Literature DB >> 32380029

The challenge of laypeople cardio-pulmonary resuscitation training during and after COVID-19 pandemic.

Enrico Baldi1, Enrico Contri2, Simone Savastano3, Andrea Cortegiani4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32380029      PMCID: PMC7198416          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, COVID-19 pandemic is impacting on all our life aspects, included out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and resuscitation: the challenge is ensuring the best survival chance to OHCA patients, with or without COVID-19, without compromising rescuers’ safety.2, 3 Regarding laypeople, this issue is even more relevant as they are unlikely to have personal protective equipment (PPE) immediately available and as the risk of infection and the reluctance to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation, the most common fears also in the pre-epidemic era,4, 5 may lead to hesitation in performing CPR. ILCOR and national societies promoted guidance about how to perform CPR in COVID-19 era, suggesting at least compression-only CPR reserving mouth-to-mouth ventilation only if willing and able, especially in case of household member victim. Considering that OHCA most often occurs at home, the contagion risk seems therefore limited. However, a growing trouble we must deal with is the CPR training issue. Bystander CPR is crucial in improving OHCA victims’ survival and its increase over the years is the result of a massive training effort by scientific societies, institutions and associations. This was essentially based on Basic Life Support (BLS) courses where groups of people learned chest compressions and mouth-to-mouth ventilation on the same manikin separated by a simple personal face-shield. An unthinkable scenario henceforth. Social distancing and protective facemask will be our companions for months, perhaps years. Training centers will try to make extraordinary efforts to organize themselves limiting the learners’ number in training sessions, providing gloves, hand-sanitizers and hygienizing premises, manikins and AED trainer, but the issue related to mouth-to-mouth ventilation remains (Table 1 ). Sharing the same manikin for teaching this technique appears unthinkable, even using pocket masks, both because it's difficult to ensure safety (ventilation is an aerosol-generating procedure and trainees should remove their protective mask) and because of attendees’ fear in performing this skill. A solution could be ensuring that each learner uses only “personal” manikin throughout the session, guaranteeing distancing during the course and perfect manikin hygienization after the course, also exchanging some parts (face, lungs). However, beyond the costs, it is difficult to guarantee a perfect hygienization, also considering the presumed learner's fear to perform mouth-to-mouth on a manikin used soon before by another person. Moreover, a person resulted infected by COVID-19 some days after the course could blame the training center of an improperly manikin hygienization.
Table 1

Issues related to CPR training and possible solutions to be adopted by CPR training centers.

IssuePossible solutions
Mantaining correct social distancingLimit the number of learners in training sessionsGuarantee distancing among trainees during the course“Personal” manikin and AED trainer throughout the session (if possible)
Reducing droplet diffusionWear facemask for all the sessionProvide gloves to instructors and learnersHand sanitizers available to instructors and learnersHygienize the premises, the manikins and the AED trainerAvoid mouth-to-mouth ventilation
Reducing learners’ fear of virus transmissionClear information and preliminary session to adequately inform the learners about the measures put in place to reduce the risk of contagion
Issues related to CPR training and possible solutions to be adopted by CPR training centers. Considering all aspects, the more straightforward and feasible thing seem to be withdrawing mouth-to-mouth ventilation at least until pandemic end. However, mouth-to-mouth ventilation is a required skill to obtain a BLS certificate and the BLS certificate acquisition is required even for laypeople in certain settings. Therefore, we believe that a scientific societies’ position statement is urgently needed to allow a safe restart of CPR training for learners and instructors, probably allowing only compression-only CPR teaching to acquire a BLS certification at least until the epidemic disappears. The risk is wiping out decades of training efforts in resuscitation field, causing an increase in OHCA mortality as COVID-19 indirect effect.

Funding

No specific funding were received for the present article.

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  5 in total

1.  Mouth-to-mouth: an obstacle to cardiopulmonary resuscitation for lay-rescuers.

Authors:  Enrico Baldi; Daniele Bertaia; Simone Savastano
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in real life: the most frequent fears of lay rescuers.

Authors:  Simone Savastano; Vincenzo Vanni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Dana P Edelson; Comilla Sasson; Paul S Chan; Dianne L Atkins; Khalid Aziz; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg; Steven M Bradley; Steven C Brooks; Adam Cheng; Marilyn Escobedo; Gustavo E Flores; Saket Girotra; Antony Hsu; Beena D Kamath-Rayne; Henry C Lee; Rebecca E Lehotsky; Mary E Mancini; Raina M Merchant; Vinay M Nadkarni; Ashish R Panchal; Mary Ann R Peberdy; Tia T Raymond; Brian Walsh; David S Wang; Carolyn M Zelop; Alexis A Topjian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  COVID-19 in cardiac arrest and infection risk to rescuers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Keith Couper; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Amy Grove; Karoline Freeman; Osemeke Osokogu; Rachel Court; Amin Mehrabian; Peter T Morley; Jerry P Nolan; Jasmeet Soar; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period.

Authors:  Stephen M Kissler; Christine Tedijanto; Yonatan H Grad; Marc Lipsitch; Edward Goldstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training strategies in the times of COVID-19: a systematic literature review comparing different training methodologies.

Authors:  Daniyal Mansoor Ali; Butool Hisam; Natasha Shaukat; Noor Baig; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Jonathan L Epstein; Eric Goralnick; Paul D Kivela; Bryan McNally; Junaid Razzak
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Missed training, collateral damage from COVID 19?

Authors:  Stirparo Giuseppe; Lorenzo Bellini; Nazzareno Fagoni; Salvatore Compatti; Marco Botteri; Guido Francesco Villa; Stefano Sironi; Carlo Signorelli; Giuseppe Maria Sechi; Albero Zoli
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 1.385

3.  Open online courses on basic life support: Availability and resuscitation guidelines compliance.

Authors:  Alexei Birkun; Adhish Gautam; Fatima Trunkwala; Bernd W Böttiger
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.093

4.  Thin foil body-shield resuscitation barrier device to protect from blood: an experimental study.

Authors:  Martin Hermann; Wolfgang Lederer; Markus Isser; Valentin Bilgeri; Andreas Klinger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation missed by bystanders: Collateral damage of coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stirparo; Nazzareno Fagoni; Lorenzo Bellini; Aurea Oradini-Alacreu; Maurizio Migliari; Guido Francesco Villa; Marco Botteri; Carlo Signorelli; Giuseppe Maria Sechi; Alberto Zoli
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.274

Review 6.  Readiness of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (BCPR) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Fattah Fazel; Mohamad Haiqal Nizar Mohamad; Mohd Azmani Sahar; Norsham Juliana; Izuddin Fahmy Abu; Srijit Das
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.