Literature DB >> 32385758

Performance evaluation of a commercial line blot assay system for detection of myositis- and systemic sclerosis-related autoantibodies.

Yasuhito Hamaguchi1, Masataka Kuwana2, Kazuhiko Takehara3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/
OBJECTIVES: A line blot (LB) assay is a multi-analyte platform capable of simultaneously detecting multiple anti-nuclear antibody specificities. Here, we evaluated the performance of a commercial LB assay developed for the identification of myositis- or systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related autoantibodies (autoAbs).
METHOD: We screened 300 serum samples from patients with various connective tissue diseases using an LB assay and compared the results of myositis- or SSc-related autoAbs with those identified by RNA and protein immunoprecipitation (IP) assays or indirect immunofluorescence (IIF).
RESULTS: The IP assays revealed anti-Jo-1 Abs in 14 patients, anti-EJ Abs in 12, anti-PL-7 Abs in 8, anti-PL-12 Abs in 4, anti-Mi-2 Abs in 6, anti-SRP Abs in 8, anti-topoisomerase I Abs in 54, anti-RNA polymerase III Abs in 24, anti-U3 RNP Abs in 9, anti-Th/To Abs in 9, anti-Ku Abs in 14 and anti-hUBF Abs in 4, whereas IIF identified anti-centromere in 35. Good agreement between the IP assays and the LB assay was found only for anti-Jo-1 and anti-centromere antibodies. When a cut-off was adjusted to reconcile with the results of IP assays, the detection performance of LB assay was improved for anti-EJ, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-SRP, anti-topoisomerase I and anti-RNA polymerase III Abs. However, the results of anti-Mi-2, anti-U3 RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-hUBF and anti-Ku Abs remained discordant between the LB assay and IP assays at all cut-off levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of myositis- or SSc-related autoAbs using a commercial LB assay requires great caution since it can yield analytically false-positive or false-negative results. Key Points • A line blot (LB) assay is a multi-analyte platform capable of simultaneously detecting multiple antibodies with anti-nuclear specificities. • Detection of myositis- or systemic sclerosis-related autoantibodies using a commercial LB assay requires great caution since it can yield analytically false-positive or false-negative results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoantibody; Dermatomyositis; Immunoprecipitation assay; Line blot assay; Systemic sclerosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32385758     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04973-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

1.  Clinical value of cancer-associated myositis-specific antibodies, anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1-γ, and anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 antibodies in a retrospective cohort of dermatomyositis/polymyositis in a Japanese community hospital.

Authors:  Takeshi Suga; Hiroshi Oiwa; Michihiro Ishida; Yasuo Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  The Clinicopathological Distinction Between Seropositive and Seronegative Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy in China.

Authors:  Xue Ma; Li Xu; Suqiong Ji; Yue Li; Bitao Bu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  Myositis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: A Respiratory Physician's Point of View.

Authors:  Yuko Waseda
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  The phenotype of myositis patients with anti-Ku autoantibodies.

Authors:  Maria Casal-Dominguez; Iago Pinal-Fernandez; Assia Derfoul; Rose Graf; Harlan Michelle; Jemima Albayda; Eleni Tiniakou; Brittany Adler; Sonye K Danoff; Thomas E Lloyd; Lisa Christoper-Stine; Julie J Paik; Andrew L Mammen
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.431

5.  A Comparison of Line Blots, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent, and RNA-immunoprecipitation Assays of Antisynthetase Antibodies in Serum Samples from 44 Patients.

Authors:  Koichiro Shinoda; Maiko Okumura; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Atsushi Matsui; Reina Tsuda; Hiroyuki Hounoki; Shigeaki Suzuki; Kazuyuki Tobe
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.