Qi Wang1, Dai Zhang1, Ying-Yu Zhao1, Hong Hai1, Yue-Wen Ma2. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. Electronic address: mayw@cmu1h.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The contralesional hemisphere compensation may play a critical role in the recovery of stroke when there is extensive damage to one hemisphere. There is little research on the treatment of hemiplegia by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the contralesional cortex. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a 2-week randomized, sham-controlled, single-blind trial to determine whether high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) over the contralesional motor cortex can improve motor function in severe stroke patients. METHODS:Forty-five patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory were randomly assigned to treatment with 10 Hz rTMS (HF group), 1 Hz rTMS (LF group) or sham rTMS (sham group) applied over the contralesional motor cortex (M1) before physiotherapy daily for two weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) Scale score from baseline to 2 weeks. The secondary endpoints included root mean square of surface electromyography (RMS-SEMG), Barthel Index (BI), and contralesional hemisphere cortical excitability. RESULTS: The HF group showed a more significant improvement in FMA score (p < 0.05), BI (p < 0.005), contralesional hemisphere cortical excitability and conductivity (p < 0.05), and RMS-SEMG of the key muscles (p < 0.05) compared with the LF group and sham group. There were no significant differences between the LF group and sham group. There was a positive correlation between cortical conductivity of the uninjured hemisphere and recovery of motor impairment (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS:HF-rTMS over the contralesional cortex was superior to low-frequency rTMS and sham stimulation in promoting motor recovery in patients with severe hemiplegic stroke by acting on contralesional cortex plasticity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=23264 (ChiCTR-IPR-17013580).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The contralesional hemisphere compensation may play a critical role in the recovery of stroke when there is extensive damage to one hemisphere. There is little research on the treatment of hemiplegia by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to the contralesional cortex. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a 2-week randomized, sham-controlled, single-blind trial to determine whether high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) over the contralesional motor cortex can improve motor function in severe strokepatients. METHODS: Forty-five patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory were randomly assigned to treatment with 10 Hz rTMS (HF group), 1 Hz rTMS (LF group) or sham rTMS (sham group) applied over the contralesional motor cortex (M1) before physiotherapy daily for two weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) Scale score from baseline to 2 weeks. The secondary endpoints included root mean square of surface electromyography (RMS-SEMG), Barthel Index (BI), and contralesional hemisphere cortical excitability. RESULTS: The HF group showed a more significant improvement in FMA score (p < 0.05), BI (p < 0.005), contralesional hemisphere cortical excitability and conductivity (p < 0.05), and RMS-SEMG of the key muscles (p < 0.05) compared with the LF group and sham group. There were no significant differences between the LF group and sham group. There was a positive correlation between cortical conductivity of the uninjured hemisphere and recovery of motor impairment (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: HF-rTMS over the contralesional cortex was superior to low-frequency rTMS and sham stimulation in promoting motor recovery in patients with severe hemiplegic stroke by acting on contralesional cortex plasticity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=23264 (ChiCTR-IPR-17013580).