Literature DB >> 32379294

Detection of somatic structural variants from short-read next-generation sequencing data.

Tingting Gong, Vanessa M Hayes, Eva K F Chan.   

Abstract

Somatic structural variants (SVs), which are variants that typically impact >50 nucleotides, play a significant role in cancer development and evolution but are notoriously more difficult to detect than small variants from short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. This is due to a combination of challenges attributed to the purity of tumour samples, tumour heterogeneity, limitations of short-read information from NGS and sequence alignment ambiguities. In spite of active development of SV detection tools (callers) over the past few years, each method has inherent advantages and limitations. In this review, we highlight some of the important factors affecting somatic SV detection and compared the performance of seven commonly used SV callers. In particular, we focus on the extent of change in sensitivity and precision for detecting different SV types and size ranges from samples with differing variant allele frequencies and sequencing depths of coverage. We highlight the reasons for why some SV callers perform well in some settings but not others, allowing our evaluation findings to be extended beyond the seven SV callers examined in this paper. As the importance of large SVs become increasingly recognized in cancer genomics, this paper provides a timely review on some of the most impactful factors influencing somatic SV detection that should be considered when choosing SV callers.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer genomic; next-generation sequencing; structural variant; variant caller

Year:  2021        PMID: 32379294     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  8 in total

Review 1.  Structural variations in cancer and the 3D genome.

Authors:  Frank Dubois; Nikos Sidiropoulos; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Rameen Beroukhim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 69.800

2.  Optimizing Nanopore sequencing-based detection of structural variants enables individualized circulating tumor DNA-based disease monitoring in cancer patients.

Authors:  Jose Espejo Valle-Inclan; Christina Stangl; Anouk C de Jong; Lisanne F van Dessel; Markus J van Roosmalen; Jean C A Helmijr; Ivo Renkens; Roel Janssen; Sam de Blank; Chris J de Witte; John W M Martens; Maurice P H M Jansen; Martijn P Lolkema; Wigard P Kloosterman
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.117

3.  Whole-genome analysis of Nigerian patients with breast cancer reveals ethnic-driven somatic evolution and distinct genomic subtypes.

Authors:  Naser Ansari-Pour; Yonglan Zheng; Toshio F Yoshimatsu; Ayodele Sanni; Mustapha Ajani; Jean-Baptiste Reynier; Avraam Tapinos; Jason J Pitt; Stefan Dentro; Anna Woodard; Padma Sheila Rajagopal; Dominic Fitzgerald; Andreas J Gruber; Abayomi Odetunde; Abiodun Popoola; Adeyinka G Falusi; Chinedum Peace Babalola; Temidayo Ogundiran; Nasiru Ibrahim; Jordi Barretina; Peter Van Loo; Mengjie Chen; Kevin P White; Oladosu Ojengbede; John Obafunwa; Dezheng Huo; David C Wedge; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  SimFFPE and FilterFFPE: improving structural variant calling in FFPE samples.

Authors:  Lanying Wei; Martin Dugas; Sarah Sandmann
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 5.  Unravelling the tumour genome: The evolutionary and clinical impacts of structural variants in tumourigenesis.

Authors:  Alhafidz Hamdan; Ailith Ewing
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 9.883

Review 6.  Detection of Structural Variants by NGS: Revealing Missing Alleles in Lysosomal Storage Diseases.

Authors:  Valentina La Cognata; Sebastiano Cavallaro
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-29

7.  Genome-wide interrogation of structural variation reveals novel African-specific prostate cancer oncogenic drivers.

Authors:  Tingting Gong; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Jue Jiang; Cali Willet; Tracy Chew; Sean M Patrick; Ruth J Lyons; Anne-Maree Haynes; Gabriela Pasqualim; Ilma Simoni Brum; Phillip D Stricker; Shingai B A Mutambirwa; Rosemarie Sadsad; Anthony T Papenfuss; Riana M S Bornman; Eva K F Chan; Vanessa M Hayes
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 15.266

8.  Structural variants in the barley gene pool: precision and sensitivity to detect them using short-read sequencing and their association with gene expression and phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Christopher Arlt; Po-Ya Wu; Marius Weisweiler; Delphine Van Inghelandt; Thomas Hartwig; Benjamin Stich
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 5.574

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.