Literature DB >> 32380545

Five-year outcomes following complex reconstructive surgery for infective endocarditis involving the intervalvular fibrous body.

Piroze M Davierwala1, Mateo Marin-Cuartas1, Martin Misfeld1, Salil V Deo2, Sven Lehmann1, Jens Garbade1, David M Holzhey1, Michael A Borger1, Farhad Bakhtiary3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Destruction of the intervalvular fibrous body (IFB) due to infective endocarditis (IE) warrants a complex operation involving radical debridement of all infected tissue, followed by double valve replacement (aortic and mitral valve replacement) with patch reconstruction of the IFB. This study assesses the 5-year outcomes in patients undergoing this complex procedure for treatment of double valve IE with IFB involvement.
METHODS: A total of 127 consecutive patients underwent double valve replacement with reconstruction of the IFB for active complex IE between January 1999 and December 2018. Primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year survival, as well as 5-year freedom from reoperation.
RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 65.3 ± 12.9 years. Preoperative cardiogenic shock and sepsis were present in 17.3% and 18.9%, respectively. The majority of patients (81.3%) had undergone previous cardiac surgery. Overall, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 28.3% and 37.0%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 45.3 ± 5.1% and 41.8 ± 5.8%, and for those who survived the first 90 postoperative days 75.8 ± 6.1% and 70.0 ± 8.0%, respectively. The overall 5-year freedom from reoperation was 85.1 ± 5.7%. Preoperative predictors for 30-day mortality were Staphylococcus aureus [odds ratio (OR) 1.65; P = 0.04] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% (OR 12.06; P = 0.03), for 90-day mortality acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (OR 6.2; P = 0.02) and LVEF <35% (OR 9.66; P = 0.03) and for long-term mortality cardiogenic shock (hazard ratio 2.46; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Double valve replacement with reconstruction of the IFB in patients with complex IE is a challenging operation associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in the first 90 days after surgery. Survival and freedom from reoperation rates are acceptable thereafter, particularly considering the severity of disease and complex surgery.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infective endocarditis; Intervalvular fibrous body; Mitral and aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32380545     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  3 in total

Review 1.  Endocarditis in Patients with Aortic Valve Prosthesis: Comparison between Surgical and Transcatheter Prosthesis.

Authors:  Micaela De Palo; Pietro Scicchitano; Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Domenico Paparella
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  Commentary: Multivalve infective endocarditis: Further support for radical debridement and complex reconstruction.

Authors:  Leonard N Girardi; Christopher Lau
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-26

3.  Reply to Chen et al. Improvements in Outcomes and Expanding Indications for the Commando Procedure. Comment on "Giambuzzi et al. Surgical Aortic Mitral Curtain Replacement: Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Early and Long-Term Results. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3163".

Authors:  Ilaria Giambuzzi; Giorgia Bonalumi; Michele Di Mauro; Francesco Alamanni; Marco Zanobini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.