| Literature DB >> 32384140 |
Marguerita Saadeh1, Anna-Karin Welmer1,2, Serhiy Dekhtyar1, Laura Fratiglioni1,3, Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychological and social well-being are emerging as major determinants in preserving health in old age. We aimed to explore the association between these factors and the rate of decline in physical function over time in older adults.Entities:
Keywords: Functional decline; Mobility; Psychosocial; Well-being
Year: 2020 PMID: 32384140 PMCID: PMC7357580 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glaa114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ISSN: 1079-5006 Impact factor: 6.053
Baseline Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Lifestyle Characteristics of the Study Samples by Levels of Psychological and Social Well-being
| Psychological Well-being ( | Social Well-being ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High |
| Low | High |
| |
| Age (%) | ||||||
| <78 years | 390 (48.2) | 420 (51.9) | .111 | 443 (48.0) | 480 (52.0) | .467 |
| ≥78 years | 84 (61.3) | 53 (38.7) | 107 (60.8) | 69 (39.2) | ||
| Sex (%) | ||||||
| Men | 190 (47.5) | 210 (52.5) | .234 | 237 (51.2) | 226 (48.8) | .826 |
| Women | 284 (51.9) | 263 (48.1) | 313 (49.2) | 323 (50.8) | ||
| Education (%) | ||||||
| Elementary | 50 (60.2) | 33 (39.7) |
| 68 (62.4) | 41 (37.6) |
|
| High school | 235 (54.2) | 199 (45.9) | 276 (55.3) | 223 (44.7) | ||
| University | 189 (44.0) | 214 (56.1) | 206 (42.0) | 285 (58.0) | ||
| Smoking (%) | ||||||
| Never | 179 (46.4) | 207 (53.6) |
| 213 (46.2) | 248 (53.8) |
|
| Former | 187 (47.0) | 203 (52.1) | 218 (49.2) | 225 (50.8) | ||
| Current | 105 (63.3) | 61 (36.8) | 114 (60.0) | 76 (40.0) | ||
| Alcohol consumption (%) | ||||||
| Never/occasionally | 100 (58.5) | 71 (41.5) | .470 | 144 (67.0) | 71 (33.0) |
|
| Light/moderate | 279 (47.4) | 310 (52.6) | 302 (45.1) | 367 (54.9) | ||
| Heavy | 95 (50.8) | 92 (49.2) | 104 (48.4) | 111 (51.6) | ||
| Depressive symptoms (%) | ||||||
| MADRS ≤ 9 | 442 (48.8) | 464 (51.2) | .138 | 512 (49.0) | 532 (51.0) | .314 |
| MADRS > 9 | 18 (94.7) | 1 (5.3) | 18 (72.0) | 7 (28.0) | ||
| Cognitive function (%) | ||||||
| MMSE ≤ 26 | 17 (68.0) | 8 (32.0) | .594 | 24 (75.0) | 8 (25.0) | .702 |
| MMSE > 26 | 452 (49.7) | 458 (50.3) | 511 (48.9) | 534 (51.1) | ||
| Personality: extraversion (%) | ||||||
| Low | 182 (75.2) | 60 (24.8) |
| 162 (66.9) | 80 (33.1) |
|
| Average | 194 (52.0) | 179 (48.0) | 176 (47.3) | 196 (52.7) | ||
| High | 93 (28.4) | 234 (71.6) | 111 (34.2) | 214 (65.9) | ||
| Personality: neuroticism (%) | ||||||
| Low | 147 (32.6) | 304 (67.4) |
| 181 (40.5) | 266 (59.5) |
|
| Average | 165 (55.7) | 131 (44.3) | 148 (49.8) | 149 (50.2) | ||
| High | 157 (80.5) | 38 (19.5) | 120 (61.5) | 75 (38.5) | ||
| Personality: openness (%) | ||||||
| Low | 164 (59.2) | 113 (40.8) |
| 163 (58.8) | 114 (41.2) |
|
| Average | 144 (52.9) | 128 (47.1) | 125 (46.3) | 145 (53.7) | ||
| High | 161 (41.0) | 232 (59.0) | 161 (41.1) | 231 (58.9) |
Notes: MADRS = Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination. Levels (high/low) of psychological and social well-being according to the median of the distribution. Missing information for the psychological well-being sample: smoking habit = 5; depressive symptoms = 22; cognitive function = 12; personality = 5. Missing information for the social well-being sample: smoking habit = 5; depressive symptoms = 30; cognitive function = 22; personality = 160.
aMultiple logistic regression adjusted for the rest of variables included in the left column of the table.
Figure 1.Mean and 95% confidence interval of baseline walking speed, balance, chair stands, and global physical function score by levels of psychological and social well-being. Note: Levels (high/low) of psychological and social well-being dichotomized according to the median of the distribution.
Association Between Levels of Psychological and Social Well-being and Annual Change in Global Physical Function Score Over the 12-Year Follow-up
| Model I | Model II | Model III | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| |
| Continuous ( | ||||||
| Psychological well-being | .005 (−0.001; 0.011) | .078 | .006 (−0.0004; 0.011) | .069 | .007 (0.0004; 0.013) |
|
| Social well-being | .007 (−0.001; 0.013) | .098 | .006 (−0.001; 0.013) | .093 | .008 (0.0003; 0.016) |
|
| Categorical | ||||||
| Psychological well-being | ||||||
| Low | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High | .008 (0.0002; 0.015) |
| .008 (0.0003; 0.015) |
| .009 (0.001; 0.016) |
|
| Social well-being | ||||||
| Low | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High | .006 (−0.001; 0.013) | .103 | .006 (−0.001; 0.014) | .086 | .007 (−0.001; 0.014) | .084 |
Note: Model I: adjusted by sex, age, education level, and death/dropouts. Model II: adjusted additionally by smoking, alcohol consumption, and presence of one chronic disease. Model III: adjusted additionally by MADRS (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale), MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination), and personality traits. Levels (high/low) of psychological and social well-being dichotomized according to the median of the distribution. Positive coefficients refer to lower decline in the global physical function score compared to the reference group.
Figure 2.Estimated global physical function (z-score) over the 12-year follow-up by levels of psychological and social well-being and sex (including a quadratic function of time in the models). Note: Fully adjusted models. Levels (high/low) of psychological and social well-being dichotomized according to the median of the distribution. Three-way interaction for psychological well-being (high vs low)*follow-up time*sex (female vs male): β = .015; p = .047.
Figure 3.Estimated global physical function (z-score) over the 12-year follow-up by psychosocial profiles (including a quadratic function of time in the models). Note: Levels (high/low) of psychological and social well-being dichotomized according to the median of the distribution. Three-way interaction for psychological well-being (high vs low)*follow-up time*social well-being (high vs low): β = .006; p = .449.