Sydney Heiss1, D Catherine Walker2, Drew A Anderson3, Julie N Morison4, Julia M Hormes3. 1. Department of Psychology, Social Sciences 399, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA. sheiss@albany.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, Union College, Schenectady, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Social Sciences 399, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA. 4. HPA/LiveWell, Albany, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Past work suggests that vegetarianism is common in patients diagnosed with eating disorders (EDs), but the exact nature of this association is unclear, with reports conflicting as to whether vegetarianism is a risk factor for EDs, complicates ED treatment, or is wholly innocuous. Since vegetarianism has been on the rise, the need for current data on possible links with EDs is substantial. METHODS: We collected data on demographics, vegetarian status, ED diagnosis, current body mass index (BMI), highest and lowest BMI, Eating Attitudes Test, and Multifactorial Assessment of Eating Disorders Symptoms scores at intake in 124 patients (84.7% women, 90.3% white, Mage = 23.92 ± 9.16 years) admitted to an intensive outpatient ED program. RESULTS: We first compared omnivores (n = 72, 58.1%), meat-reducers (n = 27, 21.8%), vegetarians (n = 20, 16.1%), and vegans (n = 5, 4.0%) and found no significant differences in any demographic or outcome variable, with the exception that vegetarians reported significantly lower highest-ever BMI compared to meat-reducers (p = 0.03). To mirror past chart reviews, we then compared the combined groups of meat avoiders (n = 52, 41.9%) to the omnivores (n = 72, 58.1%) and found no significant differences in demographics or ED symptoms (all ps > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, data support that meat restriction does not imply greater ED severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, descriptive study, retrospective chart review.
PURPOSE: Past work suggests that vegetarianism is common in patients diagnosed with eating disorders (EDs), but the exact nature of this association is unclear, with reports conflicting as to whether vegetarianism is a risk factor for EDs, complicates ED treatment, or is wholly innocuous. Since vegetarianism has been on the rise, the need for current data on possible links with EDs is substantial. METHODS: We collected data on demographics, vegetarian status, ED diagnosis, current body mass index (BMI), highest and lowest BMI, Eating Attitudes Test, and Multifactorial Assessment of Eating Disorders Symptoms scores at intake in 124 patients (84.7% women, 90.3% white, Mage = 23.92 ± 9.16 years) admitted to an intensive outpatient ED program. RESULTS: We first compared omnivores (n = 72, 58.1%), meat-reducers (n = 27, 21.8%), vegetarians (n = 20, 16.1%), and vegans (n = 5, 4.0%) and found no significant differences in any demographic or outcome variable, with the exception that vegetarians reported significantly lower highest-ever BMI compared to meat-reducers (p = 0.03). To mirror past chart reviews, we then compared the combined groups of meat avoiders (n = 52, 41.9%) to the omnivores (n = 72, 58.1%) and found no significant differences in demographics or ED symptoms (all ps > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, data support that meat restriction does not imply greater ED severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, descriptive study, retrospective chart review.
Authors: Winston J Craig; Ann Reed Mangels; Ujué Fresán; Kate Marsh; Fayth L Miles; Angela V Saunders; Ella H Haddad; Celine E Heskey; Patricia Johnston; Enette Larson-Meyer; Michael Orlich Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 5.717