Literature DB >> 32381186

Thin Composite-Wire-Strut Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Ultrathin-Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in BIONYX at 2 Years.

Rosaly A Buiten1, Eline H Ploumen1, Paolo Zocca2, Carine J M Doggen3, Gillian A J Jessurun4, Carl E Schotborgh5, Ariel Roguin6, Peter W Danse7, Edouard Benit8, Adel Aminian9, K Gert van Houwelingen2, Alexander R Schramm4, Martin G Stoel2, Samer Somi5, Marc Hartmann2, Gerard C M Linssen10, Clemens von Birgelen11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess 2-year safety and efficacy of the current-generation thin composite-wire-strut durable-polymer Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), compared with the ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in all-comers and a pre-specified small-vessel subgroup analysis.
BACKGROUND: The Resolute Onyx ZES is widely used in clinical practice, but no follow-up data beyond 1 year have been published. The randomized BIONYX (Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Orsiro Versus Durable Polymer-Coated Resolute Onyx Stents) trial (NCT02508714) established the noninferiority of ZES versus SES regarding target vessel failure (TVF) rates.
METHODS: A total of 2,488 all-comer patients were treated at 7 coronary intervention centers in Belgium, Israel, and the Netherlands. The main endpoint, TVF, was a composite of safety (cardiac death or target vessel-related myocardial infarction) and efficacy (clinically indicated target vessel revascularization). Two-year follow-up data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
RESULTS: Two-year follow-up data were available for 2,460 of 2,488 patients (98.9%). TVF occurred in 93 of 1,243 patients (7.6%) assigned to ZES versus 87 of 1,245 patients (7.1%) assigned to SES (log-rank p = 0.66). There was no significant between-stent difference in individual components of this endpoint. The incidence of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis was low for both treatment arms (0.4% vs. 1.1%; log-rank p = 0.057). In patients stented in small vessels, there was no between-stent difference (TVF 8.2% vs. 8.7% [log-rank p = 0.75], target lesion revascularization 4.0% vs. 4.4% [log-rank p = 0.77]).
CONCLUSIONS: At 2-year follow-up, the novel thin composite-wire-strut durable-polymer Resolute Onyx ZES showed in all-comers similar safety and efficacy compared with the ultrathin cobalt-chromium-strut biodegradable-polymer Orsiro SES. The analysis of patients who were treated in small vessels also suggested no advantage for either stent.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; drug-eluting stents; percutaneous coronary intervention

Year:  2020        PMID: 32381186     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  3 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after ultrathin vs. conventional 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mahesh V Madhavan; James P Howard; Azim Naqvi; Ori Ben-Yehuda; Bjorn Redfors; Megha Prasad; Bahira Shahim; Martin B Leon; Sripal Bangalore; Gregg W Stone; Yousif Ahmad
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Thin Strut CoCr Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus A9-Eluting Stents versus Thicker Strut Stainless Steel Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus A9-Eluting Stents: Two-Year Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Ian B A Menown; Mamas A Mamas; James M Cotton; David Hildick-Smith; Franz R Eberli; Gregor Leibundgut; Damras Tresukosol; Carlos Macaya; Samuel Copt; Sara Sadozai Slama; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Riashad Monjur; Christian F Said; Paul Bamford; Michael Parkinson; Richard Szirt; Thomas Ford
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.