Literature DB >> 32384322

Molecular Heterogeneity of Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma: An Analysis of 166 Cases Using the Endometrial Cancer Subrogate Molecular Classification.

Susanna Leskela1,2, Ignacio Romero3, Juan M Rosa-Rosa1,2, Tamara Caniego-Casas1,2, Eva Cristobal1,2, Belén Pérez-Mies2,4, Ana Gutierrez-Pecharroman4, Almudena Santón2,4, Belén Ojeda5, Raquel López-Reig6, María L Palacios-Berraquero7, Encarna Andrada8, Santiago Montes9, Francisco Pastor10, Maria C Gomez11, José A López-Guerrero6, Andrés Poveda12, José Palacios1,2,4,13.   

Abstract

Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOC) has clinical and biological differences compared with other histologic types of ovarian carcinomas, but it shares morphologic and molecular features with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. To analyze the molecular heterogeneity of EOC according to the new molecular classification of endometrial cancer and to evaluate the prognostic significance of this molecular classification, we have analyzed 166 early-stage EOC by immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins and p53 expression, and by Sanger sequencing for the exonuclease domain of polymerase epsilon (POLE EDM). In addition, we have carried out next-generation sequencing analysis of tumors with POLE EDM mutations to confirm the ultramutated profile. Eight tumors carried POLE EDM mutations and were classified as ultramutated (5%), 29 showed mismatch repair deficiency and were classified as hypermutated (18%), 16 tumors had a mutated pattern of p53 expression and were classified as p53 abnormal (11%), and 114 tumors did not have any of the previous alterations and were classified as no specific type (66%). Five tumors showed >1 classification criteria. The frequencies of ultramutated and hypermutated tumors were lower in EOC compared with the frequency reported in endometrial cancer. Subrogate molecular groups differed in both morphologic features (histologic grade, squamous and morular metaplasia, and necrosis) and immunohistochemical expression of several biomarkers (ARID1A, nuclear β-catenin, estrogen receptors, Napsin A, and HINF1B). In addition, the number of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was higher in ultramutated and hypermutated tumors. The most commonly mutated genes in the ultramutated group were ARID1A (100%), PIK3R1, PTEN, BCOR, and TP53 (67% each), whereas no mutations were detected in KRAS. Although the prognosis did not differ among subgroups in the multivariate analysis, a trend toward a better prognosis in POLE-mutated and a worse prognosis in p53 abnormal tumors was observed. In addition, this classification could have important therapeutic implications for the use of immunotherapy in tumors classified as ultramutated and hypermutated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32384322     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  9 in total

1.  Validated biomarker assays confirm that ARID1A loss is confounded with MMR deficiency, CD8+ TIL infiltration, and provides no independent prognostic value in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Karolin Heinze; Tayyebeh M Nazeran; Sandra Lee; Pauline Krämer; Evan S Cairns; Derek S Chiu; Samuel Cy Leung; Eun Young Kang; Nicola S Meagher; Catherine J Kennedy; Jessica Boros; Friedrich Kommoss; Hans-Walter Vollert; Florian Heitz; Andreas du Bois; Philipp Harter; Marcel Grube; Bernhard Kraemer; Annette Staebler; Felix Kf Kommoss; Sabine Heublein; Hans-Peter Sinn; Naveena Singh; Angela Laslavic; Esther Elishaev; Alex Olawaiye; Kirsten Moysich; Francesmary Modugno; Raghwa Sharma; Alison H Brand; Paul R Harnett; Anna DeFazio; Renée T Fortner; Jan Lubinski; Marcin Lener; Aleksandra Tołoczko-Grabarek; Cezary Cybulski; Helena Gronwald; Jacek Gronwald; Penny Coulson; Mona A El-Bahrawy; Michael E Jones; Minouk J Schoemaker; Anthony J Swerdlow; Kylie L Gorringe; Ian Campbell; Linda Cook; Simon A Gayther; Michael E Carney; Yurii B Shvetsov; Brenda Y Hernandez; Lynne R Wilkens; Marc T Goodman; Constantina Mateoiu; Anna Linder; Karin Sundfeldt; Linda E Kelemen; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Martin Widschwendter; Usha Menon; Kelly L Bolton; Jennifer Alsop; Mitul Shah; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Paul Dp Pharoah; James D Brenton; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Holly R Harris; Jennifer A Doherty; Blake Gilks; Prafull Ghatage; David G Huntsman; Gregg S Nelson; Anna V Tinker; Cheng-Han Lee; Ellen L Goode; Brad H Nelson; Susan J Ramus; Stefan Kommoss; Aline Talhouk; Martin Köbel; Michael S Anglesio
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 9.883

2.  Comprehensive Approach to Genomic and Immune Profiling: Insights of a Real-World Experience in Gynecological Tumors.

Authors:  Iván Prieto-Potin; Franklin Idrovo; Ana Suárez-Gauthier; María Díaz-Blázquez; Laura Astilleros-Blanco de Córdova; Cristina Chamizo; Sandra Zazo; Nerea Carvajal; Almudena López-Sánchez; Sandra Pérez-Buira; Carmen Laura Aúz-Alexandre; Rebeca Manso; Jenifer Plaza-Sánchez; Virginia de Lucas-López; Nuria Pérez-González; Sara Martín-Valle; Ion Cristóbal; Victoria Casado; Jesús García-Foncillas; Federico Rojo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06

3.  Integrated molecular characterisation of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma identifies opportunities for stratification.

Authors:  Charlie Gourley; C Simon Herrington; Robert L Hollis; Barbara Stanley; John P Thomson; Michael Churchman; Ian Croy; Tzyvia Rye; Clare Bartos; Fiona Nussey; Melanie Mackean; Alison M Meynert; Colin A Semple
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 4.  A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Shuangfeng Chen; Yuebo Li; Lili Qian; Sisi Deng; Luwen Liu; Weihua Xiao; Ying Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Molecular stratification of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma predicts clinical outcome.

Authors:  Robert L Hollis; John P Thomson; Barbara Stanley; Michael Churchman; Alison M Meynert; Tzyvia Rye; Clare Bartos; Yasushi Iida; Ian Croy; Melanie Mackean; Fiona Nussey; Aikou Okamoto; Colin A Semple; Charlie Gourley; C Simon Herrington
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A Combined Long Noncoding RNA Signature as a Candidate Prognostic Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Hui Li; Shuoer Wang; Qianlan Yao; Yan Liu; Jing Yang; Lun Xu; Gong Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification.

Authors:  Martin Köbel; Eun Young Kang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Distinct transcriptional programs stratify ovarian cancer cell lines into the five major histological subtypes.

Authors:  Bethany M Barnes; Louisa Nelson; Anthony Tighe; George J Burghel; I-Hsuan Lin; Sudha Desai; Joanne C McGrail; Robert D Morgan; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Frequent POLE-driven hypermutation in ovarian endometrioid cancer revealed by mutational signatures in RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Jaime I Davila; Pritha Chanana; Vivekananda Sarangi; Zachary C Fogarty; S John Weroha; Ruifeng Guo; Ellen L Goode; Yajue Huang; Chen Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.063

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.