| Literature DB >> 32382311 |
Jun Kan1, Haifu Huang2, Zhangyu Jiang3, Ruisheng Zhou3, Shasha Bai3, Caijie Liao3, Jiancong Chen3, Jun Dong4, Yunlong Zhang5, Jingzhi Zhang6, Rong Zhang7, Daihan Zhou1, Enxin Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Arenobufagin (ARE) has demonstrated potent anticancer activity in various types of tumor, but the role and mechanism of ARE for lung cancer remain unclear. Oxidative stress exists under normal conditions and is an inevitable state in the body. A variety of noxious stimuli can break the equilibrium state of oxidative stress and promote apoptosis. Here, we used a CCK-8 assay to examine cell viability. We determined oxidative stress damage by measuring levels of intracellular ROS and levels of GSH, SOD, and MDA. Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining assay, as well as the Hoechst 33258 staining, was used to detect ARE-induced apoptosis in A549 cell. Evaluation of the expression level of the specified molecule was indicated by Western blot and qRT-PCR. Loss of function experiment was carried out using NAC pretreatment. The experimental results show that ARE significantly declines in the viability of A549 cells and increases the apoptosis rate of A549 cells. As reflected in cell morphology, the A549 cells showed features of shrinkage and had incompletely packed membranes; the same phenomenon is manifested in Hoechst 33258 staining. Following ARE treatment, the ROS level in A549 cells was rising in a concentration-dependent manner, and so were MDA and GSH levels, while the SOD level was decreasing. Moreover, we found that ARE can decrease mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and a cascade of apoptotic processes can be triggered by decreased MMP. Importantly, we found significant changes in protein expression levels and mRNA levels of apoptosis-related proteins. Furthermore, when we used NAC to restrain oxidative stress, the expression levels of apoptosis-related proteins have also changed accordingly. Our data demonstrate that apoptosis in the non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line A549 is caused by oxidative stress due to ARE. Our research also shows that ARE may have the potential to become a targeted therapeutic for the treatment of NSCLC in the future.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32382311 PMCID: PMC7195657 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8909171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1ARE-induced injury in A549 cell. (a) Chemical structure of ARE. (b) A549 cells were handled with ARE at a concentration of 10–40 nM for 24 h, and CCK-8 assay was used to detect the cell activity. (c) ARE treatment increased the LDH release in A549 cells. (d) Morphological changes of A549 cells were induced by ARE. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 2ARE-induced A549 cell apoptosis. A549 cells were pretreated with ARE at concentrations of 10, 20, and 40 nM for 24 h. (a) Hoechst 33258 staining revealed ARE-induced chromatin contraction in A549 cells in each group. Scale bars: 100 μm; magnification: 50 μm. (b), (c) Flow cytometry was used to detect apoptotic cells: (b) the raw flow cytometry figures; (c) the apoptosis rates. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 3The effect of ARE on proapoptotic protein expression and MMP. A549 cells were treated with ARE (10–40 nM) for 24 h. (a) ARE-induced cleaved PARP, cleaved caspase-3, and caspase-9 expression. (b) ARE increased Bax expression but reduced Bcl-2 expression. (c) A549 cells are administered 24 hours after ARE administration; they were stained with JC-1. After that the mitochondrial membrane potential was observed under the fluorescence microscope. Scale bars: 100 μm. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 4Effect of ARE on the expression of apoptosis-related genes in A549 cells. A549 cells were treated with ARE (10–40 nM) for 24 h. The mRNA levels of Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-9, and caspase-3 were measured by real-time PCR (Figures 4(a)–4(d)). The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 5Effects of ARE on intracellular ROS and related antioxidant enzyme. A549 cells were pretreated with ARE (10–40 nM) for 24 h. (a) ROS levels were observed under the fluorescence microscope and then quantitatively analyzed by flow cytometry using DCFH-DA. (b) Quantitative analysis of ROS staining. (c) ARE treatment increased the level of MDA in A549 cells. (d), (e) ARE reduced the activity of GSH and SOD in A549 cells. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 6The effects of NAC on apoptotic response in A549 cells treated with ARE. Pretreatment of A549 cells with antioxidant agent and the changes of apoptosis-related proteins (Figures 6(a)–6(d)). The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). P < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 7Proposed mechanisms for ARE-induced apoptosis.