| Literature DB >> 32385802 |
Sheila N Ferraz1, Gabriela F Costa2, José Abraão Carneiro Neto1, Thiago Hebert2, Cassius J V de Oliveira1, Mariele Guerra1, Lívia M A Oliveira1, Edgar M Carvalho3,4,5.
Abstract
A high proviral load (PVL) is recognized as a risk factor for human T cell leukemia virus-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP), but there is a lack of prospective studies evaluating whether or not HTLV-1 carriers with high PVL are at risk of developing HAM/TSP or other HTLV-1-related diseases. Here, we compare the incidence of clinical manifestations and the cytokine levels in 30 HTLV-1 carriers with high (> 50,000 copies/106 PBMC) and an equal number of subjects with low proviral load. Participants were followed for 3 to 16 years (median of 11 years). The PVL, IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-10 levels were quantified at entry and at the end of the follow-up. Among the self-reported symptoms in the initial evaluation, only the presence of paresthesia on the hands was more frequent in the group with high PVL (p < 0.04). The production of IFN-γ was higher in the group with high PVL group (median of 1308 versus 686 pg/ml, p < 0.011) when compared with the control group in the first assessment. There was no difference in the occurrence of urinary symptoms or erectile dysfunction, periodontal disease, Sicca syndrome, and neurologic signs between the two groups during the follow-up. The observation that none of the HTLV-1 carriers with high PVL and with exaggerated inflammatory response progressed to HAM/TSP indicates that other factors in addition to the PVL and an exaggerated immune response are involved in the pathogenesis of HAM/TSP.Entities:
Keywords: HTLV-1; HTLV-1 carriers; HTLV-1-associated myelopathy; Myelopathy; Proviral load
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32385802 PMCID: PMC7438297 DOI: 10.1007/s13365-020-00847-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurovirol ISSN: 1355-0284 Impact factor: 2.643
Demographic, epidemiologic characteristics, and clinical aspects of HTLV-1 carriers, classified according to the proviral load at study entry
| Characteristic | High proviral load carriers ( | Low proviral load carriers ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | 20 (66.7%) | 20 (66.7%) | |
| Median age. y | 55.5 (± 11.6) | 56.2 (± 11.2) | = 0.81c |
| Patient Referral | = 0.19a | ||
| Blood banks | 18 (60%) | 24 (80%) | |
| Other clinics | 1 (3.3%) | 0 | |
| Relatives | 1 (3.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | |
| Others | 10 (33.3%) | 4 (13.3%) | |
| Blood transfusion | 4 (13.8%) | 1 (3.3%) | = 0.19b |
| Years of follow-up (median [interquartile range]) | 11 (8.5–13) | 11.5 (8–12) | =0 .57c |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Diabetes mellitus | 4 (13.3%) | 3 (10%) | > 0.99b |
| Hypothyroidism | 3 (10%) | 1 (3.3%) | = 0.61b |
| Osteoarthritis | 7 (23.3%) | 13 (43.3%) | = 0.10a |
| HBV infection | 0 | 1(3.3%) | > 0.99b |
| HCV infection | 0 | 1 (3.3%) | > 0.99b |
*Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used if characteristic was categorical and Mann-Whitney U test if continuous
a χ2 test; b Fisher’s exact test; c Mann-Whitney U test
HTLV-1, human T-cell leukemia virus-1; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus
Clinical symptoms and signs in HTLV-1-infected subjects with high or low proviral load at admission and in the last evaluation
| Clinical features | Low proviral load carriers | High proviral load carriers | Comparison between groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Admission | Final evaluation | Admission | Final evaluation | Admission | ||||
| Urological symptoms | 4 (13.3%) | 4 (13.3%) | > 0.99 | 5 (16.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | 1 | > 0.99b | 0.99b |
| Effort urinating | 3 (10%) | 0 | 0.25 | 1 (3.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | > 0.99 | 0.61b | 0.49b |
| Urgency | 1 (3.3%) | 0 | > 0.99 | 0 | 0 | – | > 0.99b | – |
| Stress urinary incontinence | 0 | 0 | – | 3 (10%) | 1 (3.3%) | 0.63 | 0.24b | > 0.99b |
| Erectile dysfunction | 0 | 3/10 (30%) | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0.21b |
| Others | 0 | 1 (3.3%) | > 0.99 | 1 (3.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | > 0.99 | > 0.99b | > 0.99b |
| Neurological symptoms | ||||||||
| Difficulty running | 2 (6.7%) | 6 (20%) | 0.22 | 3 (10%) | 5 (16.7%) | 0.69 | > 0.99b | 0.74c |
| Difficulty walking | 0 | 3 (10%) | 0.25 | 1 (3.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | > 0.99 | > 0.99b | > 0.99b |
| Hand numbness | 2 (6.7%) | 4 (13.3%) | 0.68 | 8 (26.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | 0.51 | 0.04c | > 0.99b |
| Foot numbness | 2 (6.7%) | 4 (13.3%) | 0.68 | 7 (23.3%) | 6 (20%) | > 0.99 | 0.14b | 0.49c |
| Biceps hyperreflexia | 4 (13.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | 0.5 | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (3.3%) | 1 | 0.35 c | > 0.99b |
| Patellar hyperreflexia | 4 (13.3%) | 5 (16.7%) | > 0.99 | 5(16.7%) | 7(23.3%) | 0.62 | > 0.99b | 0.52c |
| Babinski sign | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Rheumatological symptoms | ||||||||
| Joint pain | ||||||||
| Monoarticular | 1/28 (3.6%) | 4 (13.3%) | 0.5 | 2 (6.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | 0.37 | > 0.99b | > 0.99b |
| Oligoarticular | 1/28 (3.6%) | 3 (10%) | 0.62 | 1 (3.3%) | 7 (23.3%) | 0.07 | > 0.99b | 0.16c |
| Polyarticular | 0/28 | 2 (6.7%) | 0.5 | 0 | 1 (3.3%) | > 0.99 | – | > 0.99b |
| Xerostomia | 4 (13.3%) | 6/23 (26.1%) | 0.68 | 3 (10%) | 9/25 (36%) | 0.03 | > 0.99b | 0.46c |
| Xerophthalmia | 6/29 (20.7%) | 6 (20%) | > 0.99 | 5 (16.7%) | 13 (43.3%) | 0.06 | 0.69c | 0.052c |
| Periodontal disease | 6/16 (37.5%) | 12/21 (57.1%) | > 0.99 | 11/24 (45.8%) | 12/24 (50%) | > 0.99 | 0.60c | 0.63c |
*Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used if characteristic was categorical and McNemar test for paired data
a McNemar test; B Fisher’s exact test; c χ2 Test
Fig. 1Comparative analysis between the baseline proviral load and the last evaluation in HTLV-1 carriers with high and low proviral load. Data represents the proviral load expressed as number of HTLV-1 copies per 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the statistical analysis. p value < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 2Cytokine concentrations in supernatants of unstimulated mononuclear cell cultures of HTLV-1 carriers with high and low proviral load at study entry and at the last evaluation: a IFN-γ, b TNF, c IL10. Cytokine levels were measured by ELISA in supernatant of unstimulated 3 × 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells after 72 h of incubation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the statistical analysis. p value < 0.05 was considered significant
Correlations between serum cytokines and proviral load from HTLV-1 carriers at study entry and at the last evaluation
| Correlations | High proviral load carriers | Low proviral load carriers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study entry | Last evaluation | Study entry | Last evaluation | |
| IFN-γ x PVL | − 0.013 (= 0.95) | − 0.23 (= 0.29) | 0.55 (< 0.01) | 0.65 (< 0.001) |
| TNF x PVL | 0.117 (= 0.54) | 0.002 (= 0.99) | 0.29 (= 0.12) | 0.43 (= 0.03) |
| IL10 x PVL | 0.15 (= 0.41) | 0.27 (= 0.24) | 0.30 (= 0.11) | 0.20 (= 0.37) |
| IFN-γ x TNF | 0.45 (= 0.01) | 0.72 (< 0.001) | 0.54 (< 0.001) | 0.60 (= 0.001) |
| IFN-γ x IL10 | 0.30 (= 0.10) | 0.76 (< 0.001) | 0.45 (= 0.01) | 0.31 (= 0.14) |
| TNF x IL10 | 0.48 (< 0.01) | 0.45 (= 0.03) | 0.35 (= 0.06) | 0.45 (= 0.03) |
Spearman correlations were calculated between parameters. The “r” indexes are shown, as well the (p value)
PVL, proviral load