Literature DB >> 32381363

Cervical cancer with ≤5 mm depth of invasion and >7 mm horizontal spread - Is lymph node assessment only required in patients with LVSI?

Hans H B Wenzel1, Kim G G Van Kol2, Hans W Nijman3, Valery E P P Lemmens4, Maaike A Van der Aa5, Renée M F Ebisch2, Ruud L M Bekkers6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer with ≤5 mm depth of invasion and >7 mm horizontal spread is classified FIGO IA instead of FIGO IB in the revised staging system, as horizontal spread is no longer considered. We aimed to determine the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and, consequently, the necessity of pelvic lymph node assessment.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed between January 2015 and May 2019 with cervical cancer FIGO (2009) stage IB with ≤5 mm depth of invasion and >7 mm horizontal spread, were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Associations between disease-characteristics and lymph node metastasis (LNM), and overall survival, were assessed.
RESULTS: Of 170 patients, six (3.5%) had LNM: 4/53 (7.6%) with adenocarcinoma and 2/117 (1.7%) with squamous cell carcinoma (p = .077). Four-year overall survival was 98.2%. LNM was observed more often in tumours with LVSI (4/43 patients, 9.3%) than without LVSI (2/117 patients, 1.7%) (p = .045). In adenocarcinoma with 3-5 mm depth of invasion LNM rate was 10% (4/40). None of the following tumours were observed with LNM: squamous cell carcinoma without LVSI (0/74); adenocarcinoma with <3 mm depth of invasion (0/13); <3 mm depth of invasion without LVSI (0/36).
CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node assessment is essential in any tumour with LVSI or in adenocarcinoma with 3-5 mm depth of invasion. It can be omitted in squamous cell carcinoma without LVSI, in adenocarcinoma with <3 mm depth of invasion and in any tumours without LVSI and with <3 mm depth of invasion.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Lymph node metastasis; Microinvasive; Squamous cell carcinoma; Survival; Uterine cervical neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32381363     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

1.  The diagnostic value of core needle biopsy in cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Massimiliano Lia; Lars-Christian Horn; Paulina Sodeikat; Michael Höckel; Bahriye Aktas; Benjamin Wolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Surgery for cervical cancer: consensus & controversies.

Authors:  Pabashi Poddar; Amita Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

3.  Age-Dependent Hematologic Toxicity Profiles and Prognostic Serologic Markers in Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Eva Meixner; Line Hoeltgen; Philipp Hoegen; Laila König; Nathalie Arians; Laura L Michel; Katharina Smetanay; Carlo Fremd; Andreas Schneeweiss; Jürgen Debus; Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

4.  Does the New FIGO 2018 Staging System Allow Better Prognostic Differentiation in Early Stage Cervical Cancer? A Dutch Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mieke L G Ten Eikelder; Floor Hinten; Anke Smits; Maaike A Van der Aa; Ruud L M Bekkers; Joanna IntHout; Hans H B Wenzel; Petra L M Zusterzeel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Amide proton transfer weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting lymphovascular space invasion and deep stromal invasion of IB1-IIA1 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Qingling Song; Shifeng Tian; Changjun Ma; Xing Meng; Lihua Chen; Nan Wang; Liangjie Lin; Jiazheng Wang; Qingwei Song; Ailian Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.