Jennifer Hu1, Tina Wu2, Swathi Damodaran3, Karen M Tabb4, Amy Bauer5, Hsiang Huang3. 1. Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA. Electronic address: jthu@challiance.org. 2. Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA. Electronic address: tiwu@challiance.org. 3. Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA. 4. School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic minorities experience a greater burden of mental health problems than white adults in the United States. The collaborative care model is increasingly being adopted to improve access to services and to promote diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric diseases. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review seeks to summarize what is known about collaborative care on depression outcomes for racial/ethnic minorities in the United States. METHODS: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method. Collaborative care studies were included if they comprised adults from at least one racial/ethnic minority group, were located in primary care clinics in the United States, and had depression outcome measures. Core principles described by the University of Washington Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions Center were used to define the components of collaborative care. RESULTS: Of 398 titles screened, 169 full-length articles were assessed for eligibility, and 19 studies were included in our review (10 randomized controlled trials, 9 observational). Results show there is potential that collaborative care, with or without cultural/linguistic tailoring, is effective in improving depression for racial/ethnic minorities, including those from low socioeconomic backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care should be explored as an intervention for treating depression for racial/ethnic minority patients in primary care. Questions remain as to what elements of cultural adaptation are most helpful, factors behind the difficulty in recruiting minority patients for these studies, and how the inclusion of virtual components changes access to and delivery of care. Future research should also recruit individuals from less studied populations.
BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic minorities experience a greater burden of mental health problems than white adults in the United States. The collaborative care model is increasingly being adopted to improve access to services and to promote diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric diseases. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review seeks to summarize what is known about collaborative care on depression outcomes for racial/ethnic minorities in the United States. METHODS: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method. Collaborative care studies were included if they comprised adults from at least one racial/ethnic minority group, were located in primary care clinics in the United States, and had depression outcome measures. Core principles described by the University of Washington Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions Center were used to define the components of collaborative care. RESULTS: Of 398 titles screened, 169 full-length articles were assessed for eligibility, and 19 studies were included in our review (10 randomized controlled trials, 9 observational). Results show there is potential that collaborative care, with or without cultural/linguistic tailoring, is effective in improving depression for racial/ethnic minorities, including those from low socioeconomic backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care should be explored as an intervention for treating depression for racial/ethnic minority patients in primary care. Questions remain as to what elements of cultural adaptation are most helpful, factors behind the difficulty in recruiting minority patients for these studies, and how the inclusion of virtual components changes access to and delivery of care. Future research should also recruit individuals from less studied populations.
Authors: Miriam C Tepper; Mary Catherine Ward; Rajendra Aldis; Margaret Lanca; Philip S Wang; Carl E Fulwiler Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2022-03-30
Authors: Lisa C Rosenfeld; Philip Wang; Jackie Holland; Matthew Ruble; Taft Parsons; Hsiang Huang Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 2.290
Authors: Emily Fu; Allison J Carroll; Lisa J Rosenthal; Jeffrey Rado; Inger Burnett-Zeigler; Neil Jordan; Andrew D Carlo; Adaora Ekwonu; Ariella Kust; C Hendricks Brown; John G Csernansky; Justin D Smith Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Maria E Garcia; Ladson Hinton; John Neuhaus; Mitchell Feldman; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah S Karliner Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-08-01