by an Acorn nebuliser at a flow rate of 6 litres a minute. Particles with a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 4.8 microns were produced for inhalation by (a) tidal breathing, (b) six tidal breaths followed by three deep breaths, and (c) six tidal breaths followed by three deep breaths with a five second breath hold after each breath. Each breathing pattern was continued for four minutes. There was no significant difference in the percentage of radioaerosol deposited in the lung or in the distribution of radioaerosol within the lung as assessed by gamma camera imaging. Changes in bronchodilator responses as measured by peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC) 30, 45, and 60 minutes after inhalation were similar for the three studies. The mean (SEM) maximum percentage change in FEV1 was 44 (7.1), 47 (9.2), and 51 (8.4) for studies 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The percentage of nebulised solution deposited in the body was also similar for the three breathing patterns--that is, 11-13%, of which 98% entered the lung. This study shows that inhaling a nebulised aerosol by tidal breathing, the simplest method, is as effective as tidal breathing with deep breaths with or without a breath hold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3238642      PMCID: PMC461611          DOI: 10.1136/thx.43.12.987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  10 in total

Review 1.  Deposition of aerosol in the respiratory tract.

Authors:  J D Brain; P A Valberg
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1979-12

2.  Effect of nebulised aerosol size on lung deposition in patients with mild asthma.

Authors:  M M Clay; S W Clarke
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Pharmacokinetics of inhaled substances.

Authors:  D S Davies
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  The importance of particle size in response to inhaled bronchodilators.

Authors:  P J Rees; T J Clark; F Morén
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis Suppl       Date:  1982

5.  A comparison of the effects of different methods of administration of beta-2-sympathomimetics in patients with asthma.

Authors:  J Webb; J Rees; T J Clark
Journal:  Br J Dis Chest       Date:  1982-10

6.  Deposition and fate of aerosolized drugs.

Authors:  M T Newhouse; R E Ruffin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Differences between pressurized aerosol and stable dust particles.

Authors:  S W Clarke; S P Newman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Pressurized bronchodilator aerosol technique: influence of breath-holding time and relationship of inhaler to the mouth.

Authors:  P Lawford
Journal:  Br J Dis Chest       Date:  1982-07

9.  Aerosolised pentamidine as sole therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

Authors:  A B Montgomery; R J Debs; J M Luce; K J Corkery; J Turner; E N Brunette; E T Lin; P C Hopewell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-08-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Deposition of pressurised aerosols in the human respiratory tract.

Authors:  S P Newman; D Pavia; F Morén; N F Sheahan; S W Clarke
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.139

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Severe acute asthma.

Authors:  S Salmeron; M Bard; F X Blanc; A Ellrodt
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Drug delivery from jet nebulisers.

Authors:  M L Everard; A R Clark; A D Milner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  [Can mesh nebulizers improve prehospital aerosol therapy? An in vitro study on simulated prehospital emergency patients suffering from respiratory distress].

Authors:  M Otto; Y Kropp; L Kummer; M Thiel; C Tsagogiorgas
Journal:  Anaesthesiologie       Date:  2022-08-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.