Literature DB >> 32379930

Guidelines for standardized nomenclature and reporting in uterus transplantation: An opinion from the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium.

Liza Johannesson1, Giuliano Testa1, Rebecca Flyckt2, Ruth Farrell2, Cristiano Quintini3, Anji Wall1, Kathleen O'Neill4, Andreas Tzakis3, Elliott G Richards2, Scott M Gordon5,6, Paige M Porrett7.   

Abstract

Uterus transplantation is a nascent but growing field. To support this growth, the United States Uterus Transplant Consortium proposes guidelines for nomenclature related to operative technique, vascular anatomy, and donor, recipient, and offspring outcomes. In terms of anatomy, the group recommends reporting donor arterial inflow and recipient anastomotic site delivering inflow to the graft and offers standardization of the names for the 4 veins originating from the uterus because of current inconsistency in this particular nomenclature. Seven progressive stages with milestones of success are defined for reporting on uterus transplantation outcomes: (1) technical, (2) menstruation, (3) embryo implantation, (4) pregnancy, (5) delivery, (6) graft removal, and (7) long-term follow-up. The 3 primary metrics for success are recipient survival (as reported for other organ transplant recipients), graft survival, and uterus transplant live birth rate (defined as live birth per transplanted recipient). A number of secondary outcomes should also be reported, most of which capture stage-specific milestones, as well as data on graft failure. Outcome metrics for living donors include patient survival, survival free of operative intervention, and data on complications and hospitalizations. Finally, we make specific recommendations on follow-up for offspring born from uterine grafts, which includes specialty surveillance as well as collection and reporting of routine pediatric outcomes. The goal of standardization in reporting is to create consistency and improve the quality of evidence available on the efficacy and value of the procedure.
© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; editorial/personal viewpoint; guidelines; obstetrics and gynecology; patient safety; patient survival; pregnancy; reproductive biology; vascularized composite and reconstructive transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32379930     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  4 in total

1.  The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.

Authors:  Seppe Segers
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  Uterus transplantation: state of the art in 2021.

Authors:  Elliott G Richards; Ruth M Farrell; Stephanie Ricci; Uma Perni; Cristiano Quintini; Andreas Tzakis; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 3.  Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement.

Authors:  Emily H Frisch; Tommaso Falcone; Rebecca L Flyckt; Andreas G Tzakis; Eric Kodish; Elliott G Richards
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Radiologic Evaluation of Uterine Vasculature of Uterus Transplant Living Donor Candidates: DUETS Classification.

Authors:  Jakub Kristek; Liza Johannesson; Matthew Paul Clemons; Dana Kautznerova; Jaroslav Chlupac; Jiri Fronek; Giuliano Testa; Gregory dePrisco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.