| Literature DB >> 32384651 |
Lu Leng1, Ziyuan Yang2, Cheonshik Kim3, Yue Zhang1.
Abstract
Fecal trait examinations are critical in the clinical diagnosis of digestive diseases, and they can effectively reveal various aspects regarding the health of the digestive system. An automatic feces detection and trait recognition system based on a visual sensor could greatly alleviate the burden on medical inspectors and overcome many sanitation problems, such as infections. Unfortunately, the lack of digital medical images acquired with camera sensors due to patient privacy has obstructed the development of fecal examinations. In general, the computing power of an automatic fecal diagnosis machine or a mobile computer-aided diagnosis device is not always enough to run a deep network. Thus, a light-weight practical framework is proposed, which consists of three stages: illumination normalization, feces detection, and trait recognition. Illumination normalization effectively suppresses the illumination variances that degrade the recognition accuracy. Neither the shape nor the location is fixed, so shape-based and location-based object detection methods do not work well in this task. Meanwhile, this leads to a difficulty in labeling the images for training convolutional neural networks (CNN) in detection. Our segmentation scheme is free from training and labeling. The feces object is accurately detected with a well-designed threshold-based segmentation scheme on the selected color component to reduce the background disturbance. Finally, the preprocessed images are categorized into five classes with a light-weight shallow CNN, which is suitable for feces trait examinations in real hospital environments. The experiment results from our collected dataset demonstrate that our framework yields a satisfactory accuracy of 98.4%, while requiring low computational complexity and storage.Entities:
Keywords: convolutional neural network; feces trait recognition; illumination normalization method; light-weight framework; object detection; visual sensor
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32384651 PMCID: PMC7248729 DOI: 10.3390/s20092644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Feces trait classes.
Figure 2The framework of fecal trait examination.
Figure 3The grayscale maps in different color channels. (a) Represents the original image; (b–g) represent the red, green, blue, hue, saturation, and value channels, respectively.
Figure 4Saturation maps of different classes.
Figure 5Feces images under different illuminations.
Figure 6Accuracies with various layer numbers.
Normalized Hamming distances between the segmented images under different illuminations.
| Illumination Scale | Tar | Paste | Mucus | Watery | Loose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.0033 | 0.0047 | 0.0046 | 0.0053 | 0.0045 |
| 0.6 | 0.0028 | 0.0047 | 0.0039 | 0.0039 | 0.0039 |
| 0.7 | 0.0025 | 0.0038 | 0.0034 | 0.0029 | 0.0037 |
| 0.8 | 0.0022 | 0.0020 | 0.0034 | 0.0029 | 0.0028 |
| 0.9 | 0.0026 | 0.0024 | 0.0033 | 0.0021 | 0.0025 |
| 1.1 | 0.0058 | 0.0038 | 0.0041 | 0.0042 | 0.0060 |
| 1.2 | 0.0118 | 0.0056 | 0.0100 | 0.0060 | 0.0105 |
| 1.3 | 0.0281 | 0.0165 | 0.0128 | 0.0145 | 0.0191 |
| 1.4 | 0.0350 | 0.0282 | 0.0239 | 0.0203 | 0.0235 |
| 1.5 | 0.0417 | 0.0486 | 0.0380 | 0.0379 | 0.0282 |
Figure 7Accuracies at different illumination scales.
Accuracies of different methods.
| Training Set | ResNet [ | StoolNet [ | Proposed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single illumination | 43.01% | 84.37% | 98.33% |
| All illumination | 43.74% | 90.62% | 98.40% |