Fatma Ceren Sarioglu1, Orkun Sarioglu2, Handan Guleryuz3, Erdener Ozer4, Dilek Ince5, Hatice Nur Olgun5. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Balcova, 35340, Izmir, Turkey. drcerenunal@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University, Izmir, Turkey. 3. Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Balcova, 35340, Izmir, Turkey. 4. Department of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey. 5. Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI texture analysis (TA) for differentiation of pediatric craniofacial rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) from infantile hemangioma (IH). METHODS: This study included 15 patients with RMS and 42 patients with IH who underwent MRI before an invasive procedure. All patients had a solitary lesion. T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted axial images were used for TA. Two readers delineated the tumor borders for TA independently and evaluated the qualitative MRI characteristics in consensus. The differences of the texture features' values between the groups were assessed and ROC curves were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the value of TA with and without the combination of the qualitative MRI characteristics. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-eight texture features were calculated for each tumor. Eighteen features on T2-weighted images and 25 features on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were significantly different between the RMSs and IHs. On contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, the short-zone emphasis (SZE), which was a gray-level zone length matrix (GLZLM) parameter, had the largest area under the curve: 0.899 (sensitivity 93%, specificity 87%). The independent predictor for the RMS among the qualitative MRI characteristics was heterogeneous contrast enhancement (p < 0.001). Using only a GLZLM_SZE value of lower than 0.72 was found to be the best diagnostic parameter in predicting RMS (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 8.770-992.4). CONCLUSION: MRI-based TA may contribute to differentiate RMS from IH without invasive procedures. KEY POINTS: • Texture analysis may help to distinguish between rhabdomyosarcoma and infantile hemangioma without invasive procedures. • The gray-level zone length matrix parameters, especially the short-zone emphasis, may be a potential predictor for rhabdomyosarcoma. • Using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images may be superior to T2-weighted images to differentiate rhabdomyosarcoma from infantile hemangioma in texture analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI texture analysis (TA) for differentiation of pediatric craniofacial rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) from infantile hemangioma (IH). METHODS: This study included 15 patients with RMS and 42 patients with IH who underwent MRI before an invasive procedure. All patients had a solitary lesion. T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted axial images were used for TA. Two readers delineated the tumor borders for TA independently and evaluated the qualitative MRI characteristics in consensus. The differences of the texture features' values between the groups were assessed and ROC curves were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the value of TA with and without the combination of the qualitative MRI characteristics. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-eight texture features were calculated for each tumor. Eighteen features on T2-weighted images and 25 features on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images were significantly different between the RMSs and IHs. On contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, the short-zone emphasis (SZE), which was a gray-level zone length matrix (GLZLM) parameter, had the largest area under the curve: 0.899 (sensitivity 93%, specificity 87%). The independent predictor for the RMS among the qualitative MRI characteristics was heterogeneous contrast enhancement (p < 0.001). Using only a GLZLM_SZE value of lower than 0.72 was found to be the best diagnostic parameter in predicting RMS (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 8.770-992.4). CONCLUSION: MRI-based TA may contribute to differentiate RMS from IH without invasive procedures. KEY POINTS: • Texture analysis may help to distinguish between rhabdomyosarcoma and infantile hemangioma without invasive procedures. • The gray-level zone length matrix parameters, especially the short-zone emphasis, may be a potential predictor for rhabdomyosarcoma. • Using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images may be superior to T2-weighted images to differentiate rhabdomyosarcoma from infantile hemangioma in texture analysis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child; Computer-assisted image analysis; Hemangioma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rhabdomyosarcoma