While many drugs and metabolites contain nitrogen, harnessing their diagnostic 15N NMR signature for their characterization is underutilized because of inherent detection difficulties. Here, we demonstrate how precise ultralow field signal amplification by reversible exchange (±0.2 mG) in conjunction parahydrogen and an iridium precatalyst of the form IrCl(COD)(NHC) with the coligand d9-benzylamine allows the naturally abundant 15N NMR signatures of pyridine, pyrazine, metronidazole, and acetonitrile to be readily detected at 9.4 T in single NMR observations through >50% 15N polarization levels. These signals allow for rapid and precise reagent quantification via a response that varies linearly over the 2-70 mM concentration range.
While many drugs and metabolites contain nitrogen, harnessing their diagnostic 15N NMR signature for their characterization is underutilized because of inherent detection difficulties. Here, we demonstrate how precise ultralow field signal amplification by reversible exchange (±0.2 mG) in conjunction parahydrogen and an iridium precatalyst of the form IrCl(COD)(NHC) with the coligand d9-benzylamine allows the naturally abundant 15N NMR signatures of pyridine, pyrazine, metronidazole, and acetonitrile to be readily detected at 9.4 T in single NMR observations through >50% 15N polarization levels. These signals allow for rapid and precise reagent quantification via a response that varies linearly over the 2-70 mM concentration range.
Hyperpolarization
methods have been shown to dramatically improve
the sensitivity of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI)[1,2] in a process that involves increasing
the purity of the magnetic states they detect. Signal amplification
by reversible exchange (SABRE) reflects one such method. It harnesses
the nuclear spin order of parahydrogen (p-H2)[3−5] and is a consequence of the pioneering work of Weitekamp[6] and Eisenberg.[7] For
SABRE to operate, the symmetry of p-H2 is first broken by temporarily placing it in a metal complex so
that the new hydride ligands couple distinctly to NMR active spins
within the ligand sphere of the product. A process of reversible binding
then allows a suitable substrate to become hyperpolarized through
a catalytic process that transfers nuclear spin order within the complex
rather than achieving a change in the chemical identity.[3,5] Typically, this process takes place in a specified magnetic field
that is often called the polarization transfer field (PTF) and can
be selected to optimize efficiency.[8,9] The selection
of this field is made according to the chemical shift difference that
exists between the interacting nuclear spins and their spin–spin
couplings[10,11] in a process that has been accurately modeled.[12] As the active SABRE catalyst may break the symmetry
of the two protons that were initially located in p-H2 through chemical or magnetic inequivalence effects,
the process of catalysis can be complex.[5,13] This is because
for the spin order transfer from the p-H2 derived hydride ligands to take place, the receiving ligand nuclei
must exhibit different spin–spin couplings to these two protons.Knowledge of this behavior has influenced the SABRE catalyst design,[14] and the resulting sensitization process has
enabled the easy NMR detection of low-abundance inorganic species.[13] Other studies have used deuterated coligands
to improve the spin-order yields in SABRE by reducing waste through
the focusing of polarization transfer into fewer receptor sites.[15] When this is achieved in conjunction with 2H labeling, the associated extension of the nuclear spin-order
lifetime has proven to be particularly beneficial as decoherence within
the SABRE catalyst reflects one route to reduce the overall processes
efficiency.[16] These two effects combine
to extend the duration, over which signals remain visible to NMR.
As in classical terms, one T1 period is
associated with 63% destruction of the hard-won polarization level.
Not surprisingly, the extended lifetimes associated with molecular
singlet states[17−21] and their derivatives feature extensively in hyperpolarization research
as one goal is often to study in vivo reactivity.[22] In further developments, Tessari et
al. have shown how 1H-SABRE can achieve precise
analyte quantification at low substrate loadings by the involvement
of a slow exchanging coligand.[23,24] Furthermore, Iali et al. extended SABRE to the hyperpolarization of primary
amines through catalysts of the form [Ir(H)2(IMes)(amine)3]Cl,[25] and it was noted that sterically
hindered amines, which failed to bind efficiently, benefited by the
addition of smaller NCMe, which enables the formation of [Ir(H)2(IMes)(aniline)2(NCMe)]Cl.[26] The successful use of amines reflects an important boost to SABRE
because the hyperpolarized NH response can be used to sensitize other
molecules through proton exchange.[25] More
recently developments of this ligand design route have enabled the
hyperpolarization of pyruvate and acetate.[27,28]Normally, although the detection of 15N by NMR
is even
more challenging than that of 1H because of its 0.36% natural
abundance and low magnetogyric ratio, 15N detection is,
however, needed for the characterization of important nucleobases,
nucleosides, nucleotides, peptides, proteins, and transition metal
complexes. In addition, as the T1 of 15N can exceed many minutes, magnetic state lifetimes can approach
those of positron emission tomography.[29−33] It is not, therefore, surprising that 15N hyperpolarization reflected an early target of both spontaneous[3] and radio frequency-driven SABRE.[34] Warren et al. refined these
methods through SABRE SHEATH[35,36] to deliver 20% 15N polarization in metronidazole.[37] Several alternative radio frequency strategies have also been exemplified[38−40] and given the goal of in vivo SABRE, water soluble
SABRE catalysts have also been described[41,42] with the MRI detection of a 15N response illustrated.[42] Here, we seek to demonstrate how amines as coligands
can enable the highly efficient 15N polarization of a range
of target substrates (sub) via SABRE catalysis through
[Ir(H)2(1)(sub)2(BnNH2)]Cl (a) or [Ir(H)2(1)(sub)(BnNH2)2]Cl (b) of Scheme in order to improve the potential of the
SABRE approach to achieve in vivo MRI detection.
Scheme 1
Chemical Structures of Complexes, Substrates, and Ligands
Results
Hyperpolarization of the 15N NMR Signal of Pyridine
We start by considering
nonlabeled pyridine at 35 mM concentration
because of its wide use in early SABRE research[3,4,13] in conjunction with the precatalyst [IrCl(COD)(h22-1)][43] (5 mM) of Scheme . Our experimental measurements involved examining an NMR tube containing
methanol-d4 solutions of these reagents
under 3 bar (absolute) pressure of p-H2 at 99% purity. p-H2 gas is first dissolved
by shaking the NMR tube while it is located in a preset magnetic field
that lies between ±1 mG and ±70 G for ∼10 s (relative
to the main NMR magnetic field orientation). Subsequently, the sample
is placed in a 9.4 T magnet where the final NMR signal detection step
occurs.Under these conditions, the SABRE catalyst [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)3]Cl forms and a 1H NMR signal gain of 1452-fold can be
seen for the ortho proton resonance of free pyridine
that is present in the solution after being transferred from a 60
G field. This polarization transfer step takes 10 s to complete and
the resulting polarization level (PH)
is 4.65% (P reflects
the percentage polarization associated with nuclei x). In this case, the catalyst breaks the symmetry of the two p-H2-derived protons through magnetic inequivalence
effects, and hence, the spin order transfer flows optimally within
the equatorial plane that contains the hydride ligands into bound
pyridine.[44] For 15N, however,
the large trans two bond 1H–15N coupling
of ∼19 Hz[9,35,45,46] that connects these hydride ligands to nitrogen
in [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)3]Cl enables the efficient transfer of polarization
at an approximate −1 mG field that is of the same sense to
the main 9.4 T observation field. The consequence of this process
is a 39200-fold (±2%) 15N NMR signal gain, which means
the corresponding P value
is 12.9% (±2%). Hence, this unlabeled 35 mM sample of pyridine
can be detected by 15N NMR spectroscopy in a single scan
NMR measurement at a magnetic field of 9.4 T with a signal to noise
ratio of 11 using a routine inverse detection probe.
Establishment
of Coligand Benzylamine As Beneficial to the Hyperpolarization
of the 15N NMR Signal of Pyridine
When the coligand d7-benzylamine (d7-BnNH2) was added to such a sample, at an initial concentration
of 17.5 mM, it proved to rapidly convert into its d9-benzylamine isotopologue. Consequently, we refer to d9-BnND2 throughout this article even
though d7-BnNH2 is actually
added to the samples. The resulting 1H NMR spectra reveal
that in addition to this labeling change, two new inorganic species
are formed, which yield pairs of hydride ligand signals at δ
−22.14 and −22.58, and δ −23.34 and −23.73,
respectively. These hydride ligand signals arise from [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(d9-BnND2)(py)2]Cl and [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(d9-BnND2)2(py)]Cl, respectively,
that are present in the solution in the ratio 2.6:1. The two complexes
contain inequivalent hydride ligands that differ from one another
according to the identity of the axial ligands in the complex, as
detailed in Scheme and the Supporting Information. Furthermore,
as their proportions match the value seen when a similar sample is
created by the initial addition of benzylamine and H2 to
[IrCl(COD)(h22-1)], but before
pyridine addition takes place, it can be concluded that these two
complexes are in equilibrium. Hence, the separation of their roles
in the underlying SABRE process is impractical, but we note it would
be expected that both will contribute to this process. In addition,
it is important to recognize that both of these complexes contain
chemically and magnetically distinct hydride ligands. The result of
this change is that spin-order transfer can now proceed into ligands
that lie trans and cis to hydride, which means that spin dilution,
associated with polarization of the axial ligands, is expected and
this will reduce the SABRE signal gains that are seen for the free
substrate.[44] Hence, the involvement of
polarization transfer protecting d9-BnND2, which limits spin-order wastage should be of significant
benefit to the SABRE outcome.When the resulting d9-BnND2 solutions were examined for SABRE,
the 1H NMR response resulting from this mixture of catalysts
proved to contain a free pyridine ortho proton resonance
that was 880-fold (±50) larger than expected after being transferred
from a 60 G field. As this gain is smaller than the value achieved
by [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)3]Cl we can conclude that under these conditions
the [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(d9-BnND2)(py)2]Cl/[Ir(H)2(h22-1)(d9-BnND2)2(py)]Cl
mixture is actually less efficient at hyperpolarizing the 1H NMR signals of pyridine than [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)3]Cl. More notable is
the fact that the corresponding 15N NMR spectrum contains
a signal that is indicative of a P value of 18% (53,300 ± 6000-fold) in conjunction with
a PTF of approximately −1 mG (Figure a). This reflects a 27% improvement in the
SABRE efficiency when compared to that achieved by [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)3]Cl
and confirms that there is a benefit to using the coligand d9-benzylamine when seeking 15N polarization.
Figure 1
Polarized 15N NMR signals of (a) pyridine, (b) acetonitrile,
(c, d) pyrazine, and (e) metronidazole. Levels indicted in figure
alongside agent. In (d), the series of 15N NMR signals
for pyrazine vary in intensity according to the magnitude of the PTF.
(f) Shake time dependence of the P level in metronidazole with [IrCl(d34-4)(COD)]. (g) P level for metronidazole (black) and pyrazine (red) in a 10
mm sample tube as a function of PTF magnitude.
Polarized 15N NMR signals of (a) pyridine, (b) acetonitrile,
(c, d) pyrazine, and (e) metronidazole. Levels indicted in figure
alongside agent. In (d), the series of 15N NMR signals
for pyrazine vary in intensity according to the magnitude of the PTF.
(f) Shake time dependence of the P level in metronidazole with [IrCl(d34-4)(COD)]. (g) P level for metronidazole (black) and pyrazine (red) in a 10
mm sample tube as a function of PTF magnitude.Upon changing to [IrCl(d22-1)(COD)], and completing a similar series of d9-BnND2 promoted measurements, the levels of signal
gain seen in the pyridine ortho proton 1H NMR signal rises to 1324-fold, although the 15N polarization
level proved to be unaffected. Hence, while catalyst deuteration is
not successful at improving SABRE 15N activity, it is able
to improve the level of 1H signal gain because of reduced
spin order wastage and improved 1H relaxation.[16] This suggests that low-field 15N-relaxation
within the catalyst is not improved.While it is well known
that the optimum SABRE catalyst changes
with the identity of the substrate, it has been clearly demonstrated
here that there is also a further dependence on the efficiency of
SABRE transfer within a given substrate according to whether 1H or 15N is the target. The optimum rate of ligand
exchange for 1H transfer has been proposed by Barskiy to
be 4.5 s–1 in complexes of the type [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)3]Cl.
Consequently, the rate of pyridine substrate dissociation in [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)2(d9-BnND2)]Cl in methanol-d4 solution was determined using the EXSY method
and found to be 0.06 s–1 at 268 K. This value increases
to 1.04 s–1 upon warming at 298 K, and 2.1 s–1 at 308 K. Our associated SABRE measurements reveal
that the corresponding 1H NMR signal gains change from
600-fold, through 4530-fold to 3550-fold at the 308 K setting. Hence,
it appears that a rate closer to 1.04 s–1 is optimal
for 1H transfer into pyridine using this catalyst. Our
experiments also reveal that there is a 30% growth in efficiency of 15N polarization for pyridine on moving from 268 to 298 K,
and a further 22% improvement on moving to 308 from 298 K. Consequently,
we can confirm that the two different nuclei are best served with
different rates of ligand exchange.
Hyperpolarization of the 15N NMR Signal of Acetonitrile
In order to develop
this method further, acetonitrile was tested
at a similar 35 mM concentration in conjunction with the SABRE catalyst
[Ir(H)2(h22-1)(NCMe)3]Cl. This catalyst also relies on magnetic inequivalence to
break the symmetry of the hydride ligands and it yields a 1H NMR signal gain of just 83-fold per methyl proton in the unbound
acetonitrile present in the solution after transfer at 298 K from
a 70 G field. The SABRE-derived 15N NMR signal gain for
CH3CN was found to be far more substantial, at 41,800 ±
6000-fold (14% polarization) after transfer from an approximate −1
mG field.Acetonitrile hyperpolarization was then studied in
conjunction with 3.6 equivalents of the coligand d9-benzylamine relative to 5.2 mM iridium concentration.
Both [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)2(NCMe)(h22-1)]Cl and [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)3(h22-1)]Cl form in these experiments, in a 2:1 ratio. They both possess
chemically distinct hydride ligands. The resulting 1H NMR
response after SABRE showed an improved 1H NMR signal gain
of 160-fold per proton for CH3CN while its 15N polarization level rose to 19% (Figure b).For the corresponding 2H labeled precatalyst [IrCl(d22-1)(COD)], the 1H
NMR signal again improves further to 367-fold per proton in accordance
with reduced spin dilution that arises as a consequence of hydride
ligand chemical inequivalence in [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)2(NCMe)(h22-1)]Cl and [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)3(h22-1)]Cl, but now the achieved P level fell to 10%. Hence, 2H-catalyst
labeling of the NHC ligand is now detrimental to the 15N polarization level. In this case, the appreciable concentration
of [Ir(H)2(d9-BnNH2)2(NCMe)(d22-1)]Cl, where there will be coupling between the 2H labels
of the NHC and the 15N of NCMe, could result in a reduction
in 15N-SABRE efficiency. Barskiy’s observations
that in micro-tesla transfer fields, scaler relaxation of the second
kind[47] associated with the quadrupolar 14N–13C interaction limits the level of 13C polarization under SABRE support this view.[48] The gain in the 1H signal intensity
relative to the situation with h22-1 is, however, consistent with a reduction in the polarization
transfer into this ligand through deuteration and an extension of
the hydride ligand relaxation times.[14]
Hyperpolarization of the 15N NMR Signal of Pyrazine
We next consider pyrazine (pz). This substrate was tested by taking
5.2 mM methanol-d4 solutions of [IrCl(COD)(h22-1)] that contained a sevenfold
excess of pz under 3 bar of p-H2. The
resulting 1H NMR signal gain for pz was now 900-fold per
proton (2.9% polarization) and a P value of 16% (±2, per nitrogen used throughout) was
observed after the transfer from −3 mG.Studies with
added h7-BnND2 resulted in
a 1H NMR signal gain of 566-fold (0.8%) and a 15N signal gain of 12% due to the associated spin dilution effects.
However, when d9-BnND2 and h22-1 were used with a PTF of 60 G, radiation
damping resulted with 1H signal detection. In order to
aid the analysis, this artifact could be suppressed if a less efficient
PTF of 120 G was used. Analysis under these conditions was used to
deduce that the corresponding PH level
is 13.5% (±0.6) per proton for a 60 G measurement while for 15N it was 38% (per nitrogen). The 1H NMR signal
gain grew further to 30.9% (±0.7) when [IrCl(d22-1)(COD)] was used, but the corresponding 15N signal response fell in intensity meaning that the scaler
relaxation of the second kind is again important. We also tested the
related SIMes containing precatalyst [IrCl(COD)(2)][49] with pyrazine and discovered that a P value of 15.8% could be achieved
without a coligand. Samples containing both the d7-benzylamine and pyrazine yield [Ir(H)2(pz)2(d9-BnND2)(h22-2)]Cl and [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)2(pz)(h22-2)]Cl in the ratio 2:1 and a P value of 44.2% via PTF from an approximate −1.9 mG field (Figure c). This falls to 31.8% with d22-SIMes in agreement with a role for 2H-drive
relation in the SABRE catalyst at low field. Figure d shows that the sign of the PTF, relative
to that of the main observation field, affects the measured 15N pz signal gains. This is because upon moving the sample slowly
between the points of polarization transfer and measurement, if it
experiences a zero-field point, there is a loss in the spin order
due to relaxation at this point.The rate of pyrazine dissociation
from [Ir(H)2(pz)2(d9-BnND2)(h22-2)]Cl was determined using the
EXSY method to be 0.33 s–1 at 268 K when the 1H NMR signal gain is 660-fold. This rate increases to 1.8
s–1 at 298 K where the 1H signal gain
is 2200-fold. Our experiments reveal that the 20% growth in the efficiency
of 15N polarization on moving from 268 to 298 K for pyrazine
is a consequence of this rate increase, which is faster than that
of pyridine loss in the related complex [Ir(H)2(h22-1)(py)2(d9-BnND2)]Cl. This kinetic difference is consistent
with the relative 15N polarization efficiencies of 44.2
and 18%, respectively.
Hyperpolarization of the 15N NMR
Signal of Metronidazole
Biologically significant metronidazole[50,51] has been well-studied by Chekmenev et al.(52−55) We conducted control measurements for 5.2 mM methanol-d4 solutions of [IrCl(COD)(h22-1)] and [IrCl(COD)(h22-2)] with a sevenfold excess of metronidazole relative to iridium
and a 3 bar pressure of p-H2 but failed
to see significant polarization in either samples. However, once a
3.6-fold excess of d7-benzylamine was
added, polarization transfer to proton and 15N was readily
seen with both precursors. For [IrCl(COD)(h22-1)], the P value was 22% while for [IrCl(COD)(h22-2)], it was 24% (transfer at −2 mG and 2% P seen for d7-benzylamine itself). When the 2H labeled versions
of these catalysts, [IrCl(COD)(d22-1)] or [IrCl(COD)(d22-2)], were used, these P values
rose to 27%. In all cases, the reaction with d9-benzylamine and metronidazole formed [Ir(H)2(mtz)2(d9-BnND2)(NHC)]Cl
and [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)2(mtz)(NHC)]Cl with the ratio being 1.4:1 for d22-2.Data were now collected
on the d22-2 system to demonstrate
that the PTF value can be used to control which of the two substrates
present in solution receives polarization. This effect serves to illustrate
how selectivity can be introduced into the analysis of mixtures if
peak overlap is an issue (see the Supporting Information). Furthermore, a catalyst change to [IrCl(COD)(d34-4)] increased the N1 value
to 51% for metronidazole with 4% polarization being achieved on N2 and 1% on d9-benzylamine (Table ).
Table 1
Absolute Value of 1H (Total
Proton) and 15N NMR (per Site) Signal Enhancement Levels
for Pyrazine and Metronidazole at the Specified PTF for Samples with d9-Benzylamine as a Coligand
signal
gain (P)
nucleus (PTF)
1
d22-1
2
d22-2
3
d16-3
4
d34-4
error, %, ±
pyrazine
1H (120 G)/fold
1372
3151
2220
6028
2533
558
556
673
4
15N (%, as indicated PTF mG)
38 (−3)
35
(−3)
44 (−1.9)
37 (−5)
26 (−2)
31 (−4)
32 (−5)
28 (−3)
2
metronidazole-N1
1H (60 G)/fold
326
474
560
446
814
1038
676
856
5
15N (%, at PTF of −2 mG)
22
27
24
27
23
23
32
51
3
The rates of metronidazole
dissociation from the resulting complex
[Ir(H)2(mtz)2(d9-BnND2)(d34-4)]Cl were determined in methanol-d4 solution
at 268, 298, and 308 K by the EXSY method as being 0.80, 2.37, and
5.5 s–1, respectively. For the 1H signal
gain, 298 K proved to be the best, yielding an enhancement of 856-fold.
We now see an 80% growth in the efficiency of 15N polarization
on moving from 268 to 298 K, but the P values falls to just 18% at 308 K. Hence, increasing the
ligand exchange rate beyond 2.4 s–1 seems detrimental.
Usage of Higher Proportions of p-H2 to
Improve the NMR Signal Gain
A series of measurements
were then completed on metronidazole using a 10 mm NMR tube to deploy
a larger excess of p-H2 in conjunction
with [IrCl(COD)(d34-4)] and d9-benzylamine. A slight increase in the 15N polarization level to 54% results alongside a reduction
in response variability to 2%. Consequently, as shown in Figure g, a −3.6
mG PTF can be deduced as being optimal. Similar 10 mm measurements
were then made for pyridine with [IrCl(COD)(h22-1), acetonitrile with [IrCl(COD)(h22-1), and pyrazine with [IrCl(COD)(h22-2) in the presence of d9-benzylamine. These studies saw the P level for pyridine increase to
48% at 4 bar p-H2 pressure. When acetonitrile
was examined, a 30.7% P level
was reached, but for pyrazine it became 59.4% per nitrogen. Further
increases in the pyrazine % P level can be achieved through reagent dilution such that when an
initial 5 mM solution of [IrCl(COD)(h22-2)] with a 3.6-fold excess of d9-benzylamine and sevenfold excess of pyrazine based on iridium
is diluted 10 fold, the P value increases to 79%; the S/N ratio in this case is 11.3. In this
case, the effect is directly analogous to increasing the volume of p-H2 available.
Quantification of Reagent
Concentrations at the mM Level through
a SABRE-Enhanced 15N Signal
Once we had ascertained
how to achieve these polarization levels, we tested how the magnitude
of the pyridine, pyrazine, and metronidazole response varied as a
function of substrate concentrations between 2.2 and 70 mM. These
solutions were made up by simply diluting a stock solution with an
initial catalyst, d7-benzylamine, and
substrate concentration of 10, 36, and 70 mM, respectively. We discovered
that there was a linear variation in the signal response in each case,
as shown in Figure .
Figure 2
Raw signal intensity resulting from a series of hyperpolarized 15N NMR spectra of pyridine, metronidazole, and pyrazine as
a function of their concentration. The PTF was optimized for each
substrate. The stock solution of the sample ([Ir] = 6.5 mM, substrate
= 70 mM, and 22.7 mM d9-BnND2) was diluted during these measurements, from 70 mM substrate to
2.2 mM substrate concentration. The straight lines result from linear
regression analysis and the square of the sample correlation coefficient—R2-confirms linear behavior.
Raw signal intensity resulting from a series of hyperpolarized 15N NMR spectra of pyridine, metronidazole, and pyrazine as
a function of their concentration. The PTF was optimized for each
substrate. The stock solution of the sample ([Ir] = 6.5 mM, substrate
= 70 mM, and 22.7 mM d9-BnND2) was diluted during these measurements, from 70 mM substrate to
2.2 mM substrate concentration. The straight lines result from linear
regression analysis and the square of the sample correlation coefficient—R2-confirms linear behavior.In the second series of studies, we maintained a constant iridium
and coligand concentration while changing the pyrazine concentration.
A linear change in the 15N signal intensity was again observed
(Figure ) despite,
in this case, observing some changes in the catalyst form. The hydride
region of the polarized NMR spectra confirm that both [Ir(H)2(pz)(d9-BnND2)2(h22-2)]Cl (A) and [Ir(H)2(pz)2(d9-BnND2)(h22-2)]Cl (B) of Figure form, with the former being favored at low pyrazine
loadings. As the concentration of pyrazine decreases, the amount of
the formed complex B decreases, and as a result of it,
the 15N polarization of pyrazine linearly decreases as
well. This suggests that the main SABRE—15N catalyst
is the type B complex. We are currently exploring this
behavior in more detail. These data, therefore, confirm that substrate
detection and quantification is feasible via a 15N SABRE signal (see the Supporting Information).
Figure 3
Raw signal intensity resulting from a series of hyperpolarized 15N NMR spectra of pyrazine as a function of its concentration.
The PTF used was −1.9 mG. The concentration of the [Ir]-precatalyst
([IrCl(COD)(h22-2)]) was
kept constant at 6.5 mM. 3.6 equivalents of d9-BnND2 were added relative to the metal. Subsequently,
the concentration of added pyrazine was varied from 8.2 to 70 mM.
Straight line behavior results thereby confirmed that the absolution
concentration of pyrazine can be estimated from such data.
Figure 4
Effect of pyrazine loading on catalyst speciation when methanol-d4 solutions of [IrCl(COD)(h22-2)] are examine with d9-BnND2 and pyrazine in the presence of p-H2 seen through the hydride region of the corresponding 1H NMR spectra. Left, thermally equilibrated NMR spectra and
right, initial SABRE-enhanced NMR spectra. Species A and B are defined in the text while C is Ir(H)2(Cl)(d9-BnND2)(pz)(h22-2) and D [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)(methanol-d4)(h22-2)]Cl.
Raw signal intensity resulting from a series of hyperpolarized 15N NMR spectra of pyrazine as a function of its concentration.
The PTF used was −1.9 mG. The concentration of the [Ir]-precatalyst
([IrCl(COD)(h22-2)]) was
kept constant at 6.5 mM. 3.6 equivalents of d9-BnND2 were added relative to the metal. Subsequently,
the concentration of added pyrazine was varied from 8.2 to 70 mM.
Straight line behavior results thereby confirmed that the absolution
concentration of pyrazine can be estimated from such data.Effect of pyrazine loading on catalyst speciation when methanol-d4 solutions of [IrCl(COD)(h22-2)] are examine with d9-BnND2 and pyrazine in the presence of p-H2 seen through the hydride region of the corresponding 1H NMR spectra. Left, thermally equilibrated NMR spectra and
right, initial SABRE-enhanced NMR spectra. Species A and B are defined in the text while C is Ir(H)2(Cl)(d9-BnND2)(pz)(h22-2) and D [Ir(H)2(d9-BnND2)(methanol-d4)(h22-2)]Cl.
Conclusions
We
have described here how the addition of the coligand d9-benzylamine to a precatalyst based on [IrCl(NHC)(COD)]
under p-H2 results in very high levels
of 15N polarization in a range of substrates. The high
field measurements were made in conjunction with the simple shake
and drop approach, and it takes approximately 17 s to complete a measurement.
In the case of the substrates pyridine and acetonitrile, [IrCl(h22-1)(COD)] led to P values of 48 and 30.9%, respectively, after
being transferred from an appropriate mG field. In contrast, a 59.4 P value for pyrazine was achieved
using the precatalyst [IrCl(h22-2)(COD)]. These reactions involve the formation of a range
of SABRE catalysts of the form [Ir(H)2(sub)2(d9-BnND2)(NHC)]Cl and [Ir(H)2(sub)(d9-BnND2)2(NHC)]Cl, which are in equilibrium.Previous studies
have established that using deuterated NHC ligands
(d22-1 and d22-2) improve SABRE hyperpolarization transfer
efficiency into methylnicotinate. This improvement is based on an
extension of the hydride ligand relaxation times.[14] Studies here confirm that higher P values result in all cases in support of this
benefit. However, deuteration is not beneficial for the 15N transfer in pyridine, pyrazine, and acetonitrile. Barskiy’s
observations that in micro-tesla transfer fields, scaler relaxation
of the second kind[47] associated with the
quadrupolar 14N–13C interaction limits
the level of 13C polarization under SABRE offer a route
to explain this view.[48] For metronidazole,
however, an improved value of 54% on N1 results with d9-benzylamine and [IrCl(COD)(d34-4)], compared to that seen with precatalyst
[IrCl(COD)(h34-4)]. Hence, 2H labeling of the catalyst can also be of significant benefit
to P.The rates of
ligand exchange were also assessed alongside the collection
of variable temperature SABRE data. It was found that the rate of
optimum ligand exchange could slower than that found for 1H transfer, despite the larger 1H–15N transfer coupling. We are currently exploring this behavior in
more detail.Data were also presented that was collected from
larger 10 mm NMR
tubes using a 4 bar pressure of p-H2.
This acted to increase the relative excess of the hyperpolarization
fuel p-H2 relative to the substrate and
proved to result in greatly improved response reproducibility. Consequently,
results demonstrated that a PTF precision of ±0.2 mG is needed
for optimal 15N transfer. In addition, ∼50% 15N polarization levels could now be achieved in pyrazine,
pyridine, or metronidazole, which makes them all highly detectable
even at low concentrations.In order to demonstrate an analytical
use for these 15N signals, results were presented to demonstrate
that the magnitude
of the resulting NMR response scales linearly with concentration over
the range 2.2–70 mM. This means that such SABRE-derived data
can be used to quantify their amount in the solution when set against
a suitable reference trace. Tessari have completed a growing range
of studies, which demonstrate that 1H detection levels
can be linked to both speciation and quantity,[23,24] while we have described how 13C signals in glucose can
be linked to amount.[56] These studies employed
a methylated triazol coligand to simplify the exchange kinetics in
order to produce the necessary linear response. We were unable to
benchmark our data with that of the triazol coligand as it is not
commercially available. We did, however, test d6-DMSO, which is finding widespread use as a coligand for the
sensitization of weakly binding substrates as an alternative. As detailed
in the Supporting Information, the corresponding
SABRE performance was degraded.It is therefore clear that SABRE
offers a simple and yet efficient
route to analyte quantification by 15N NMR spectroscopy.
Not surprisingly, we predict these results will, therefore, be of
benefit if you wish to use 15N NMR as a characterization
tool, or simply to quantify precise, and yet low, levels of nitrogen-containing
drugs that are present in solution or to collect 15N-MRI
data.
Authors: Richard A Green; Ralph W Adams; Simon B Duckett; Ryan E Mewis; David C Williamson; Gary G R Green Journal: Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 9.795
Authors: Bryce E Kidd; Jonathan L Gesiorski; Max E Gemeinhardt; Roman V Shchepin; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Peter J Rayner; Michael J Burns; Alexandra M Olaru; Philip Norcott; Marianna Fekete; Gary G R Green; Louise A R Highton; Ryan E Mewis; Simon B Duckett Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alexandra Svyatova; Ivan V Skovpin; Nikita V Chukanov; Kirill V Kovtunov; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Andrey N Pravdivtsev; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Igor V Koptyug Journal: Chemistry Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Gabriele Stevanato; Joseph T Hill-Cousins; Pär Håkansson; Soumya Singha Roy; Lynda J Brown; Richard C D Brown; Giuseppe Pileio; Malcolm H Levitt Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Danila A Barskiy; Roman V Shchepin; Aaron M Coffey; Thomas Theis; Warren S Warren; Boyd M Goodson; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Thomas Theis; Gerardo X Ortiz; Angus W J Logan; Kevin E Claytor; Yesu Feng; William P Huhn; Volker Blum; Steven J Malcolmson; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Qiu Wang; Warren S Warren Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Wissam Iali; Peter J Rayner; Adel Alshehri; A Jonathan Holmes; Amy J Ruddlesden; Simon B Duckett Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Marianna Fekete; Oliver W Bayfield; Oliver Bayfield; Simon B Duckett; Sam Hart; Ryan E Mewis; Natalie Pridmore; Peter J Rayner; Adrian Whitwood Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Nikita V Chukanov; Oleg G Salnikov; Ivan A Trofimov; Mohammad S H Kabir; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Benjamin Chapman; Baptiste Joalland; Collier Meersman; Jessica Ettedgui; Rolf E Swenson; Murali C Krishna; Panayiotis Nikolaou; Kirill V Kovtunov; Oleg G Salnikov; Igor V Koptyug; Max E Gemeinhardt; Boyd M Goodson; Roman V Shchepin; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 8.008
Authors: Nikita V Chukanov; Roman V Shchepin; Sameer M Joshi; Mohammad S H Kabir; Oleg G Salnikov; Alexandra Svyatova; Igor V Koptyug; Juri G Gelovani; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Chemistry Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 5.020