Literature DB >> 32383191

Cost of illness study for adult atopic dermatitis in Japan: A cross-sectional Web-based survey.

Hiroyuki Murota1, Sachie Inoue2, Kazufumi Yoshida3, Atsushi Ishimoto3.   

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis is a pruritic, eczematous dermatitis, the symptoms of which chronically fluctuate with remissions and relapses. Although a high psychosomatic and economic burden caused by atopic dermatitis is expected, few studies have been conducted estimating the cost of illness, including the self-medication costs and productivity loss due to atopic dermatitis. The aim of this study was to conduct a cross-sectional, Web-based survey of the direct medical costs, self-medication costs and productivity loss for adult atopic dermatitis patients, and estimate the burden of Japanese adult atopic dermatitis patients by disease severity. In a physician survey, the medical resource consumption related to medical treatments was surveyed by disease severity. The direct medical costs were calculated by multiplying the medical resource consumption and medical fee corresponding to each treatment. Based on the results of a patient survey, the self-medication costs and productivity loss were estimated by sex and disease severity. Atopic dermatitis-related productivity loss was calculated based on absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work impairment for employed workers and activity impairment for housewives. The nationwide estimations were calculated based on the estimated number of atopic dermatitis patients, employed workers with atopic dermatitis, and housewives with atopic dermatitis in their 20s-50s in Japan. Based on the surveys, all costs per patient and the scores increased with disease severity. The cost of illness for adult atopic dermatitis patients in Japan was estimated to be approximately JPY 3 trillion/year. Considering the physical and mental burdens, the burden of illness for adult atopic dermatitis was demonstrated to be vast.
© 2020 Japan Tobacco Inc. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atopic dermatitis; cost of illness; direct medical cost; overall work impairment; self-medication cost

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32383191      PMCID: PMC7384180          DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatol        ISSN: 0385-2407            Impact factor:   4.005


Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by recurring exacerbations of red, dry and itchy skin. The prevalence of adult AD was reported to range 2.1–4.9% in an international, cross‐sectional, Web‐based survey on the prevalence of adult AD (18–65 years old), which was conducted in the USA, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK and Japan between 29 February and 13 April 2016. Kohno et al. surveyed 4826 Japanese adults in their 20s–60s between 2000 and 2008, and reported the prevalence of Japanese adult AD to be 6.8%, and that it was slightly lower in males than females and decreased with age. The distribution of adults with mild, moderate, severe and most severe AD was 80.1%, 17.7%, 1.5% and 0.6%, respectively, and mild cases accounted for 80%. Atopic dermatitis often affects everyday life, and it commonly requires regular treatments to repair the skin barrier using moisturizers and topical anti‐inflammatory management by using corticosteroids to control inflammation. , In addition, there are out‐of‐pocket expenses for self‐medication such as moisturizing creams, hygiene products and laundry costs. Furthermore, the AD condition also reduces the health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) due to itching, appearance problems and treatment burden for AD. Poole et al. reported that the quality of life (QOL) score decreased with disease severity in a HRQoL study using EuroQol 5 Dimension and Short Form 6 Dimension for AD patients. A HRQoL survey using time trade‐off conducted in Germany revealed that the QOL score of patients with uncontrolled AD was lower than that of those with controlled AD, being 0.65 and 0.96, respectively. Furthermore, 62.2% of AD patients have sleep disorders, and AD is expected to cause a high psychosomatic and economic burden. Several studies have evaluated the economic burden of AD. Kim et al. surveyed 34 AD patients who visited dermatologists at three universities in Korea between 1 June 2010 and 31 August 2010. They found that the annual total direct medical cost for AD patients was KRW 457 038, and the absenteeism for their families and guardians due to informal caregiving was an average of 4.5 days/year. A survey was conducted by Fowler et al. using claims data of 13 749 patients diagnosed with AD between 1 January 1998 and 31 January 2005. The increase in direct and indirect medical costs in the AD patient group aged 0–64 years compared with those in control group was USD 88/month and USD 64/month, respectively. Barbeau et al. reported that the absenteeism per visit for 76 AD patients was 1.1 h, and it increased with severity. Holm et al. also reported that the absenteeism of AD patients for the past 6 months was an average of 5.8 days. However, in Japan, although the health‐care resource use and disease burden related to AD treatment in AD patients have been reported, few studies have estimated the cost of illness, including the self‐medication costs and productivity loss due to AD. The aim of this study was to conduct a cross‐sectional, Web‐based survey on the direct medical costs, self‐medication costs and productivity loss for adult AD patients (aged ≥16 years) and estimate the burden of Japanese adult AD patients by disease severity.

Methods

Study design and participants

Direct medical costs, self‐medication costs and productivity loss were estimated as the burden of AD. A cross‐sectional, Web‐based survey was performed. Participants were 100 Japanese physicians registered with M3 who regularly treat AD patients for the direct medical costs, and 400 Japanese AD patients aged 16–59 years registered with Rakuten Insight were surveyed for self‐medication costs and productivity loss (male : female, 1:1; mild : moderate : severe : most severe, 1:1:1:1). The survey period of the physician and patient surveys was 25–28 March 2019 and 25–27 April 2018, respectively.

Direct medical costs

The direct medical cost was assessed using the prevalence method, a widely used cost of illness approach. The medical resource consumption related to the following medical treatments was surveyed between inpatients and outpatients: prescriptions of topical and oral medicines and injections; prescription rate; dose and dosing period; rate and frequency of ultraviolet therapy/photochemotherapy and each test; frequency of outpatient visits; and frequency and length of hospitalization. The annual direct medical cost was estimated by multiplying the medical resource consumption and medical fee corresponding to each treatment. The medical resource consumption was surveyed by AD severity and calculated by the following four states: state A (no symptoms, minimal symptoms), state B (only mild rash regardless of area), state C (marked inflammatory rash covering <10% of the body surface area) and state D (severe inflammatory rash covering ≥10% and <30% of the body surface area, or intense inflammatory rash covering ≥30% of the body surface area). The distributions of the calculated direct medical costs were confirmed, and the respondents whose total cost was within the top 5% in each state were excluded as outliers.

Self‐medication costs and productivity loss

The self‐medication costs and productivity loss were estimated by sex and severity (mild/moderate/severe/most severe). For the self‐medication costs, the participants responded for each severity defined as follows: mild, state with skin that dries out with no marked change in the skin color or condition, or reddish skin that dries out; moderate, state with remaining scratch marks or solidified swelling on the skin due to worsening of drying, redness and roughness; severe, state with worsened symptoms covering approximately 10% of all skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling; and most severe, state with worsened symptoms covering more than 10% of all skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling. As self‐medication costs, the annual cost was calculated by investigating the approximate payment per month for the following items purchased due to AD: foods (including drinks); over the counter (OTC) drugs and supplements; cosmetics; body cleaning agents, such as soap, shampoo and body soap; clothes; bedding; and other. AD‐related productivity loss was estimated following the human capital approach and evaluated using the work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI)/AD. The productivity loss of employed workers was calculated based on absenteeism (%), presenteeism (%) and overall work impairment (OWI) (%). The productivity loss of housewives was calculated based on activity impairment (AI) (%). The annual productivity loss was estimated from each score, and the annual wage by corresponding occupational information on each patient based on age and sex (Wage Census). The productivity loss of housewives was also estimated by multiplying the AI score and its compensation (estimated monetary value of unpaid work [published in June 2013]) .

Nationwide estimation

The number of nationwide AD patients was calculated as 4.262 million people (males, 1.696 million; females, 2.566 million) by multiplying the total population in their 20s–50s (20–59 years) in 2018, 61.96 million people (males, 31.41 million; females, 30.55 million) by the prevalence of AD patients (males, 5.4%; females, 8.4%).

Direct medical costs

The nationwide direct medical cost was estimated by multiplying the number of AD patients of each severity and the estimated annual direct medical costs for each severity. The number of AD patients was calculated by weighting the estimated number of AD patients by the severity distribution. It was 3.417 million for mild, 0.755 million for moderate, 64 000 for severe and 26 000 people for most severe. The severity distribution used in the calculation was adjusted by the sum of the distribution to be 100% because the total of the reported values by Kohno et al. was 99.9%. The average cost of state A and state B was assigned for the direct medical costs for mild cases, the medical cost of state C for moderate cases, and the medical cost of state D for all severe and most severe cases.

Self‐medication costs

Based on the assumption that the severity distributions were the same regardless of sex, the nationwide self‐medication cost was estimated by multiplying the number of AD patients of each sex and severity with the estimated annual self‐medication costs for each sex and severity. The number of AD patients of each sex and severity was calculated by weighting the number of AD patients for males and females (males, 1.696 million; female, 2.566 million) by the severity distribution.

Productivity loss

Productivity loss for OWI

The nationwide productivity loss for OWI was estimated based on the number of employed workers with AD by sex (males, 1.527 million; females, 1.94 million). It was calculated by multiplying the number of employed workers in the same age group (20s–50s) in 2018 (51.37 million people) with the prevalence of AD. Assuming that the severity distributions were the same regardless of sex, it was estimated by multiplying the number of employed workers with AD of each sex and severity with the annual productivity loss for OWI for each sex and severity. The number of employed workers with AD was weighted by the severity distribution, and the annual productivity loss was weighted by the proportion of regular or non‐regular workers: where indicates the number of employed workers aged 20–59 in sex of i; , prevalence of AD in sex of i (%); OWI, overall work impairment in sex of i (%); IN, annual income in sex of i (JPY/year)*; OWI , , , overall work impairment of working status of k in sex and severity of i, j (%); , proportion of working status of k in sex of i (%); , proportion of severity of j (%); IN , , , annual income of working status of k in sex and age group of i, l (JPY/year); , proportion of working status of k in sex and age group of i, l (%); I, sex (1, male; 2, female); j, 4 severity grades (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, most severe); k, working status (1, regular; 2, non‐regular); and l, 8 age groups divided into 5 years from 20–59 years old.

Productivity loss for AI

The nationwide productivity loss for AI was estimated based on the number of housewives with AD of 499 000 people, which was calculated by multiplying the number of housewives (5.943 million people) with the prevalence of AD. The number of housewives with AD was calculated by multiplying the female population in the same age group (20s–50s) in 2018, the percentage of houseworkers in females and the prevalence of AD. The productivity loss of housewives was estimated by multiplying the number of housewives with AD of each severity and the estimated annual productivity loss for AI for each severity. The number of housewives with AD of each severity was weighted by the severity distribution: where N HW indicates the number of housewives aged 20–59; , prevalence of AD in females (%); AI, activity impairment (%); UW, value of unpaid work by unemployed female spouse (JPY/year); N 2, : the number of females in age group of l; , percentage of houseworkers in females in age group of l (%); AI, activity impairment at severity of j (%); , proportion of severity of j (%); UW, value of unpaid work by unemployed female spouse in age group of l (%); j, 4 severity grades (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, most severe); and l, 8 age groups divided into 5 years from 20–59 years old.

Results

Sample characteristics

The characteristics of the 100 physicians enrolled in the Web‐based survey of the direct medical cost are summarized in Table 1. Approximately half of the responding physicians worked at clinics (bedless medical facilities), and regularly treated approximately 90 cases of adult AD per month. The number of physicians who answered that they treat patients in each state, namely who answered questions related to the cost of each state, was 74 for state A, 99 for states B and C, and 89 for state D.
Table 1

Characteristics of physicians (n = 100) who participated in the physician survey (direct medical cost)

ItemValue
Specialty
General internal medicine8
Dermatology80
Pediatrics12
Other0
No. of beds in the medical facility
≥40030
200–39914
100–1996
20–991
1–192
0 (bedless)47
No. of AD patients aged ≥16 years (/month)88 ± 42
No. of physicians who treat patients at states A through D
State A74
State B99
State C99
State D89

Mean ± standard deviation. ‡Each state was defined as follows: state A, minimal symptoms; state B, only mild rash regardless of area; state C, marked inflammatory rash covering <10% of the body surface area; and state D, severe inflammatory rash covering ≥10% but <30% of the body surface area, or marked inflammatory rash covering ≥30% of the body surface area.

Characteristics of physicians (n = 100) who participated in the physician survey (direct medical cost) Mean ± standard deviation. ‡Each state was defined as follows: state A, minimal symptoms; state B, only mild rash regardless of area; state C, marked inflammatory rash covering <10% of the body surface area; and state D, severe inflammatory rash covering ≥10% but <30% of the body surface area, or marked inflammatory rash covering ≥30% of the body surface area. The characteristics of the 400 patients enrolled in the Web‐based survey of the self‐medication costs and productivity loss are summarized in Table 2. Although they were allocated to be equal in sex ratio and severity ratio, there was no significant imbalance in the age distribution among the severity groups. Similarly, although there was no significant imbalance among the severity groups in terms of employment status, the proportion of part‐time workers was slightly higher in the most severe group.
Table 2

Characteristics of patients who participated in patient survey (self‐medication cost and productivity loss)

 TotalMild Moderate Severe Most severe
n % n % n % n % n %
Whole population400100100100100100100100100100
Sex
Male200505050505050505050
Female200505050505050505050
Age group
20s389.5551111151577
30s12631.53333343426263333
40s15338.34040323238384343
50s8320.82222232321211717
Employment status
Regular employee16762.83864446344684157
Executive of company or corporation72.612341223
Self‐employed worker and family worker2710.281457101546
Dispatched worker from temporary labor agency114.147112346
Part‐time worker, temporary worker5420.381417248122129

Each severity was defined as follows: mild, state with skin that dries out with no marked change in skin color or condition, or reddish skin that dries out; moderate, state with remaining scratched marks or solidified swelling on skin due to worsening of drying‐out, redness and roughness; severe, state with worsened symptoms covering ~10% of all skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling; and most severe, state with worsened symptoms covering >10% of all skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling.

Characteristics of patients who participated in patient survey (self‐medication cost and productivity loss) Each severity was defined as follows: mild, state with skin that dries out with no marked change in skin color or condition, or reddish skin that dries out; moderate, state with remaining scratched marks or solidified swelling on skin due to worsening of drying‐out, redness and roughness; severe, state with worsened symptoms covering ~10% of all skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling; and most severe, state with worsened symptoms covering >10% of all skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling. The calculation results of the annual direct medical cost per patient by state are summarized in Table 3. The mean annual expected cost per patient of adult AD was JPY 136 501 (median, JPY 88 945). By severity, it was estimated as JPY 97 691 (median, JPY 54 905) for state A, JPY 96 531 (JPY 79 015) for state B, JPY 131 037 (JPY 94 779) for state C and JPY 219 699 (JPY 131 874) for state D. It increased as the condition deteriorated by 1.36 times from state B to state C, and by 1.68 times from state C to state D.
Table 3

Direct medical cost (annual medical cost per patient by severity) (JPY/year)

ItemOverallState A State B State C State D
n MeanSDMedian n MeanSDMedian n MeanSDMedian n MeanSDMedian n MeanSDMedian
Total cost346 136 501151 04188 94571 97 691115 89254 90595 96 53175 37179 01595 131 037109 11194 77985 219 699229 581131 874
Outpatient132 977149 13886 98696 034115 20954 90592 84069 69579 015129 688109 03994 779212 371228 438126 188
Basic medical examination fees § 21 002995317 32013 731768014 40018 352857014 46023 058832728 80027 741972428 800
Test costs § 696314 635967520112 7172640011 999733663614 3101602942718 5853048
Additional treatment costs § 10783 0120589154707892 690010932 9350179240880
Drug‐related costs § 103 935143 59956 27276 514113 11035 64367 29865 55547 11998 902103 64966 238173 410223 90589 866
Inpatient352418 4100165773390369127 9220134865380732820 0950
Basic medical examination fees § 317916 1880153167780318923 5810115057080681218 9450
Test costs § 243199909052304073618014872802949380
Additional treatment costs § 24234063104441105440371800
Drug‐related costs § 7838102915405136704527901855670

Each state was defined as follows: state A, minimal symptoms; state B, only mild rash regardless of area; state C, marked inflammatory rash covering <10% of the body surface area; and state D, severe inflammatory rash covering ≥10% but <30% of the body surface area, or marked inflammatory rash covering ≥30% of the body surface area. ‡The respondents whose total cost was within the top 5% were excluded in each state. §The cost details included were as follows: “basic medical examination fees”, (outpatient) revisit fee, prescription fee, injection fee and (inpatient) hospitalization basic fee; “test costs”, biochemical test (I), non‐specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E test, specific IgE test, eosinophil blood count test, thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine test, patch test, prick (scratch) test and histamine‐release test; “additional treatment costs”, ultraviolet therapy/photochemotherapy; “drug‐related costs”, each drug cost, (outpatient) dispensation fee, dispensation basic fee, pharmaceutical management fee, (inpatient) dispensation fee and dispensing technology basic fee. SD, standard deviation.

Direct medical cost (annual medical cost per patient by severity) (JPY/year) Each state was defined as follows: state A, minimal symptoms; state B, only mild rash regardless of area; state C, marked inflammatory rash covering <10% of the body surface area; and state D, severe inflammatory rash covering ≥10% but <30% of the body surface area, or marked inflammatory rash covering ≥30% of the body surface area. ‡The respondents whose total cost was within the top 5% were excluded in each state. §The cost details included were as follows: “basic medical examination fees”, (outpatient) revisit fee, prescription fee, injection fee and (inpatient) hospitalization basic fee; “test costs”, biochemical test (I), non‐specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E test, specific IgE test, eosinophil blood count test, thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine test, patch test, prick (scratch) test and histamine‐release test; “additional treatment costs”, ultraviolet therapy/photochemotherapy; “drug‐related costs”, each drug cost, (outpatient) dispensation fee, dispensation basic fee, pharmaceutical management fee, (inpatient) dispensation fee and dispensing technology basic fee. SD, standard deviation. In terms of cost breakdown, outpatient medical costs accounted for over 95% of the total, and the proportions were similar regardless of severity. The proportions of drug‐related costs and hospitalization fees were the highest among outpatient costs and in hospitalization costs, respectively, and the drug‐related costs accounted for 78% of outpatient costs. The outpatient drug‐related costs increased by 1.47 times from state B to state C and by 1.75 times from state C to state D.

Self‐medication costs

The mean expected self‐medication cost per patient was JPY 4726/month. The cost of OTC drugs was the highest (JPY 1077/month), followed by cosmetics (JPY 915/month) and foods (JPY 828/month) (Table 4).
Table 4

Self‐medication cost (monthly cost per patient by medication type) (JPY/month)

Item n MeanSDMedian
Foods400828.33479.580
OTC drugs4001076.53773.150
Cosmetics400915.12745.660
Body cleaning agents400705.61505.790
Clothes400423.31533.870
Bedding400431.32559.440
Other400346.32831.000
Total amount4004726.210 510.931000

Question: Approximately how much did you pay per month for the items purchased due to AD in the past 3 months? AD, atopic dermatitis; OTC, over‐the‐counter; SD, standard deviation.

Self‐medication cost (monthly cost per patient by medication type) (JPY/month) Question: Approximately how much did you pay per month for the items purchased due to AD in the past 3 months? AD, atopic dermatitis; OTC, over‐the‐counter; SD, standard deviation. The calculation results of the self‐medication cost by sex and severity are summarized in Table 5. The mean expected self‐medication cost per adult AD patient by sex was estimated to be JPY 3796/month (JPY 45 547/year) for males and JPY 5657/month (JPY 67 883/year) for females, and the cost for females was higher. On comparison by severity, the self‐medication costs approximately increased with severity in both sexes, and the self‐medication costs in most severe cases were JPY 92 414/year for males and JPY 133 644/year for females.
Table 5

Self‐medication cost (monthly and annual cost per patient by sex and severity)

ItemGroup (sex and severity ) n MeanSDMedian
Monthly cost per patient (JPY/month)Whole population400472610 510.931000
MaleTotal20037969744.39600
Mild507501489.430
Moderate50406212 342.31500
Severe5026695638.40700
Most severe50770113 148.613000
FemaleTotal200565711 172.311500
Mild5013722616.040
Moderate5034138515.43300
Severe50670613 921.562250
Most severe5011 13713 345.986750
Annual cost per patient (JPY/year)Whole population40056 715126 131.1612 000
MaleTotal20045 547116 932.637200
Mild50900017 873.160
Moderate5048 744148 107.726000
Severe5032 02867 660.768400
Most severe5092 414157 783.2836 000
FemaleTotal20067 883134 067.6918 000
Mild5016 46431 392.540
Moderate5040 950102 185.133600
Severe5080 472167 058.7827 000
Most severe50133 644160 151.7681 000

Question: Approximately how much did you pay per month for the items purchased due to AD in the past 3 months? ‡Each severity was defined as follows: mild, state with skin that dries out with no marked change in skin color or condition or reddish skin that dries out; moderate, state with remaining scratch marks or solidified swelling on skin due to worsening of drying‐out, redness and roughness; severe, state with worsened symptoms covering ~10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling; most severe, state with worsened symptoms covering >10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling. AD, atopic dermatitis; SD, standard deviation.

Self‐medication cost (monthly and annual cost per patient by sex and severity) Question: Approximately how much did you pay per month for the items purchased due to AD in the past 3 months? ‡Each severity was defined as follows: mild, state with skin that dries out with no marked change in skin color or condition or reddish skin that dries out; moderate, state with remaining scratch marks or solidified swelling on skin due to worsening of drying‐out, redness and roughness; severe, state with worsened symptoms covering ~10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling; most severe, state with worsened symptoms covering >10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling. AD, atopic dermatitis; SD, standard deviation.

Productivity losses

The results of the survey on productivity loss using WPAI/AD are summarized in Table 6. The OWI (%) of adult AD patients was 33.4% for regular workers and 37.2% for non‐regular workers (median, 30% for both), and the OWI (%) increased with severity for both males and females. The absenteeism (%) for regular workers and non‐regular workers was 2.1% and 5.5%, respectively, and the presenteeism (%) was 31.4% and 31.8%, respectively, demonstrating that the majority of OWI is due to the presenteeism. The AI (%) for housewives also increased with severity.
Table 6

WPAI calculation

ItemGroup (sex and severity )Working status n Mean (%)SDMedian (%)
OWIOverall populationRegular19733.40.3230
Non‐regular6437.20.3330
MaleTotalRegular15231.60.3120
Non‐regular1436.00.3235
MildRegular39100.160
Non‐regular2200.2820
ModerateRegular3822.60.2510
Non‐regular5300.2820
SevereRegular3842.90.2940
Non‐regular0NANANA
Most severeRegular3751.90.3250
Non‐regular744.80.3650
FemaleTotalRegular4539.70.3440
Non‐regular5037.60.3330
MildRegular61.70.040
Non‐regular10140.185
ModerateRegular1242.50.2340
Non‐regular1328.80.3710
SevereRegular1736.80.3530
Non‐regular10320.2325
Most severeRegular10640.3570
Non‐regular1761.50.3070
Absenteeism § Overall populationRegular1972.10.100
Non‐regular645.50.200
MaleTotalRegular1521.40.070
Non‐regular146.20.230
MildRegular391.40.090
Non‐regular20.00.000
ModerateRegular382.50.110
Non‐regular50.00.000
SevereRegular380.80.040
Non‐regular0NANANA
Most severeRegular370.80.030
Non‐regular712.40.330
FemaleTotalRegular454.40.150
Non‐regular505.30.200
MildRegular60.00.000
Non‐regular100.00.000
ModerateRegular123.20.110
Non‐regular136.50.190
SevereRegular172.00.070
Non‐regular100.00.000
Most severeRegular1012.50.260
Non‐regular1710.60.290
Presenteeism § Overall populationRegular19731.40.3020
Non‐regular6431.80.2920
MaleTotalRegular15230.20.3020
Non‐regular1429.80.2825
MildRegular398.60.140
Non‐regular2200.2820
ModerateRegular3820.10.2210
Non‐regular5300.2820
SevereRegular3842.20.2940
Non‐regular0NANANA
Most severeRegular3751.10.3150
Non‐regular732.40.3130
FemaleTotalRegular4535.30.3130
Non‐regular5032.30.3020
MildRegular61.70.040
Non‐regular10140.185
ModerateRegular1239.20.2140
Non‐regular1322.40.3010
SevereRegular1734.80.3530
Non‐regular10320.2325
Most severeRegular1051.50.3050
Non‐regular1750.90.3160
AIFemaleTotal9939.20.3540
Mild3316.40.250
Moderate2229.10.2725
Severe2258.60.2960
Most severe2264.10.3270

Each severity was defined as follows: mild, state with skin that dries out with no marked change in skin color or condition, or reddish skin that dries out; moderate, state with remaining scratched marks or solidified swelling on skin due to worsening of drying‐out, redness and roughness; severe, state with worsened symptoms covering ~10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling; most severe, state with worsened symptoms covering >10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling. ‡Regular worker and non‐regular workers include the following statuses in employment: “regular workers”, regular employee, executive of company or corporation, self‐employed worker and family worker; “non‐regular workers”, dispatched worker from temporary labor agency, part‐time worker and temporary worker. §The questions related to absenteeism and presenteeism were calculated for employed workers. Non‐responders and those who answered that the actual number of working hours was excluded. AI, activity impairment; OWI, overall work impairment; SD, standard deviation; WPAI, work productivity and activity impairment.

WPAI calculation Each severity was defined as follows: mild, state with skin that dries out with no marked change in skin color or condition, or reddish skin that dries out; moderate, state with remaining scratched marks or solidified swelling on skin due to worsening of drying‐out, redness and roughness; severe, state with worsened symptoms covering ~10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling; most severe, state with worsened symptoms covering >10% of the whole skin such as raised skin with reddish swelling, flaky skin and skin peeling. ‡Regular worker and non‐regular workers include the following statuses in employment: “regular workers”, regular employee, executive of company or corporation, self‐employed worker and family worker; “non‐regular workers”, dispatched worker from temporary labor agency, part‐time worker and temporary worker. §The questions related to absenteeism and presenteeism were calculated for employed workers. Non‐responders and those who answered that the actual number of working hours was excluded. AI, activity impairment; OWI, overall work impairment; SD, standard deviation; WPAI, work productivity and activity impairment. The estimation results of the annual cost of illness per patient for adult AD in Japan and the nationwide cost of illness are summarized in Table 7. The direct medical costs per patient ranged from JPY 97 111/year (mild) to JPY 219 699/year (severe/most severe), the self‐medication costs ranged from JPY 13 494/year (mild) to JPY 117 238/year (most severe), the productivity loss for OWI of employees ranged from JPY 428 000/year (mild) to JPY 2506 000/year (most severe), and the productivity loss for AI of housewives ranged from JPY 643 000/year (mild) to JPY 2512 000/year (most severe). The nationwide disease burden for adult AD in 2018 was estimated at JPY 3036.9 billion, of which the direct medical cost was JPY 450.5 billion (14.8%), the self‐medication cost was JPY 86.3 billion (2.8%), the OWI was JPY 2117.2 billion (69.7%) and the AI was JPY 382.9 billion (12.6%).
Table 7

Estimation of annual cost of illness for adult AD in Japan

 Cost per patient (JPY/year)Total cost (JPY)
Direct medical cost
Mild97 111 331.9 billion
Moderate131 03799.0 billion
Severe219 699 14.1 billion
Most severe219 699 5.6 billion
Total450.5 billion (14.8%)
Self‐medication cost
Mild13 49446.1 billion
Moderate44 05133.3 billion
Severe61 1953.9 billion
Most severe117 2383.0 billion
Total86.3 billion (2.8%)
OWI §
Mild427 5511188.4 billion
Moderate1 289 522792.0 billion
Severe1 625 22084.6 billion
Most severe2 506 16752.2 billion
Total2117.2 billion (69.7%)
AI §
Mild642 666257.2 billion
Moderate1 140 340100.9 billion
Severe2 296 35517.2 billion
Most severe2 511 8847.5 billion
Total382.9 billion (12.6%)
Total amount3036.9 billion/year

The direct medical cost per patient for mild AD was the mean of the costs for state A and state B. ‡The direct medical cost per patient for severe and most severe AD was the costs for state D. §The annual wage used to calculate productivity loss was estimated as “contractual monthly cash earnings” (including overtime worked) × 12 + “annual special earnings”. OWI = estimated wage × OWI (%). Absenteeism = estimated wage × absenteeism (%). Presenteeism = estimated w× (OWI [%] − absenteeism [%]). AI = estimated wage × AI (%). AD, atopic dermatitis; AI, activity impairment; OWI, overall work impairment; SD, standard deviation; WPAI, work productivity and activity impairment.

Estimation of annual cost of illness for adult AD in Japan The direct medical cost per patient for mild AD was the mean of the costs for state A and state B. ‡The direct medical cost per patient for severe and most severe AD was the costs for state D. §The annual wage used to calculate productivity loss was estimated as “contractual monthly cash earnings” (including overtime worked) × 12 + “annual special earnings”. OWI = estimated wage × OWI (%). Absenteeism = estimated wage × absenteeism (%). Presenteeism = estimated w× (OWI [%] − absenteeism [%]). AI = estimated wage × AI (%). AD, atopic dermatitis; AI, activity impairment; OWI, overall work impairment; SD, standard deviation; WPAI, work productivity and activity impairment.

Discussion

In our study, the disease burden for adult AD in Japan in 2018 was estimated at approximately JPY 3 trillion, corresponding to 0.55% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product (GDP) in 2018. All items comprising the cost per patient for adult AD (direct medical costs, self‐medication cost and productivity loss) increased with disease severity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a cross‐sectional Web‐based survey of the cost of illness for adult AD patients in Japan focusing on disease severity. The direct medical cost of adult AD patients was estimated at JPY 450 billion/year based on the survey of medical resource consumption for 100 Japanese physicians who regularly treat AD patients. It accounted for approximately 80% of the medical cost of JPY 565.1 billion categorized as “XII. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disease (classification by the name of the main injuries or diseases determined according to International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)‐10)” among the Japanese national medical expenditure of JPY 43.071 trillion in 2017 financial year. The WPAI survey confirmed that even in mild cases, accounting for 80% of adult AD patients, the performance decreased by approximately 10% during working hours (weighted average value of presenteeism by sex and working status in mild cases). The productivity loss per year caused by OWI, including absenteeism and presenteeism, in mild cases was estimated at approximately JPY 430 000 per patient and JPY 1.2 trillion as a whole in Japan (56% of the total productivity loss for adult AD patients). Similarly, in moderate cases, accounting for 17.7% of adult AD patients, the performance decreased by approximately 25%. The productivity loss per year was estimated at approximately JPY 1 290 000/patient and JPY 792.0 billion as a whole (37% of the total productivity loss for adult AD patients). Although severe and most severe cases only account for 2% of all patients, the decrease in performance during working hours became as high as approximately 44%. Comparing the costs per patient in moderate cases, the direct medical cost increased by 1.7 times, the productivity loss for OWI increased by 1.3 times and 1.9 times, and the productivity loss for AI increased by 2 times and 2.2 times in severe and most severe cases, respectively. Many clinical studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors among drugs for ameliorating inflammation due to AD. The use of different topical corticosteroids depending on AD severity based on the steroid strength is recommended. In addition to treatment with these drugs, administration of cyclosporin, oral steroids, dupilumab and so forth will be also considered at the time of exacerbation. Disease severity‐based nationwide estimation of the disease burden for adult AD was JPY 1823.6 billion (mild), JPY 1025.2 billion (moderate), JPY 119.8 billion (severe) and JPY 68.3 billion (more severe), respectively. In the viewpoint of the impact of nationwide expenditure, more efficient treatment interventions, namely efficient selection of more effective and less expensive treatment, are expected for mild and moderate AD patients, which account for the majority of AD patients. Although caution is needed when comparing the disease burden among countries, the mean WPAI and AI scores in a WPAI survey of 1860 AD patients conducted by Eckert et al. were 27.00% and 31.77%, respectively. Murota et al.’s reported mean overall WPAI score of 31 AD patients was 40.4%. These results are consistent with our findings (34.3% and 39.2%, respectively). Furthermore, in the patients with a Dermatology Life Quality Index of more than 10 (corresponding to severe and most severe), it was 57.11% and 51.72%, respectively, also consistent with our findings. In an Internet‐based, international population survey, 2013 Japan National Health and Wellness Survey, performed by Arima et al. using data of 634 registered Japanese AD patients, the mean OWI and AI scores were 30.61% and 32.18%, respectively, consistent with our survey results. The cost of illness with regard to domestic income was assessed using the estimated amount adjusted by GDP. Schofield et al. measured annual losses of arthritis through early retirement was equivalent to 0.7% of the GDP. Lubloy reported that the economic burden of migraine in Latvia and Lithuania was equivalent to 0.42% and 0.35%, respectively. The cost of illness of adult AD patients (0.55% against the GDP) estimated in our analysis cannot be considered inconsequential. Villacorta et al. conducted a survey on total work productivity loss (WPL) in 936 patients with psoriasis in France, Germany, Spain, the UK, Italy and the USA. Average indirect costs associated with total WPL for patients with mild (body surface area [BSA], 0–2%), moderate (BSA, 3–10%) and severe (BSA, >10%) psoriasis were USD 3592, USD 7478 and USD 12 194, respectively. According to the survey for health‐care resource utilization of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in France (the ASSURE‐CSU study), the mean total direct costs of CSU was EUR 2397 per patient per year and the indirect costs for 4 weeks were mainly driven by presenteeism (EUR 421) and work productivity loss (EUR 420). Although it requires attention to compare those estimates conducted in other countries due to differences in the medical environments and economic situations, they tended to be smaller than our estimates for AD patients. Several limitations in the present study need to be considered. First, the direct medical cost was based on the Web survey of health‐care resource use for physicians. Igarashi et al. estimated the value related to AD for outpatient visits to be 6.324 times per year in a retrospective claims database analysis of health‐care resource use. On the other hand, in our Web survey, the mean number of outpatient visits per year for states A through D was 4.6 times, 6.7 times, 8 times and 12 times, respectively. The weighted average by the severity distribution was 5.07 times per year. These values were mostly within acceptable range considering the uncertainty of the consistency of disease severity and age distributions with those of Igarashi et al. The validity of the physicians’ answers in this survey was confirmed to some extent. Second, the reliability of the survey results on self‐medication costs is uncertain. As no previous studies on self‐medication costs were available, sufficient validation was unable to be performed. However, as the proportion of overall cost of illness was 2.8%, it was considered to have little influence on the estimation results. To reduce the uncertainty of the nationwide estimation, further verification of the robustness of the results is expected using statistical inference methods such as bootstrap method or Monte Carlo method.

Conclusion

In the present study, the cost of illness of adult AD patients in Japan was estimated to be approximately JPY 3 trillion/year. The cost per patient increased with disease severity. The OWI for adult AD patients was 34.3%, demonstrating the degree of impairment to increase with severity. Considering the physical and mental burdens, the burden of illness for adult AD was considered to be vast.

Conflict of Interest

H. M. received consulting fees and/or speaker honoraria from Japan Tobacco, Maruho, Shiseido, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Sanofi Genzyme, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Torii Pharmaceutical, Lily, Abbie, Taiho Pharma, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Kao, Novartis, Kracie, NAOS, Sato Pharmaceutical, Tokiwa Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical and Pola Pharma. S. I. is an employee of CRECON Medical Assessment. CRECON Medical Assessment was paid by Japan Tobacco and Torii Pharmaceutical to conduct analyses for the study. K. Y. and A. I. are employees of Japan Tobacco.
  18 in total

1.  Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: Results from an international survey.

Authors:  S Barbarot; S Auziere; A Gadkari; G Girolomoni; L Puig; E L Simpson; D J Margolis; M de Bruin-Weller; L Eckert
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 13.146

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis 2018.

Authors:  Norito Katoh; Yukihiro Ohya; Masanori Ikeda; Tamotsu Ebihara; Ichiro Katayama; Hidehisa Saeki; Naoki Shimojo; Akio Tanaka; Takeshi Nakahara; Mizuho Nagao; Michihiro Hide; Yuji Fujita; Takao Fujisawa; Masaki Futamura; Koji Masuda; Hiroyuki Murota; Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.005

3.  Burden of illness in adults with atopic dermatitis: Analysis of National Health and Wellness Survey data from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Laurent Eckert; Shaloo Gupta; Abhijit Gadkari; Puneet Mahajan; Joel M Gelfand
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Health-related utility among adults with atopic dermatitis treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment as maintenance therapy over the long term: findings from the Protopic CONTROL study.

Authors:  C D Poole; C Chambers; M K Sidhu; C J Currie
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.302

5.  Economic Impact of Atopic Dermatitis in Korean Patients.

Authors:  Chulmin Kim; Kui Young Park; Seohee Ahn; Dong Ha Kim; Kapsok Li; Do Won Kim; Moon-Beom Kim; Sun-Jin Jo; Hyeon Woo Yim; Seong Jun Seo
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  Atopic dermatitis disease registry in Japanese adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (ADDRESS-J): Baseline characteristics, treatment history and disease burden.

Authors:  Norito Katoh; Hidehisa Saeki; Yoko Kataoka; Takafumi Etoh; Satoshi Teramukai; Hiroki Takagi; Yuki Tajima; Marius Ardeleanu; Elena Rizova; Kazuhiko Arima
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.005

7.  Health-care resource use and current treatment of adult atopic dermatitis patients in Japan: A retrospective claims database analysis.

Authors:  Atsuyuki Igarashi; Hiroyuki Fujita; Kazuhiko Arima; Tomoyuki Inoue; Julie Dorey; Ayako Fukushima; Yurie Taguchi
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.005

8.  A multinational assessment of work-related productivity loss and indirect costs from a survey of patients with psoriasis.

Authors:  R Villacorta; A Teeple; S Lee; S Fakharzadeh; J Lucas; S McElligott
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  The personal and national costs of lost labour force participation due to arthritis: an economic study.

Authors:  Deborah J Schofield; Rupendra N Shrestha; Richard Percival; Megan E Passey; Emily J Callander; Simon J Kelly
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Economic burden of migraine in Latvia and Lithuania: direct and indirect costs.

Authors:  Ágnes Lublóy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  7 in total

1.  Societal Costs of Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Occurring in Adulthood: A Danish Register-based Study.

Authors:  Jacob P Thyssen; Andreas W Brenneche; Maria E Madsen; Mikkel H Pedersen; Dennis J Trangbaek; Christian Vestergaard
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 2.  Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults and Adolescents: a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Ahmad N Fasseeh; Baher Elezbawy; Nada Korra; Mohamed Tannira; Hala Dalle; Sandrine Aderian; Sherif Abaza; Zoltán Kaló
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-10-05

3.  A phase 3 randomized, multicenter, double-blind study to evaluate the safety of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Japan (Rising Up): An interim 24-week analysis.

Authors:  Norito Katoh; Yukihiro Ohya; Hiroyuki Murota; Masanori Ikeda; Xiaofei Hu; Kimitoshi Ikeda; John Liu; Takuya Sasaki; Alvina D Chu; Henrique D Teixeira; Hidehisa Saeki
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2021-12-20

4.  Drug costs in context: assessing drug costs in cost-of-illness analyses.

Authors:  T Joseph Mattingly; Shannon Weathers
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2022-07-21

5.  A phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, vehicle-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of two crisaborole regimens in Japanese patients aged 2 years and older with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Kayo Fujita; Michio Yagi; Shinichi Moriwaki; Mizuki Yoshida; Daniela Graham
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Burden of illness, medication adherence, and unmet medical needs in Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective analysis of a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Kazumasa Kamei; Tomohiro Hirose; Noritoshi Yoshii; Akio Tanaka
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Cost-of-illness study for axillary hyperhidrosis in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Murota; Tomoko Fujimoto; Yuichiro Oshima; Yasuhiko Tamada; Takeshi Yanagishita; Naoya Murayama; Sachie Inoue; Hiromichi Okatsu; Hiroshi Miyama; Hiroo Yokozeki
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.005

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.