Literature DB >> 32385757

Efficacy and safety of Romosozumab in treatment for low bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sara Kaveh1,2, Hossein Hosseinifard3, Nashmil Ghadimi1, Mahdi Vojdanian4, Aidin Aryankhesal5.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic skeletal disease with an increasing prevalence. Romosozumab, as a monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody with a dual function, has been produced. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to examine the efficacy of Romosozumab in patients with low bone mineral density. A systematic search was conducted in the most important electronic search engines like Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov at the end of July 2019 to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated the effect of Romosozumab in patients with osteoporosis and/or low bone mineral density. After evaluating the quality of articles with the Cochrane checklist, data related to the outcomes of bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, risk of clinical, vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, and risk of adverse events were extracted. Quality of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated by I2 and Q statistics. The meta-analysis was performed using CMA v.2.0 software. Of all the 671 initially retrieved articles, seven articles were entered into the meta-analysis after removing duplicates and reviewing papers with inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analysis showed that Romosozumab 210, 140, and 70 mg compared with Alendronate, Teriparatide, and placebo can increase the bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The risk of adverse events like adjudicated cardiovascular serious adverse events and adjudicated cardiovascular death was more in Romosozumab 210 mg in comparison with placebo. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Treatment with anti-sclerostin antibodies can be a proper therapeutic option in patients with osteoporosis and low bone mineral density. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, it seems that Romosozumab, with its dual function, has a positive role in the treatment of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMG 785; Bone diseases; Meta-analysis; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32385757     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04948-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  10 in total

Review 1.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  National consensus statement by the Austrian Societies for Rheumatology, Pulmonology, Infectiology, Dermatology and Gastroenterology regarding the management of latent tuberculosis and the associated utilization of biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

Authors:  Eva Rath; Michael Bonelli; Christina Duftner; Johann Gruber; Peter Mandl; Florentine Moazedi-Furst; Herwig Pieringer; Rudolf Puchner; Holger Flick; Helmut J F Salzer; Günter Weiss; Stefan Winkler; Hans Skvara; Alexander Moschen; Harald Hofer; Julia Feurstein; Judith Sautner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.275

3.  Fenoldopam Sensitizes Primary Cilia-Mediated Mechanosensing to Promote Osteogenic Intercellular Signaling and Whole Bone Adaptation.

Authors:  Milos Spasic; Michael P Duffy; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.390

Review 4.  Metabolic Bone Diseases and New Drug Developments.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Natesan; Sung-Jin Kim
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.231

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Bone Fragility: From Osteogenesis Imperfecta to Secondary Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Gazzar; Wolfgang Högler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The Impact of COVID-19 on the Optimal Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Bo Kwon Hwang; Byung-Ho Yoon
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-05-31

Review 7.  The Role of Adipokines and Bone Marrow Adipocytes in Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Eunah Shin; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Management of Myeloma Bone Lesions.

Authors:  Jeng-Shiun Du; Chia-Hung Yen; Chin-Mu Hsu; Hui-Hua Hsiao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  The Effects of Osteoporotic and Non-osteoporotic Medications on Fracture Risk and Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Anna C van der Burgh; Catherine E de Keyser; M Carola Zillikens; Bruno H Stricker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Serum Sclerostin Level Is Negatively Associated with Bone Mineral Density in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Jing-Wun Lu; Ru-Jiang Syu; Chih-Hsien Wang; Bang-Gee Hsu; Jen-Pi Tsai
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.