BACKGROUND: The induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) represents a viable strategy for enhancing the activity of radiotherapy. The authors hypothesized that napabucasin would increase ROS via its ability to inhibit NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 and potentiate the response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer via distinct mechanisms. METHOD: Proliferation studies, colony formation assays, and ROS levels were measured in HCT116 and HT29 cell lines treated with napabucasin, chemoradiation, or their combination. DNA damage (pγH2AX), activation of STAT, and downstream angiogenesis were evaluated in both untreated and treated cell lines. Finally, the effects of napabucasin, chemoradiotherapy, and their combination were assessed in vivo with subcutaneous mouse xenograft models. RESULTS: Napabucasin significantly potentiated the growth inhibition of chemoradiation in both cell lines. Napabucasin increased ROS generation. Inhibition of ROS by N-acetylcysteine decreased the growth inhibitory effect of napabucasin alone and in combination with chemoradiotherapy. Napabucasin significantly increased pγH2AX in comparison with chemoradiotherapy alone. Napabucasin reduced the levels of pSTAT3 and VEGF and inhibited angiogenesis through an ROS-mediated effect. Napabucasin significantly potentiated the inhibition of growth and blood vessel formation by chemoradiotherapy in mouse xenografts. CONCLUSION: Napabucasin is a radiosensitizer with a novel mechanism of action: increasing ROS production and inhibiting angiogenesis. Clinical trials testing the addition of napabucasin to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer are needed.
BACKGROUND: The induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) represents a viable strategy for enhancing the activity of radiotherapy. The authors hypothesized that napabucasin would increase ROS via its ability to inhibit NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 and potentiate the response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer via distinct mechanisms. METHOD: Proliferation studies, colony formation assays, and ROS levels were measured in HCT116 and HT29 cell lines treated with napabucasin, chemoradiation, or their combination. DNA damage (pγH2AX), activation of STAT, and downstream angiogenesis were evaluated in both untreated and treated cell lines. Finally, the effects of napabucasin, chemoradiotherapy, and their combination were assessed in vivo with subcutaneous mouse xenograft models. RESULTS:Napabucasin significantly potentiated the growth inhibition of chemoradiation in both cell lines. Napabucasin increased ROS generation. Inhibition of ROS by N-acetylcysteine decreased the growth inhibitory effect of napabucasin alone and in combination with chemoradiotherapy. Napabucasin significantly increased pγH2AX in comparison with chemoradiotherapy alone. Napabucasin reduced the levels of pSTAT3 and VEGF and inhibited angiogenesis through an ROS-mediated effect. Napabucasin significantly potentiated the inhibition of growth and blood vessel formation by chemoradiotherapy in mouse xenografts. CONCLUSION:Napabucasin is a radiosensitizer with a novel mechanism of action: increasing ROS production and inhibiting angiogenesis. Clinical trials testing the addition of napabucasin to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer are needed.
Authors: Balney Rajitha; Astrid Belalcazar; Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju; Walid L Shaib; James P Snyder; Mamoru Shoji; Subasini Pattnaik; Afroz Alam; Bassel F El-Rayes Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Youzhi Li; Harry A Rogoff; Sarah Keates; Yuan Gao; Sylaja Murikipudi; Keith Mikule; David Leggett; Wei Li; Arthur B Pardee; Chiang J Li Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Harry A Rogoff; James D Watson; David A Tuveson; Fieke E M Froeling; Manojit Mosur Swamynathan; Astrid Deschênes; Iok In Christine Chio; Erin Brosnan; Melissa A Yao; Priya Alagesan; Matthew Lucito; Juying Li; An-Yun Chang; Lloyd C Trotman; Pascal Belleau; Youngkyu Park Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Toshifumi Matsuyama; Shawn P Kubli; Steven K Yoshinaga; Klaus Pfeffer; Tak W Mak Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Hannah Flebbe; Melanie Spitzner; Philipp Enno Marquet; Jochen Gaedcke; B Michael Ghadimi; Stefan Rieken; Günter Schneider; Alexander O Koenig; Marian Grade Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Jose Francisco Islas; Adriana G Quiroz-Reyes; Paulina Delgado-Gonzalez; Hector Franco-Villarreal; Juan Luis Delgado-Gallegos; Elsa N Garza-Treviño; Carlos A Gonzalez-Villarreal Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 6.575