Literature DB >> 32381512

Improving response to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer.

Eva Baxter1, Donal J Brennan2,3, Jessica N McAlpine4,5, Jennifer J Mueller6,7, Frédéric Amant8,9, Mignon D J M van Gent9, David G Huntsman5,10, Robert L Coleman11, Shannon N Westin11, Melinda S Yates11, Camilla Krakstad12,13, Michael A Quinn14, Monika Janda15, Andreas Obermair16.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This review examines how response rates to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer can be improved. In addition to providing a brief overview of the pathogenesis of low-grade endometrial cancer, we discuss limitations in the current classification of endometrial cancer and how stratification may be refined using molecular markers to reproducibly identify 'low-risk' cancers which may represent the best candidates for progestin therapy. We also discuss constraints in current approaches to progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer and perform a systematic review of predictive biomarkers.
METHODS: PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting pre-treatment biomarkers associated with outcome in women with low-grade endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia with an intact uterus who received progestin treatment. Studies of fewer than 50 women were excluded. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID 152374). A descriptive synthesis of pre-treatment predictive biomarkers reported in the included studies was conducted.
RESULTS: Of 1908 records reviewed, 19 studies were included. Clinical features such as age or body mass index cannot predict progestin response. Lesions defined as 'low-risk' by FIGO criteria (stage 1A, grade 1) can respond well; however, the reproducibility and prognostic ability of the current histopathological classification system is suboptimal. Molecular markers can be reproducibly assessed, have been validated as prognostic biomarkers, and may inform patient selection for progestin treatment. DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)-ultramutated tumors and a subset of p53 wild-type or DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumors with 'low-risk' features (eg, progesterone and estrogen receptor-positive) may have improved response rates, though this needs to be validated. DISCUSSION: Molecular markers can identify cases which may be candidates for progestin treatment. More work is needed to validate these biomarkers and potentially identify new ones. Predictive biomarkers are anticipated to inform future research into progestin treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer and ultimately improve patient outcomes. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial hyperplasia; endometrial neoplasms

Year:  2020        PMID: 32381512     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Endometrial Cancer Following Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Insertion in Young Women with Atypical Hyperplasia: Two Case Reports and Literature Review.

Authors:  Hongfa Peng; Jingjing Jiang; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  The Prediction of Recurrence in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift in Adjuvant Therapy?

Authors:  Mohamed Laban; Seif Tarek El-Swaify; Sara H Ali; Mazen A Refaat; Mohamed Sabbour; Nourhan Farrag; Alaa Sayed Hassanin
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  The Perspectives of Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jure Knez; Leyla Al Mahdawi; Iztok Takač; Monika Sobočan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Management of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Patients After Primary Fertility-Sparing Therapy.

Authors:  Junyu Chen; Dongyan Cao; Jiaxin Yang; Mei Yu; Huimei Zhou; Ninghai Cheng; Jinhui Wang; Ying Zhang; Peng Peng; Keng Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Fertility Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer Patients: The Potential Role of the New Molecular Classification.

Authors:  Anna Franca Cavaliere; Federica Perelli; Simona Zaami; Marco D'Indinosante; Irene Turrini; Marco Giusti; Giuseppe Gullo; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Alberto Mattei; Giovanni Scambia; Annalisa Vidiri; Fabrizio Signore
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Pushing the envelope: expanding fertility sparing treatment of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Katherine Ikard Stewart; Melinda S Yates; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.401

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.